Shaping London’s economic future

Closed

1285 Londoners have responded | 31/07/2024 - 15/09/2024

Street view of the stalls at Lower Marsh

Discussions

Discussion | Growing London’s economy together

User Image for
Added by Talk London

City Hall -in partnership with London Councils- is working on the London Growth Plan. This is a strategic document about the best way to grow London’s economy for the benefit of all Londoners.  

 Your experience of living and working in London will help them shape the plan. 

 Join the conversation: 

  • How do you see your future in the capital? What do you need to thrive?  
  • What do you like most or least about your local high street, and why? 
  • What does a good job or good place to work look like to you? 
  • What does successful economic growth look like to you? What would make you feel like you’re benefitting from it too?  

Shaun from City Hall’s Economic Development team will be joining in the discussion. 

The discussion ran from 31 July 2024 - 15 September 2024

Closed


Want to join our next discussion?

New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.

Join Talk London

Already have an account?

Log into your account
Comments (411)

Avatar for -

London's young really need to be prioritized.  Investment in their mental wellbeing: City Hall, schools and local authorities working together with NHS CAMHS.  London's young would also benefit immensely from Britain reentering the Erasmus...

Show full comment

London's young really need to be prioritized.  Investment in their mental wellbeing: City Hall, schools and local authorities working together with NHS CAMHS.  London's young would also benefit immensely from Britain reentering the Erasmus programme and with greater school exchanges with: the US, France, Germany, Sweden, Spain, South Korea, India and other countries.  

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Sumatran elephant

The major limiting factor to almost all of our economic problems seems to be a massively overbearing planning burden blocking new housing, placating the NIMBYs who can’t stand high density housing. Reducing the rent cost everyone spends on...

Show full comment

The major limiting factor to almost all of our economic problems seems to be a massively overbearing planning burden blocking new housing, placating the NIMBYs who can’t stand high density housing. Reducing the rent cost everyone spends on housing/commercial space means individuals and businesses have more disposable income to invest in themselves. If I weren’t so worried about saving for a modest house to start a family, I would absolutely be pausing my career to do a PhD, which would ultimately make me far more productive. However, biological clocks exist and I don’t have time for 4 years of near poverty wages. 

Some policies I am in favour of:

Major overhaul of planning process: we should simplify rules to allow developers/private home improvers to almost never require a case worker. The rules should be clear and allow automatic permission for as much as possible.

 
Expand the rights of those who own flats to be able to extend their property. We need to incentivise high density living to meet the housing supply shortfall, yet leaseholders of flats have almost no power and are left at the whims of functionally unaccountable building management companies. I say this as a private renter who has a great landlord but an absolutely useless building management agency that has legal power to forbid the landlord from performing basic repairs, instead contracting out to the cheapest most ineffective agency they could find, leaving my flat actively leaking for eight months. 

6-story minimum for all but exceptional cases of new housing development. I want the density of Kensington all over London. This keeps commute times low, is far more carbon efficient, and allows businesses to thrive with the huge local consumer base. 

Finally, air conditioning should be standard in housing. We should invest in solar power to meet this need, but the productivity loss from lack of sleep is only going to worsen with climate change. We should prepare now. 

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Orangutan

For years now there has been a lot of talk about the environment, pollution, air quality, etc. and yet developers have free rein when it comes to construction.    We should have insisted that all new builds were "green" many many years ago...

Show full comment

For years now there has been a lot of talk about the environment, pollution, air quality, etc. and yet developers have free rein when it comes to construction.    We should have insisted that all new builds were "green" many many years ago.    

There is also a gret deal of talk about the need for housing and a casual glance at the number of huge cranes everywhere shows that property development continues apace.   In my small area there have been four developments in the past few years and they may be selling, but who is buying them and how many of them are actually occupied?   I reckon at least 50% are empty, having been purchased as Buy to Let - but of course nobody can afford to rent them so they become Buy to Leave.     Even the Housing Trusts are pulling out of agreements made with developers to buy "affordable homes" because they know they will not be able to find tenants to afford the rent necessary to recoup their investment.     China's property boom is crashing and the same will happen in our cities any time now.    The only solution is council housing - owned and managed by the council - and strict regulation of rental properties, many of which are substandard and some of which are downright uninhabitable and dangerous.     

Recent studies have shown that there are about a many empty (abandoned) properties in the UK and a similar amount which are simply not being lived in.    There are already regulations in place which allow Councils, if necessary, to take these properties over - and so they should.    https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn04129/   (Empty Dwelling Management Orders).

Finally, the environmental harm and air pollution caused by building sites in cities cannot be exaggerated but is barely ever mentioned.   I wonder why? 

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Orangutan

"Statistics published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) put the number of empty homes in England in October 2018 at 634,453. This represents a 4.7% increase on the previous year’s total. Of the 634,435...

Show full comment

"Statistics published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) put the number of empty homes in England in October 2018 at 634,453. This represents a 4.7% increase on the previous year’s total. Of the 634,435, 216,186 were classed as long-term empty properties (empty for longer than six months)."

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Some bploughs hAve uset GLA grants to build student accomodation! At the detriment of loval residents whom have been waiting for years. Priorotising Ukranian Refugees in new builds has caused so much tension & added to community...

Show full comment

Some bploughs hAve uset GLA grants to build student accomodation! At the detriment of loval residents whom have been waiting for years. Priorotising Ukranian Refugees in new builds has caused so much tension & added to community dissatisfaction mis information  & verbal abuse

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Tiger

I don't think this survey provides meaningful information for those intending to make change to the London landscape, whether in terms of housing, transport, education, entertainment. In fact, it is very difficult to see just what...

Show full comment

I don't think this survey provides meaningful information for those intending to make change to the London landscape, whether in terms of housing, transport, education, entertainment. In fact, it is very difficult to see just what information the survey is intended to elicit from respondents. If, as I suspect, it is about the Mayor's plans to enlarge the population of London, the survey does not address this matter directly. I think it will be disastrous for London, to grow beyond its present size. It will also be disastrous for London if the Mayor is allowed to continue with his plans to build 100s of tower blocks all in and around the city. If anything, London's daytime and nightime population needs to come down by about 2 million. The city is overcrowded, transport facilities are inadequate to meet the needs of residents and visitors, the water and sewage systems are already overloaded, the streets are clogged with cars (why do private cars need to come into central London at all!), skip lorries, concrete pump lorries, all sorts of vehicles connected with the building industry. London is short of doctors' surgeries, dentists, hospital beds, schools, libraries. We have lost our night sky. We are lacking green spaces. The Mayor should copy Paris, where building heights are strictly controlled and, gradually, 15-minute 'cities' are being created so people can do almost everything they want within a 15-minute walk. London is, slowly but surely, becoming unlivable. As for the idea of creating a 'hub' with Oxford and Cambridge, that is a ludicrous idea. 

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Hi Chiswick22, thank you for your comments. The Mayor does not have specific plans to increase the population of London, but does not ignore the reality that the city's population is continuing to grow annually and will hit 9.6m by 2035. 

The London Growth Plan recognises that in order to sustain a thriving economy London needs an affordable supply of good quality housing, convenient transport links and other infrastructure to support a growing population. Some of these are in the direct gift of the Mayor or London local authorities, but others require cross-agency working or national legislative change to enable. The Growth Plan attempts to set out together what London needs to build on its economic strengths and address it weaknesses (specifically affordability, insecure work). To understand these needs better, we're seeking the views of Londoners on their everyday economic concerns and whether they feel they can meet their aspirations for life in London.

Cambridge is the UK's fastest growing city (17% increase in population between the last two censuses) and along with Oxford, is a globally renowned centre for learning, research and industries of the future including life sciences. Both are within around an hour journey time to central London and that presents an opportunity to consider that learning and labour market system in the whole.

The concept of a '15 minute city' has attracted some conflicting attention in recent years from its position as quite a technical planning principle. But yes, the values underpinning it are reflected in policies to introduce low-traffic neighbourhoods & public transport investment (making walking and cycling more attractive modes of transport), work to protect London's high streets and denser neighbourhoods where people live closer to amenities. The Mayor does not have powers or plans to build 100s of tower blocks as you suggest, though the office does have oversight over some planning decisions. You may be interested in the separate but related London Plan - London's spatial development strategy - for more information on how London is anticipated to develop in the next 20-25 years.

Best,

 

Shaun

GLA Economic Fairness team

 

Avatar for - Orangutan

I believe that if you bother to read the comments you will find that the things you are extolling are exactly the things which residents are objecting to.      If the Mayor has oversight over some planning decisions (including traffic?) he...

Show full comment

I believe that if you bother to read the comments you will find that the things you are extolling are exactly the things which residents are objecting to.      If the Mayor has oversight over some planning decisions (including traffic?) he had better make sure he has the backing of the people when he makes those decisions.   At the moment it would seem he does not.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Orangutan

Has the GLA given up on the proportion of the population that can’t cycle or walk far ?

It feels like it .

I have 2 elderly relatives who rely on buses and occasionally taxis to get around . The buses are always full and have great usage by...

Show full comment

Has the GLA given up on the proportion of the population that can’t cycle or walk far ?

It feels like it .

I have 2 elderly relatives who rely on buses and occasionally taxis to get around . The buses are always full and have great usage by elderly, disabled and those with pushchairs yet the bus lanes have been systematically given over to cyclists who nearly always could be sent down a side street . Take a look at Southwark - their cycle routes from New Cross to London Bridge avoid bus routes and are very well used 

Show less of comment

Load more
Avatar for - Orangutan

Very unlikely we will ever find the majority working within 15 minutes of home / certainly not in jobs of any great prospects or salary . So it’s important we have good transport into the centre and across London 

Show full comment

Very unlikely we will ever find the majority working within 15 minutes of home / certainly not in jobs of any great prospects or salary . So it’s important we have good transport into the centre and across London 

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Tiger

Grow the solidarity economy in London!

Including but not limited to:

  • organising the economy to meet our needs rather than generate profits for the rich
  • cooperatives, owned and run by and for the community and the workers
  • ecological and just...
Show full comment

Grow the solidarity economy in London!

Including but not limited to:

  • organising the economy to meet our needs rather than generate profits for the rich
  • cooperatives, owned and run by and for the community and the workers
  • ecological and just creation / production / exchange / use / surplus allocation of goods and services
  • shorter working hours
  • equal pay and/or social waging
  • end landlordism, right to permanent housing for all
Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Thanks Caito,

The Mayor's manifesto for the 2024 Mayoral election specifically committed to increasing the numbers of employee-owned and co-operative business models in London, plus more general workforce dialogue and engagement mechanisms (eg wider Trade Union recognition, . This recognises the link between these things, more equitable outcomes, more productive businesses and ultimately happier citizens. One programme is the London Ownership Hub, a partnership with Co-ops UK and the Employee Ownership Association, offering support to businesses to enact more democratic business ownership models. You can learn more here

 

Best,

Shaun

GLA Economic Fairness

Avatar for -

Mental Health Support for Work

Unemployment ruins mental health. Economies need roles to be created and filled that support the mental health of would be workers and possible business starters, regardless of age. To engage with these people...

Show full comment

Mental Health Support for Work

Unemployment ruins mental health. Economies need roles to be created and filled that support the mental health of would be workers and possible business starters, regardless of age. To engage with these people requires investment through the hardest part - the beginning- of any endeavour regarding work, business and finances.

Rules and attitudes tend to block progress; if you are sick, you’re discouraged from trying to start a business. But if you START feeling better you’re forced to enter the work market before you’re really ready, thus health relapses ensue. Causing  a loss to the economy and increasing tax burdens via the benefits resumption to those whose business or job fails.

Support is needed!

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Thanks for raising this vital issue, Pamela MMA, 

Mental health and financial well-being are absolutely intertwined. Those who find themselves in good quality work that pays a fair wage also tend to experience better mental health outcomes. 

The London Growth Plan will be taking a 'Health in all policies' approach, with the overarching aim that all London's communities can access the city's economic opportunities while living healthily.

Avatar for - Staghorn coral

My local high street isn’t very local at all—I live in an neighbourhood that sees lots of people flocking to on the weekends (which is great for the economy). But the businesses on the high street cater to the visitors, not the residents:...

Show full comment

My local high street isn’t very local at all—I live in an neighbourhood that sees lots of people flocking to on the weekends (which is great for the economy). But the businesses on the high street cater to the visitors, not the residents:  4 gelato shops, 2 creperies, 1 chain bookstore, more designer labels than I can count. Not one of those things are local or independent—and not one of those things actually help me in my day-to-day. 

The traffic in my neighbourhood is also atrocious.  The wealthy residents are not fazed at all by the expensive cost of parking and drive 5 minutes from home to pick up their children from school, clogging the streets. Local busses can barely get down the road sometimes because of the parked cars and traffic. It makes going to businesses difficult and ruins the ambience and is horrible for the environment. 

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Very interesting, thanks MVB

What kinds of things are missing on your local high street in terms of what residents need & want?

If parking costs aren't proving effective to address traffic, what other things do you think would help in your area? Are there any other parts of London where you think this is done well that could be replicated?

Cheers,

 

Shaun

Avatar for - Gorilla

The main issue with the economy in London is that even if you have a decent job, which would allow you to support a family and have a normal living condition and work life balance anywhere else, you never earn enough in London because...

Show full comment

The main issue with the economy in London is that even if you have a decent job, which would allow you to support a family and have a normal living condition and work life balance anywhere else, you never earn enough in London because transport and rent are unaffordable. Rent and home prices are out of control. Everyone excuses this with demand and supply, but it is clear that prices are artificially inflated. It is not possible that rents go up so much every year without regulation, even if you have lived in the same home for a long while. This shouldn’t be allowed by law. I would understand a small contribution for higher expenses, but rents that go up with fake inflation data that only benefit landlords is criminal.

The public transport is a total scam. I would understand the current prices if all the lines were like the Elizabeth line, but apart from the Elizabeth line, the prices of the tube and buses are unjustified. How is it possible that a monthly travel card costs the same as taking the transport by paying trip by trip, and in certain circumstances even more if you don’t travel every day? It’s a total scam. Everywhere in the world, a monthly subscription would reduce the cost to at least half the price, which would benefit residents, and tourists would still pay the full price because they don’t stay a month.

Not to mention the yearly subscription that has a ridiculous price, but it’s clear that this is a tax, literally robbery from a left wing administration that says it does things for the people. What a shame. And all this, you go out and it seems to be like living in a third world country due to the low standards of everything from cleaning conditions to safety, crime, and antisocial behavior. What a mess London is. Shame on you for administering so badly.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Thanks for your comment Rainesixteen,

You're right about the high cost of living in the capital. This is why the Mayor of London is a long-standing supporter of the London Living Wage campaign, which encourages employers to pay at least a rate of pay that reflects the true cost of living. At £13.15 per hour, this is higher than the legal minimums. Over 3,600 employers have accredited as a Living Wage employer in London, resulting in annual pay lifts for 130,000 workers.

Earlier this year, the Mayor froze Transport for London (TfL) fares until 2025. However, he does not have oversight over rail fares. TfL is reliant on passenger fare revenue to meet the day-to-day costs of running the network. Measures such as the Bus Hopper ticket and investment in walking and cycling infrastructure are also designed to ensure Londoners have a number of affordable active travel options. 

The London Growth Plan will seek to understand London's future transport needs over a number of years, including cost, upgrades, repairs and extensions. An efficient, affordable, healthy transport system is pivotal to maintaining London's economic competitiveness.

Best,

Shaun

 

Avatar for - Gorilla

I’m sorry, but your response doesn’t address or solve any of the issues mentioned. Blocking fares for the tube is the least that could be done, given that the fares are already extortionate. You have plenty of delinquents crossing without...

Show full comment

I’m sorry, but your response doesn’t address or solve any of the issues mentioned. Blocking fares for the tube is the least that could be done, given that the fares are already extortionate. You have plenty of delinquents crossing without paying right before my eyes every day. But how can you blame them when taking the tube is like a luxury? In certain cases, it could cost as much as an Uber ride. It’s ridiculous.

Before, there were the Tories, and how bad of them, the mayor was asking for help for tfl, which “they didn’t provide” despite multiple bailouts. But now Labour is in power. Ask them for the money and cut the fares to a decent price, at least to reflect the state of the service, which is ridiculous with screeching, boiling, always late, dirty, decadent trains on 90% of the lines and circumstances.

It’s ridiculous to mention the living wage when, if you were to live on a 40 hour living wage contract, you couldn’t even afford your so called “living rent” not even a one bedroom apartment. Guys, do you realize how sick all this is? How can you even have the audacity to come back with such a ridiculous answer?

You have a thing called a living wage, which, if you work a normal 40 hour contract, wouldn’t allow you to afford even the so called “living rent”, or all those other scam schemes like shared ownership in which between the extra rent for the percentage you don’t buy and the extortionate service charges that go up each year for no reason, for doing nothing, because when you need the company for fixings or problems in the building, they are nowhere to be found, or they say this or that is not covered, and all sorts of other scams…

There are plenty of circumstances of 10 to 20 people living in one bedroom flats, with organized crime profiting from these sorts of things, not to mention everything else around. 

With what straight face do you come back to me answering “living wage” and TFL frozen fares? It’s absurd.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Sumatran elephant

Love the Elizabeth line but why is it down so often. The amount of trains just stopping at Paddington from central in the evening is a joke. Why aren’t all the trains stopping at West Ealing? 

Show full comment

Love the Elizabeth line but why is it down so often. The amount of trains just stopping at Paddington from central in the evening is a joke. Why aren’t all the trains stopping at West Ealing? 

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Staghorn coral

Improving the infrastructure of the economy through these innovative ideas

logistics software that finds the quickest routes, reorder from suppliers easily access all of them, and automate processes and repetitive work in bulk. Better...

Show full comment

Improving the infrastructure of the economy through these innovative ideas

logistics software that finds the quickest routes, reorder from suppliers easily access all of them, and automate processes and repetitive work in bulk. Better designed automations in factories that require less attendance with a device using software connected to the machines to do work and check when things are going wrong.

 

remote IT diagnostics can stop people from being disrupted at work.

 

automation of administration tasks using machine learning and ai in bulk.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Staghorn coral

more innovative ideas - budget alert apps for businesses to use and ai or advanced calculations of what work they need to do to reach a financial goal or surpass, could be used widespread in banks too.

Avatar for -

I feel there should be more fairness for those of us who live in the south east outer London boroughs where we face the prospect of having , very soon, to pay to cross the Thames at Blackwall and the new Silvertown tunnel with charges...

Show full comment

I feel there should be more fairness for those of us who live in the south east outer London boroughs where we face the prospect of having , very soon, to pay to cross the Thames at Blackwall and the new Silvertown tunnel with charges already for the Dartford crossing too. Why do those on the west side of London not have to pay for crossing the river? There are plenty of bridges for them which will also cost a lot to maintain.  Let's have more equality. 

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Monarch butterfly

I am worried about the simplistic "creating jobs" idea in the manifesto.  It will only encourage more people to move here.  I hope some analysis has been done as to why unemployed people can't get jobs.  If you create "good jobs" and "well...

Show full comment

I am worried about the simplistic "creating jobs" idea in the manifesto.  It will only encourage more people to move here.  I hope some analysis has been done as to why unemployed people can't get jobs.  If you create "good jobs" and "well-paid jobs", it is unlikely that the average unemployed person will be able to do them.  I don't know if training opportunities are adequate.
Also I worry that creating jobs by supporting a new company is likely to put out of business an existing company in the same industry.

And growing the economy is the last thing we need in the light of climate change.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Monarch butterfly

Housing.  Remember the old maxim -- repeating the same actions expecting different results is crazy.  So far what I've heard from Labour is the same thing I heard from the Tories:  set targets for housing; make planning easier; build in the...

Show full comment

Housing.  Remember the old maxim -- repeating the same actions expecting different results is crazy.  So far what I've heard from Labour is the same thing I heard from the Tories:  set targets for housing; make planning easier; build in the green belt.

This will not solve the problem.  1) The majority of homes are built by only 6 companies.  Why would they be willing to build so many houses so fast that prices will come down -- and so will their profits?  They are already sitting on more than 900,000 sites they've not yet built on.  And they are building fewer houses because they are not seeing the market demand. 2) If land has to be bought at a price including "hope value" (i.e., the value of the land with permission for housing vs the value of the land without such permission), it will always make building too expensive for affordable housing.  I thought Labour were going to address hope value, but if they only claim a part of the increase, it will still not be financially viable to build affordable housing.  3) We are completely schizophrenic about house prices -- homeowners go nuts if prices don't keep rising.  In short, we need a different model for building affordable housing and different organisations to do it.  And then we need more skilled workers to be able actually to ramp up the number of home completions.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Sumatran elephant

A successful economy should be safe- my family used to spend a fortune -restaurants -theatre-concerts etc etc etc current spend £0-it is no longer safe for women. 

Show full comment

A successful economy should be safe- my family used to spend a fortune -restaurants -theatre-concerts etc etc etc current spend £0-it is no longer safe for women. 

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Monarch butterfly

I want growth but I also want green -- very disappointed to read that Labour will not necessarily oppose a 3rd runway at Heathrow.  Growing aviation is the wrong way to go.  We should stop subsidizing the airline industry for a start --...

Show full comment

I want growth but I also want green -- very disappointed to read that Labour will not necessarily oppose a 3rd runway at Heathrow.  Growing aviation is the wrong way to go.  We should stop subsidizing the airline industry for a start -- stop the VAT exemption of aviation fuel.  That would also help the country's finances.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Staghorn coral

It's not possible to have growth while hampering growth.

Avatar for - Amur leopard

Rent control now! My age group (20-30olds) is not benefitting from the economy AT ALL. Our wages have been squeezed for years now, we pay average of 70% of our salaries to private landlords and utility bills, we have no prospects of owning...

Show full comment

Rent control now! My age group (20-30olds) is not benefitting from the economy AT ALL. Our wages have been squeezed for years now, we pay average of 70% of our salaries to private landlords and utility bills, we have no prospects of owning a home unless you've got some inheritance money from relatives and joined income with your partner and you can forget about it if you want to do it on your own. Tax system in this country needs to change, there is plenty of money in London and in the UK but in the hands of the wealthy. Wealth tax and public ownership of utilities is crucial to allow other groups to thrive also. 

I'd recommend everyone reads Gary Stevenson The Trading Game and especially economists working to shape London's economic future!

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Staghorn coral

There needs to be a careful review of road speed limits. While 20mph is good on residential streets it should be 30mph on 'main' or 'through' routes. Also endless changes of the speed limit, even in a short distance, is very confusing - I...

Show full comment

There needs to be a careful review of road speed limits. While 20mph is good on residential streets it should be 30mph on 'main' or 'through' routes. Also endless changes of the speed limit, even in a short distance, is very confusing - I can think of several places where the limit changes several times in a short distance for no logical reason. Fining drivers for every minor error (such as not turning right from a right turning lane, is draconian), and creating illogical road changes (ie. no left turn) and collecting vast sums in fines from drivers who fail to understand the strange rule. Money from these fines is money not spent in local businesses - and takes no account of ability to pay.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Vaquita

Enfield has gone steadily down hill in the thirty plus years I have been living here, with loss of quality independent shops and business and replacement with fast food outlets, mobile phone shops estate agents and shoe shops. It's a...

Show full comment

Enfield has gone steadily down hill in the thirty plus years I have been living here, with loss of quality independent shops and business and replacement with fast food outlets, mobile phone shops estate agents and shoe shops. It's a fundamentally unattractive retail environment.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Staghorn coral

Local Council charges too much for parking which drives people away to neighbouring boroughs that have free and cheaper parking

Avatar for - Staghorn coral

Taxes are utterly ludicrous now - it's just theft at this point. We get poor/no services in return. Dealing with any form of local government is a Kafkaesque nightmare. It seems all government employees treat the public as a nuisance. Crime...

Show full comment

Taxes are utterly ludicrous now - it's just theft at this point. We get poor/no services in return. Dealing with any form of local government is a Kafkaesque nightmare. It seems all government employees treat the public as a nuisance. Crime is ridiculous. I am a woman and in the last few years the number of times I have been harassed, hissed at, and even followed has increased massively. I have to take taxi's home after a night out for my safety which are very expensive. The Mayor is an utter berk who accuses anyone who challenges him as being "Islamophobic". He even branded people who disagreed with him on traffic issues "Nazis". Mental. He's a joke and this city has becoming completely dysfunctional. 

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Agree with your observations

Avatar for - Adelie penguin

I would like more affordable housing in London and cheaper transport

Avatar for - Colombian spotted frog

Working in partnership can be key in getting improvements to our High Streets. Local organisation in East Finchley have come together to create a Town team to work with the Council. Plans have been drawn up by local architects to create a...

Show full comment

Working in partnership can be key in getting improvements to our High Streets. Local organisation in East Finchley have come together to create a Town team to work with the Council. Plans have been drawn up by local architects to create a new Town square. The Council are engaged but there is little investment available, Until we can get some more investment our High road could continue in steady decline. Some investment is required in the basic maintenance of street cleaning, tackling litter, fly tipping and graffiti. Increasing the population density of town centres can bring more people and spending power in but needs to address rubbish storage (not just put more bins on the street increasing  clutter) Other Council policies such as agreeing more advertising to get EV chargers on the High Road adds more clutter and creates unattractive, less accessible environments for blind and less able members of the community. Elsewhere EV chargers are placed unobtrusively underground.

Landlords are increasing rents and forcing many independent traders out of business. 

Do we need to rethink London's Edwardian Town centres? 

Green, attractive centres with spaces to dwell, for events to take place, where active travel to both get to and around with improving air quality and natural, playable spaces are provided. People will come to centres where the retail and food offer is good and the place attractive and you can meet other people.

Show less of comment


Community guidelines

Anything you publish will appear almost right away. We want anyone to feel welcome to get involved in a constructive way. Our community guidelines will help us all do this.

Read our guidelines