Planning for a better London
Closed
1955 Londoners have responded | 09/05/2025 - 22/06/2025

Discussions
Growing London’s economy is one of the Mayor’s priorities in the London Plan. It’s essential to creating good jobs, putting more money in people’s pockets, funding our public services and helping London’s communities through the cost-of-living crisis.
Planning plays a key part in this, by providing the space and infrastructure for all businesses to thrive. Help us make sure we get the balance right.
Join the conversation
Our high streets and town centres are important to London’s economy and communities. The next London Plan could take a more flexible approach to the range of businesses they provide. This could include commercial activity, such as light industrial, life sciences and laboratories, data centres, transportation and distribution centres, leisure, and circular economy activity. What do you think of this?
London has a thriving 24-hour economy and a quarter of London’s workforce (1.3 million people) regularly work between 6pm and 6am. The next London Plan could support facilities for night workers in relevant areas. This might include late-night shops, cafes, toilets, places of shelter and safe routes to public transport. What else do you think could support London’s night-time economy?
What ideas do you have for an inclusive and growing economy, that strategic planning could enable? Tell us what you think.
Natalie from City Hall’s Planning team will be reading your comments and join in the conversation. Please share as much detail as you can.
Like what others have commented? You can use the upvote or care button to show support.
Please also see and join our other discussion on 'Building more homes for Londoners'.
The discussion ran from 09 May 2025 - 22 June 2025
Closed
New for you

Connecting with nature
Updated: 27 June 2025
The Mayor's new £12m Green Roots Fund launched in June and will boost access to green spaces for all Londoners. Thanks to everyone who had their say earlier this year.

Supporting Londoners into good jobs
How could we make it easier for Londoners to find the right support for jobs, training, or careers?
Discussion | Open

Improving skills and employment in London
Your views in our short survey will inform our first-ever Inclusive Talent Strategy.
Survey | Open

Coping with hot weather in London
Share your experience of how you cope with hot weather and extreme heat in London.
Discussion | Open

Shaping London's Heat Plan
Share your experience of coping with hot weather and help inform London's new Heat Plan.
Survey | Open
Towards a new London Plan
This consultation document has been developed by the Mayor, in collaboration with Londoners, London’s boroughs, businesses, education providers, community representatives and more.
Browse the consultation documentCommunity guidelines
Anything you publish will appear almost right away. We want anyone to feel welcome to get involved in a constructive way. Our community guidelines will help us all do this.
Read our guidelines
Want to join our next discussion?
New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.
Join Talk LondonAlready have an account?
Log into your accountstevew3
Community Member 1 month agoHighly edited for space, these are bullet points that could take London toward the autonomy its governance needs if it is to be part of the C21 when it is likely metropolitan areas across the world could take on the mantle of city states in...
Show full commentHighly edited for space, these are bullet points that could take London toward the autonomy its governance needs if it is to be part of the C21 when it is likely metropolitan areas across the world could take on the mantle of city states in part replacing the nation state that become a global norm only after 1945. The economy would come under city-state governance and be democratically voted on through elections to the city-wide assembly. However, the following bullet points start from the present.
The governance of London should be changed by abolishing existing Borough Councils and replacing them with an adequately sized London Assembly, led by a First Minister (replacing the Mayoral role), equipped with tax-raising powers and operating on a legal par with the Governments of Wales and Scotland. Such a body, autonomous from Westminster regarding all domestic responsibilities and powers, could pass legislation setting its own targets for economic activity in all sectors and the social and cultural conditions within which those targets are realised. These changes are quite possible once the political will is established. The barrier is having a vastly over-centralised state supported by FPtP voting.
The present governance of London could begin the process toward democratic political and economic autonomy by establishing think tanks charged with particular sectors of socio-economic activity which would in time contribute their parts to make a Manifesto for London - in effect a detailed London Plan for autonomy and what the new London would look like. A cross-party alliance of perhaps Labour, Liberal and Green from within London would build the argument within each party, supported by popular cultural campaigns. The likelihood is that progress will be in stages, the Manifesto for London being updated by the ongoing think tanks which must be maintained as intellectual and political hubs able to keep a London Plan progressively evolving.
ThomasFlusk
Community Member 1 month agoToilets at night are so important as a capital city for citizens, night bus drivers too.
Long Otter
Community Member 1 month agoYes! It would hopefully help with some smells too...
Show full commentYes! It would hopefully help with some smells too...
Show less of commentDayvee
Community Member 1 month agoWhilst any housebuilding is welcom e, I think the emphasis should be on council housing: a huge building progam is needed. The excuse of 'No money' will be trotted out, but that didn't stop the postwar governments.What's lacking is...
Show full commentWhilst any housebuilding is welcom e, I think the emphasis should be on council housing: a huge building progam is needed. The excuse of 'No money' will be trotted out, but that didn't stop the postwar governments.What's lacking is political will since New Labour capitulated to neoliberal doctrine.
james2000
Community Member 1 month agoZero building on green belt. Free parking after 6pm and no more removing lanes or roads for cycling. Remove 20mph from all roads where average speed was above that before. Change all parking permit system to weight based.
Show full commentZero building on green belt. Free parking after 6pm and no more removing lanes or roads for cycling. Remove 20mph from all roads where average speed was above that before. Change all parking permit system to weight based.
Show less of commentBigBird
Community Member 1 month agoThe quality of high street businesses has declined a lot. Betting shops, poor signage, and dirty storefronts especially in more urban areas. There needs to be better restrictions on this.
rl93511
Community Member 1 month agoYep, and also to think about how nearby high streets and main roads can be used to serve the needs of a growing population from new developments. Adapting these declining streets is key to creating growing and thriving communities!
Show full commentYep, and also to think about how nearby high streets and main roads can be used to serve the needs of a growing population from new developments. Adapting these declining streets is key to creating growing and thriving communities!
Show less of commentFragrantPenguin
Community Member 1 month agoCAR-FREE REVOLUTION.
JB0473
Community Member 1 month agoReducing private vehicles must be done by incentivising the use of and improving the quality of transport links, not by targeting the motorist directly. There are too many areas of London with poor bus and train links and punishing...
Show full commentReducing private vehicles must be done by incentivising the use of and improving the quality of transport links, not by targeting the motorist directly. There are too many areas of London with poor bus and train links and punishing residents further must be avoided. I think many people in outer London would happily reduce or eliminate their use of personal vehicles if alternative transport was improved.
Show less of commentrl93511
Community Member 1 month agoAnd considering the accessibility needs of people who are disabled or carers for disabled people who have no option but to use private vehicles
DavidTarsh
Community Member 1 month agoThat's horrid prejudice that would harm the lives of the most disadvantaged
cck
Community Member 1 month agoMake it green!
beafriend
Community Member 1 month agoPublic transport in London is definitely not safe. I don't go out after dark if I can't drive from my home to the venue and have safe parking close by.
Show full commentPublic transport in London is definitely not safe. I don't go out after dark if I can't drive from my home to the venue and have safe parking close by.
Show less of commentMarcel
Community Member 1 month agoLooking at my local neighborhood in tower hamlets, there aren't enough commercial businesses such as shops, restaurants, cafes, and fitness venues. There are a few spaces, both old and new, which have have available for some time and have...
Show full commentLooking at my local neighborhood in tower hamlets, there aren't enough commercial businesses such as shops, restaurants, cafes, and fitness venues. There are a few spaces, both old and new, which have have available for some time and have great locations, however no one seems to want to use them to open a business. This could be due to high barriers to entry such as rent.
Perhaps the government and local councils can encourage and help businesses and local entrepreneurs to open more brick and mortar businesses through commercial rent regulations or loans.
Show less of commentbeafriend
Community Member 1 month agoIn West Norwood we have enough restaurants and shops. However, what we don't have is access, i.e. parking.
Show full commentIn West Norwood we have enough restaurants and shops. However, what we don't have is access, i.e. parking.
Show less of commentMJGS1
Community Member 1 month agoCity hall should introduce a housing taskforce, which would go around London to ensure, homes do not remain empty, as well as checking private landlords have a rental licence. The housing taskforce should have similar rights to that of law...
Show full commentCity hall should introduce a housing taskforce, which would go around London to ensure, homes do not remain empty, as well as checking private landlords have a rental licence. The housing taskforce should have similar rights to that of law enforcement and be able to force landlords to act and treat all tenants appropriately within the housing law.
The new housing taskforce can also ensure the right resident is living in the property they are renting, by ensuring the tenants identification is checked, as well as their tenancy agreement. This will then reduce tenancy fraud and illegal subletting and will also ensure homes are being let and let to the right resident.
The housing taskforce can also be used by ensuring tenants welfare and property is met to a legal standard, regarding disrepair, health and safety, antisocial behaviour or neglect.
The housing taskforce can also ensure all residential property is being used for the right purpose, and not being used for industrial use, which can cause harm to other residents, the rental property or the environment.
The housing taskforce can also ensure a fair rents policy is being implemented to all residential properties.
Show less of commentflorin
Community Member 1 month agoO imagine un punct de muncă pentru situation de urgență ce acapeaza timpu lor pierdut locuințe sociale ce uni primari care nu își respectă atribuția ca primar Consilieri care nu își ia rol lor de consilier pentru a ajuta oameni de rind...
Show full commentO imagine un punct de muncă pentru situation de urgență ce acapeaza timpu lor pierdut locuințe sociale ce uni primari care nu își respectă atribuția ca primar Consilieri care nu își ia rol lor de consilier pentru a ajuta oameni de rind săraci oameni care dorm pe străzi fără o apă multii înțeleg își consumă viața cu droguri? Dar fiecare Consilier are dreptu de a ajuta și a respecta persoana de homless așa mi s-a intimplat mie să nu fiu ajutat în seven sister de Primăria totteham hale consilieri m-au discriminat și mi-au respins ajutorul pe care eu am anutat în 2024 eram și într-o boală sănătate mintală nu a avut niciun respect eii dece oare multii Consilieri nu își respectă atribuția și sireozitatea față de Primaru Londrei dece mulți așteaptă ca primarul Londrei să li se oferă bani bunuri de care multii consilieri nu-și respectă munca cu drag succes dar fiți multii și arătați ca iubim și să iubiți Londra ca asta-i e să fim uniți nu să se discrimineze persoane de dizabilități și persoane fără adaposturi
Show less of commentTalk London
Official Representative 1 month agoHi florin
Thank you for your comment. We had to translate it but were sorry to read about your experience.
We hope you managed to find the support you were looking for? Here are some links to information and organisations that may be able to help:
Best wishes,
Talk London team
klerm
Community Member 1 month agoTown planning is too convenient a scapegoat for the failure to build affordable housing, and affordable housing is too rarely affordable, and too rarely of acceptable quality. Something needs to give in the endless pile up of property value...
Show full commentTown planning is too convenient a scapegoat for the failure to build affordable housing, and affordable housing is too rarely affordable, and too rarely of acceptable quality. Something needs to give in the endless pile up of property value and shutting out of ordinary Londonders, and the most obvious thing is the amount of domestic and office property being built in London that's empty for 90% of the year.
Show less of commentI don't want planning laws ripped up, because they make homes and public spaces worth living in. I don't want building regulations ripped up, because that leads to tragedies like Grenfell. I want London to work for the people that live in it, not investors and speculators. There's no need to build in green belts, unless the London Plan is too weak to challenge the empty buildings owned by millionaires and billionaires in the centre. To do that will just make the problem worse, and push ordinary Londoners farther and farther out, whilst the centre becomes a playground for the disinterested ultra-rich.
darren12
Community Member 1 month agoThe greenbelt needs to be made more environmentally important and used to promote biodiversity by planting meadows, wildflowers, creating woodland, lakes, reservoirs etc. Currently, acres of empty green fields are just a waste of vital land...
Show full commentThe greenbelt needs to be made more environmentally important and used to promote biodiversity by planting meadows, wildflowers, creating woodland, lakes, reservoirs etc. Currently, acres of empty green fields are just a waste of vital land.
There are so many empty sites in London including those with planning permission that are just standing idle. These developers/owners should be made to develop or to sell. We also have a lot of old estates that are no longer fit for purpose and should be regenerated.
Show less of commentThere needs to be more ideas on how to build and develop as we often end up with copy and paste developments with no consideration of creating an attractive environment and an area people can enjoy living and socialising in. People also need to feel safe and anti-social behaviour and crime is ruining many parts of London.
johnnyrsb
Community Member 1 month agoInteresting point, my view is that the land you are talking about can be split two ways. Some can be allowed for development and other should be developed as you say into space for children or wildlife.
Show full commentInteresting point, my view is that the land you are talking about can be split two ways. Some can be allowed for development and other should be developed as you say into space for children or wildlife.
Show less of comment1968
Community Member 1 month agoThe undesirable people are those who create nuisance and carry out stabbings on the public transport. Like the two 16 year olds stabbing in south london.
lillydoe
Community Member 1 month agoIn all honesty I just want to be able to afford a house in the town I was born in, on a salary that is more than double the median UK average salary. That’s all I have to contribute. Please fix the state of London housing. Please.
Show full commentIn all honesty I just want to be able to afford a house in the town I was born in, on a salary that is more than double the median UK average salary. That’s all I have to contribute. Please fix the state of London housing. Please.
Show less of comment1968
Community Member 1 month agoBetter bus service and tube trains with more police protection and surveillance to deter undesirable elements targeting the travelling public. More police patrols near the stations and more manned CCTV in remote locations.
FelixAJ
Community Member 1 month agoWhat makes a person undesirable? We all have the right to use public space.
Sacha
Community Member 1 month agoI would categorise such "undesirables" asg generally having a proclivity to wards commiting crime, and an aversion towards earning an honest wage.
chbagr
Community Member 1 month agoFirst, why haven’t we helped our existing businesses support the London economy? We are in one of the biggest cities in the world, yet there is no thriving nightlife industry compared to other cities like Manchester, which has better...
Show full commentFirst, why haven’t we helped our existing businesses support the London economy? We are in one of the biggest cities in the world, yet there is no thriving nightlife industry compared to other cities like Manchester, which has better nightlife in all aspects. The reason for that is that the mayor and the locals are not supporting any nightlight venues; take a look at Hackney Council, for example, one of the strictest restrictions on new venues, so I find his headlines a bit hypocritical. Also, it’s unbelievable that the same people who have been pushing this green agenda suddenly are in favour of destroying green space. We have to protect the green ball because London is already big enough. Maybe build houses elsewhere and don’t destroy the green areas.
Show less of commentFMD
Community Member 1 month agoCulture isn’t something that happens behind ticket barriers or velvet ropes—it should be everywhere, every day, for everyone.
London is full of blank canvases—empty walls, dull walkways, grey underpasses—and they’re begging to be transformed...
Show full commentCulture isn’t something that happens behind ticket barriers or velvet ropes—it should be everywhere, every day, for everyone.
London is full of blank canvases—empty walls, dull walkways, grey underpasses—and they’re begging to be transformed. Why not open these spaces up to artists and students through structured collaborations with schools, universities, and local arts organisations? When done right, these projects don’t just beautify a space—they build confidence, connection, and pride. Young people don’t need to be paid to express themselves when institutions are investing in their growth, visibility, and opportunity.
Let’s make the city feel lived in and alive—with murals, poetry trails, mosaics, performance nooks. Public space should spark imagination, not just serve as a corridor to the nearest Pret.
We also need to protect and expand real cultural venues on high streets—places for music, dance, theatre, crafts, debate—not just entertainment for tourists or luxury pop-ups. These venues must be affordable, locally run, and integrated into community life. Creativity shouldn’t cost a fortune or require travelling zones away. Give every neighbourhood a stage and a paintbrush, not another betting shop.
Independent and grassroots initiatives need space, not just lip service. Planning should support meanwhile-use projects, rent protections for creative hubs, and long-term cultural strategies rooted in local needs—not dictated by market forces.
More art. More colour. More joy. Culture isn’t a luxury—it’s the heartbeat of a shared city.
Show less of commentFMD
Community Member 1 month agoLondon needs more than just green ambitions—it needs green realities, rooted in the lives of the people who actually live here.
We don’t just need more parks—we need to protect and expand the ones we’ve got. Green spaces aren’t decorative...
Show full commentLondon needs more than just green ambitions—it needs green realities, rooted in the lives of the people who actually live here.
We don’t just need more parks—we need to protect and expand the ones we’ve got. Green spaces aren’t decorative extras; they’re vital lungs for our city, especially in areas facing both overheating and overdevelopment. Every time we lose a patch of grass or woodland “to make room for housing,” we’re not solving a crisis—we’re shifting it.
We must stop pushing housing to the edges while leaving the centre reserved for wealth. Communities shouldn’t be priced out of the places they work, study, or grew up in, just because homes only get built miles away and greenery is treated as optional.
Let’s reimagine the city’s very fabric—greener streets, not just greener zones. Pedestrianised avenues should be shaded with trees, not flanked by concrete. Roads should bloom: planters, pocket parks, wildflower corridors that soften harsh edges, cool the air, and absorb surface water. Green infrastructure helps reduce deadly heatwaves and lowers the risk of urban flooding—essential as the climate shifts.
Unused walls, rooftops, railway arches—let’s cover them in green. Vertical gardens, climbing plants, and community food growing don’t just look good—they manage rainwater, clean the air, and bring nature into daily life.
Strategic planning should champion a vision of a London where nature isn’t banished—it’s built in. Not tomorrow. Now.
Show less of commentFMD
Community Member 1 month agoIf the goal is a “thriving, inclusive economy,” then we need to talk about power, and who gets shut out.
Developers currently have too much say in both the narrative and the outcomes. “Viability” loopholes have made a mockery of affordable...
Show full commentIf the goal is a “thriving, inclusive economy,” then we need to talk about power, and who gets shut out.
Developers currently have too much say in both the narrative and the outcomes. “Viability” loopholes have made a mockery of affordable housing—30% isn’t enough, and even that’s rarely truly affordable. The people building London, working in it, caring for it, can’t live in it. Strategic planning should reverse this imbalance, not reinforce it.
High streets need protection, not just flexibility. We’ve already seen the damage caused when “mixed-use” becomes a cover for slow-motion gentrification. Strip away workshops, bakeries, rehearsal rooms, and you don’t get a creative city—you get a sterile, overpriced corridor of Deliveroo kitchens and mini-chain cafés. Planning must prioritise independent businesses, social enterprises, and cooperatives—with rent controls and right-to-return clauses when areas are redeveloped.
Ownership matters. If the next London Plan is serious about community wealth, it must actively support cooperative models, community land trusts, and mutualised enterprise zones. These models don’t just redistribute profit—they keep wealth circulating within communities, build long-term resilience, and give residents actual democratic control over place-making.
The night-time economy doesn’t just mean more hours of capitalism. A proper 24-hour city needs independent venues, queer spaces, safe transport, staffed toilets, shelter options, and dignified working conditions. If all that survives past midnight is logistics hubs and a few chain bars, then it’s not a night-time economy—it’s just exploitation on a later shift.
Planning must stop being neutral. It either upholds inequality or redistributes power. We need a Plan that isn’t afraid to say no to the kind of growth that hollowed out boroughs, sold off land, and left communities fighting for scraps.
Prioritise people, not profits. Give communities the tools and the space to build a city that actually lives.
Show less of commentDayvee
Community Member 1 month agoWell said! 👏🏻👏🏻