Have your say on London's budget for 2022–23

The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has published his draft spending plans for the Greater London Authority (GLA) Group. Tell us what you think.

User Image for
Added by Talk London

The proposed 2022–23 GLA Group budget aims to get London back on its feet and recover from the pandemic. It centres around the Mayor’s priorities and the issues that matter most to Londoners:  

  • investing more in the police  
  • supporting our transport network  
  • building more genuinely affordable homes for Londoners 
  • supporting businesses during this difficult time 
  • skilling up Londoners for well-paid jobs 
  • tackling air pollution and the climate emergency 
  • providing more opportunities for young Londoners to reach their full potential.   

Find out more about what’s in the 2022–23 GLA Group draft budget below and have your say in the discussion at the end.  

The pandemic continues to create financial challenges and uncertainty. On top of that, a lack of government funding to support key public services is seriously impacting the GLA Group. It particularly affects Transport for London (TfL), the Met Police and London Fire Brigade.    

That is why the Mayor is proposing to increase council tax next year by £31.93 a year on average (or £2.66 per month). This is a similar increase to last year, and it includes: 

  • A £20 increase to help prevent the collapse of TfL. This was forced by the government to raise additional revenue to make up for the lower fare income following the pandemic.
  • A £10 increase to raise an additional £38.5 million for the Met Police. This will be used to fund frontline police officers, to tackle serious violent crime and violence against women and girls, and to support crime prevention programmes.
  • A £1.93 increase to support London Fire Brigade to ensure it can quickly respond to major fires and make the changes needed after the Grenfell Tower Inquiry.

To build a brighter and better future, the proposed spending plans include: 

  • £874 million to support the Met Police and £421 million for London Fire Brigade. This will keep London safe by being tough on crime and the causes of crime and ensuring the Met and London Fire Brigade have the resources they need to serve Londoners effectively. 
  • £4 billion to continue building the affordable housing London needs over the period 2021–26.  
  • £2 billion to support TfL through the financial crisis caused by the pandemic.
  • Just over £350 million to directly support London’s economy and skill up Londoners in 2022–23.
  • On average £20 million a year to develop a Green New Deal over the next three years. The deal will focus on decarbonising our city and supporting the creation of tens of thousands of new jobs, as well as continuing our work to clean up London’s toxic air and tackle climate change.
  • £13 million in 2022–23 to develop a New Deal for Young People, who are among the hardest hit by this crisis. This will create opportunities and support to ensure every young person can get on and make the most of their talents.

Read the draft budget in full.

Find out more about what the budget pays for and how it’s set. 

The discussion ran from 06 January 2022 - 30 January 2022

Closed


Want to join our next discussion?

New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.

Join Talk London

Already have an account?

Log into your account
Comments (227)

Avatar for - American pika

These affordable homes are not given to Londoners on a waiting list or rough sleepers. So called asylum seekers are given given first priority for accommodation they are causing the housing shortages around the UK adding to the population...

Show full comment

These affordable homes are not given to Londoners on a waiting list or rough sleepers. So called asylum seekers are given given first priority for accommodation they are causing the housing shortages around the UK adding to the population. and putting local councils under pressure to build thousands of homes everywhere. countryside woodland and green belt will vanish including wildlife animals pushed to extinction. People are already experiencing wildlife animals entering their properties to find warmth because their habitats are been destroyed on a daily basis for large housing developments . In a 100 years time the whole of the United Kingdom will look like a third world slum. Not that khan or the FAR LEFT care

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Tiger

That is the problem with London we have a mayor who hates the motorist for some reason they make money from them because they don’t have a choice it is like picking on the vulnerable I was a labour voter all my life until the last mayoral...

Show full comment

That is the problem with London we have a mayor who hates the motorist for some reason they make money from them because they don’t have a choice it is like picking on the vulnerable I was a labour voter all my life until the last mayoral election and I voted for someone else because of his constant attacks on the motorist

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Sumatran elephant

Completely unacceptable! If the mayor is honest about helping the Londoners than he shouldn’t suggest such increase in council tax. My Labour council isn’t doing anything for the people why should I pay more for TFL?? Not my responsibility...

Show full comment

Completely unacceptable! If the mayor is honest about helping the Londoners than he shouldn’t suggest such increase in council tax. My Labour council isn’t doing anything for the people why should I pay more for TFL?? Not my responsibility.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Totally incompetent transport policy - wasting untold millions on road traffic schemes, particularly cycle lanes, and pricing Londoners out of going into town with the extended hours and massive increase in the congestion charge.
Redress...

Show full comment

Totally incompetent transport policy - wasting untold millions on road traffic schemes, particularly cycle lanes, and pricing Londoners out of going into town with the extended hours and massive increase in the congestion charge.
Redress the balance and give the motorist some breaks!

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Adelie penguin

Hi,

Are you aware that 60% of Londoners don't even own a car - overwhelmingly the young, the poor, and disadvantaged ethnic minorities? I think rather than catering to the upper middle classes by tearing out cycle lanes and pavements to...

Show full comment

Hi,

Are you aware that 60% of Londoners don't even own a car - overwhelmingly the young, the poor, and disadvantaged ethnic minorities? I think rather than catering to the upper middle classes by tearing out cycle lanes and pavements to replace with car lanes, we should keep London accessible to all with robust public transport and active travel solutions. Meanwhile thousands of us die prematurely each year due to air pollution.

If we're pricing Londoners out of driving into central London (a totally ludicrous proposition, have you seen how congested it is and how good the tube network is?) then it's working as intended. What do you think a congestion charge is for?

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I don't understand how giving a frankly eye-watering £800m+ to the police will help solve 'the causes of crime'. The bulk of this money would surely be better allocated towards community support, into the New Deal for Young People or...

Show full comment

I don't understand how giving a frankly eye-watering £800m+ to the police will help solve 'the causes of crime'. The bulk of this money would surely be better allocated towards community support, into the New Deal for Young People or anything that will actually support citizens rather than further enable the police force.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Sumatran elephant

We have those services for a decade now and the crime rates are increasing every year since 2016. That should tell something to somebody above us.

Show full comment

We have those services for a decade now and the crime rates are increasing every year since 2016. That should tell something to somebody above us.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I do not Live in London however i travel there at least twice a month with work and i hate driving in the centre which i always try to avoid if i can as you can not fart with out getting caught, I agree with a lot of comments on here ie all...

Show full comment

I do not Live in London however i travel there at least twice a month with work and i hate driving in the centre which i always try to avoid if i can as you can not fart with out getting caught, I agree with a lot of comments on here ie all the extra cycle lanes and which idiots thought it was a good idea to build some in the middle of the roads, a lot of cyclists and people on scooters are Idiots and have no road sense at all and all and i am surprised more are not killed every year as they just weave in and out of the traffic, also damaging cars as they do so, Transport for London and the Mayor are a joke and just think about making money they also do not cater for people outside of London and how the people that live there i do not know how they manage, some of the roads and the junctions off them are a pain more so when its busy and if you don't know the area and have to change lanes half way round them and cant so end up the wrong way and have to back track or find another route. My last trip just before Christmas i ended up near Hyde park going from south West London to go back north a journey of about 20 mins took me 2 hours, hence why i visit London for Pleasure i book and stay outside and use the bus as it is easier and cheaper, All this congestion charging and the low emission zones are a joke and just a rip off, as i feel it does not make a difference and the amount of busses on the roads can not be doing any good.

Regards Tony

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Adelie penguin

"I do not Live in London however i travel there at least twice a month with work"
"they...do not cater for people outside of London"

Hi Tony,

London's roads aren't for you. They're for its residents, 60% of whom don't even own a car. For...

Show full comment

"I do not Live in London however i travel there at least twice a month with work"
"they...do not cater for people outside of London"

Hi Tony,

London's roads aren't for you. They're for its residents, 60% of whom don't even own a car. For those residents, cycle lanes and walkable pavements are life. They give us the freedom we need to get around London.

I'm sorry you're finding it harder to get into central London in a pollution-emitting car (something that kills thousands of Londoners prematurely a year). But that's exactly the point. In fact when you say "[when] i visit London for Pleasure i book and stay outside and use the bus as it is easier and cheaper", that proves these schemes are working.

Have you tried getting the train into London instead? It's a much nicer experience, you can read a book or watch out the window.

"as they just weave in and out of the traffic" - yes, so let's build more segregated cycle lanes to keep them out of the way of motor traffic!

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Sea turtle

Regarding air pollution , the expansion and building of second incinerator in Belvedere , east london should have been stopped.
This area is just upcoming with crossrail expansion to nearby abbey wood.
Residents will now have this new...

Show full comment

Regarding air pollution , the expansion and building of second incinerator in Belvedere , east london should have been stopped.
This area is just upcoming with crossrail expansion to nearby abbey wood.
Residents will now have this new eyesore along with pollution.
Such a facillity, should be belt far away from large residential population.
I understand the mayor tried to stop this and the goverment proceeded , I belive the mayor should try harder to stop this and then will win my vote.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Tiger

Are you having a laugh a good mayor he has alienated every motorist in London with his policies all he worries about is cycle lanes that cause more congestion and pollution because of backed up traffic and which are empty most of the time...

Show full comment

Are you having a laugh a good mayor he has alienated every motorist in London with his policies all he worries about is cycle lanes that cause more congestion and pollution because of backed up traffic and which are empty most of the time people cant afford to come in to London so less people spending which effects the economy of London just look at the big drop in footfall in central London

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Adelie penguin

"he has alienated every motorist in London"

I hope you're aware that 60% of Londoners don't even own a car. And that he was elected on a manifesto calling for more active travel like cycle lanes - chosen by Londoners to do the things he's...

Show full comment

"he has alienated every motorist in London"

I hope you're aware that 60% of Londoners don't even own a car. And that he was elected on a manifesto calling for more active travel like cycle lanes - chosen by Londoners to do the things he's doing.

"just look at the big drop in footfall in central London"

Hmmm I wonder if there have been any unprecedented global events recently which could have caused this?

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Tiger

I agree with 'gjc', Sadiq Khan is doing remarkably well in the face of a hostile and incompetent national Government that constantly strives to undermine him, and us, the people/ratepayers of London.
His budget is indeed realistic in the...

Show full comment

I agree with 'gjc', Sadiq Khan is doing remarkably well in the face of a hostile and incompetent national Government that constantly strives to undermine him, and us, the people/ratepayers of London.
His budget is indeed realistic in the current given circumstances.
My only criticism is far too many (and too large) cycle lanes which very few cyclists actually use!

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I think Lee43's last point here hits the nail on the head as far as cycle lanes are concerned. The westbound lane on Euston Road set up earlier in the pandemic backed buses and other traffic up as far as Gray's Inn Road and was sensibly...

Show full comment

I think Lee43's last point here hits the nail on the head as far as cycle lanes are concerned. The westbound lane on Euston Road set up earlier in the pandemic backed buses and other traffic up as far as Gray's Inn Road and was sensibly abandoned -- but the enormous eastbound lane (which is hardly used at all) causes backups from Regent's Park to King's Cross and results in a lot of cars AND buses idling in place and throwing off a lot of emissions. No wonder cyclists avoid that stretch when there are more pleasant and less polluted alternatives nearby e.g. along Tavistock Place. I think the aspiration is terrific but the implementation poorly thought out. This is one example among many; I live in North London but have seen similar problems elsewhere e.g. in Clapham and other parts of town.

Furthermore, the communication about using public transport has been all over the map in the last two years -- avoid the Tube, please use the Tube, please DON'T use the Tube, the Tube is safe, the Tube isn't safe, and on and on.

I also agree with Lee43 in that in most other respects this is a sensible budget implemented at a difficult time. I'm not at all sure what the person who said that "TfL isn't my problem" or something to that effect meant. Does this person walk EVERYWHERE? Meanwhile, if fares aren't covering the cost of the network are we meant to ask people from York or Penzance to subsidise the system?

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Sumatran elephant

Furball has hit the nail on the head; the mayor gets the blame for the TfL fiasco when, in reality, the situation has been directly brought about by a fiercely hostile government which is trying its hardest to undermine Sadiq Khan without...

Show full comment

Furball has hit the nail on the head; the mayor gets the blame for the TfL fiasco when, in reality, the situation has been directly brought about by a fiercely hostile government which is trying its hardest to undermine Sadiq Khan without caring about the consequences of their political shenanigans for those of us who depend on the tube and bus network.
This is a realistic budget given the constraints forced on the GLA and I hope that in 2022 our mayor gets more credit than he's been given up to now, for how well he's coped with everything that's come at him.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Adelie penguin

TfL is as poorly managed as the rest of the mayors office, they waste millions of pounds propping up failing 3rd party companies profit margins and then cry that central government and tax payers should throw more money at them! The mayors...

Show full comment

TfL is as poorly managed as the rest of the mayors office, they waste millions of pounds propping up failing 3rd party companies profit margins and then cry that central government and tax payers should throw more money at them! The mayors budgeting ability is non-existent! He is just desperate to blame everything on central government when in reality the failing is his and the people he has running and negotiating the 3rd party inflated contracts. That out their profits as the most important and the people they are serving bottom of the pile. No support for the police, no clue on how to best support environmental concerns other than more wasted cycle lanes which just increase journey times for cars, buses and lorries which adds to the pollution but he is ok with that as long as you put coffers in his pot with the Congestion and ULEZ charges. The mayor like his party is wasteful and when there is no money tried to tell people it’s everyone else’s fault but their mismanagement. The budgets many of these companies have would be adequate for a better service than we receive if they were to stop being fleeced by 3rd parties and were to get proper value for money.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Tiger

This mayor has not got a clue he moans that tfl had no money and he doesn’t realise the people he asked to get to work by bike are the thousands who used to use public transport. His green agenda is rubbish if he was concerned he would ban...

Show full comment

This mayor has not got a clue he moans that tfl had no money and he doesn’t realise the people he asked to get to work by bike are the thousands who used to use public transport. His green agenda is rubbish if he was concerned he would ban polluting cars from London but they can still drive into London if they pay for the pleasure how does that make sense

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Tiger

I’m

Avatar for - Adelie penguin

The problem is not the money, it’s how it’s spent. Affordable housing that is anything but affordable and most of the time barely fit for purpose if at all, wastage on paying hiked pricing to so called preferred suppliers who give no value...

Show full comment

The problem is not the money, it’s how it’s spent. Affordable housing that is anything but affordable and most of the time barely fit for purpose if at all, wastage on paying hiked pricing to so called preferred suppliers who give no value for money. The fares are down for TFL but the companies running the services aren’t meeting the standards required yet we get to pay more for them. Millions to develop a green deal that won’t work and will cause more delays and pollution by lengthening journeys. Even the budget outline is just a political statement rather than stressing why this increase is really needed, a disgraceful proposal from a disgraceful mayor. The sooner he is gone and someone with a clue how to budget and run a city properly the better.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Pangolin

I hope the £4bn for "affordable" housing will be invested in housing that is really affordable to working people, i.e. at a "social" housing rent.

Show full comment

I hope the £4bn for "affordable" housing will be invested in housing that is really affordable to working people, i.e. at a "social" housing rent.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Yes the Council Tax increase is necessary, and at least we know what it will be spent on. The best course of action for Londoners is to vote the Tories out of office. The current government has turned funding Transport and other London...

Show full comment

Yes the Council Tax increase is necessary, and at least we know what it will be spent on. The best course of action for Londoners is to vote the Tories out of office. The current government has turned funding Transport and other London services into political issues when they are actually economic issues vital to the whole country.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

You will find that Labour is in control of London so the Tories don't need to be voted out. No matter who is in control what we need is a party/person that will spend the money wisely. Unfortunately the Labour party has not got a good...

Show full comment

You will find that Labour is in control of London so the Tories don't need to be voted out. No matter who is in control what we need is a party/person that will spend the money wisely. Unfortunately the Labour party has not got a good record on this front. I state Croydon as a typical example. A bankrupt council. Out sourcing which is a general practice on many Labour councils has proved to be a financial disaster for the services provided and to the council budgets.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Monarch butterfly

Training for young people ( and others) should focus on skills for a circular and sustainable economy in particular there seems to be a massive skill shortage in the area of retrofitting housing and insulation installation ( cladding etc)...

Show full comment

Training for young people ( and others) should focus on skills for a circular and sustainable economy in particular there seems to be a massive skill shortage in the area of retrofitting housing and insulation installation ( cladding etc) esp for the huge stock of Victorian & Edwardian housing that London has. Fuel poverty and net zero will not end without insulating our housing stock & we need to get on with it rapidly.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Too much outsourcing of services leads to higher profits for private companies and lesser services. You only have to look at what Violia providing for Merton to see that. Bring important services back in house and provide the quality of...

Show full comment

Too much outsourcing of services leads to higher profits for private companies and lesser services. You only have to look at what Violia providing for Merton to see that. Bring important services back in house and provide the quality of service that the same money would provide.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Tiger

I agree with BigAl'sDad. Not everything can be solved by outsourcing. I'm not against any private company providing a service, as long as it's at least as good, or better, than the one it's replacing and at a reasonable cost, even if this...

Show full comment

I agree with BigAl'sDad. Not everything can be solved by outsourcing. I'm not against any private company providing a service, as long as it's at least as good, or better, than the one it's replacing and at a reasonable cost, even if this is at a slight increase. However, what we often get is a service which is poorer and at a substantially higher cost. It is an immutable fact, that if you have to include a 'middle man', cost will invariably rise. Would public services be any more expensive if you added the profit made by private firms now, to the cost when these services were provided by London Boroughs, 'in-house'. How might these compare?

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Adelie penguin

Everything is profits first and service levels last! Yet it seems all the councils and mayors office want to do is push everything out to a 3rd party who charges double the price for everything for half the service and then puts their hand...

Show full comment

Everything is profits first and service levels last! Yet it seems all the councils and mayors office want to do is push everything out to a 3rd party who charges double the price for everything for half the service and then puts their hand out for more when they don’t meet the lower standards they agreed to meet! TfL and the other departments should be held to account and not allowed to bail out their 3rd party supplier chums to support their profit margins!

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Sea turtle

Please extend the ULEZ Ultra Low Emission Zone to the M25 for it to have a really positive impact.

Show full comment

Please extend the ULEZ Ultra Low Emission Zone to the M25 for it to have a really positive impact.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Although the ULEZ are a way of reducing pollution it is not the most efficient way to do it. I know it raises taxes and I sometime wonder whether this is the ulterior motive. The best way to reduce pollution from cars is to give give...

Show full comment

Although the ULEZ are a way of reducing pollution it is not the most efficient way to do it. I know it raises taxes and I sometime wonder whether this is the ulterior motive. The best way to reduce pollution from cars is to give give subsides or grants towards the cost of changing. Not just to buy one but to exchange a carbon fuel vehicle for an electric one. If the electric vehicles were cheaper to but then I am sure more people would change, I know I would.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Adelie penguin

£2.66 per month increase Council Tax, they may not be a big amount to many people if your earnings is enough for all these increases,it will not affect high earners. we have energy bills increasing and the Tax which has to be paid in April...

Show full comment

£2.66 per month increase Council Tax, they may not be a big amount to many people if your earnings is enough for all these increases,it will not affect high earners. we have energy bills increasing and the Tax which has to be paid in April, that is without cost of living such as food and the water rate will increase, and the yearly rent increase and probably other increases, I really don’t know how we are expected to find the money for this.
I am retired, my husband should have retired 10 years ago he is now 75 and only earns a low wage, although earnings are low we cannot afford for him to retire as we could not exist on State pensions.
I don’t know what the answer is but we are struggling like many other people.
My husband has to buy a Oyster card just to go to work because he travels before 9am at a cost to him. This is because you stopped free travel before 9am every day.
IT SEEMS ALL TAKE BUT NOTHING GIVEN BACK.
VERY WORRYING TIMES.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Hi Henry46

Thank you for sharing your experience in this discussion. We’re sorry to hear this and hope you are able to seek support when needed.

You can find some helpful information about financial support you may be entitled to on this City Hall web page: https://www.london.gov.uk/coronavirus/financial-support-during-coronavi…

We would also recommend contacting your local Citizens Advice centre for information, if you haven’t already: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/

Talk London

Avatar for - Leatherback sea turtle

Please offer affordable housing for flats and houses that are freehold, not shared ownership, and don't have extortionate maintenance and management annual fees.
Why are regular people paying higher council tax in 2022 instead of taxing...

Show full comment

Please offer affordable housing for flats and houses that are freehold, not shared ownership, and don't have extortionate maintenance and management annual fees.
Why are regular people paying higher council tax in 2022 instead of taxing the top 5% or 10% of the people with millions, like ceos. Or taxing the millionaires abroad who have purchased tons of property in central London and driven up prices.

Show less of comment