Environment, transport and clean air
Have your say on the proposed spending plans for the environment, transport and clean air in this year's Budget 2020-21.
The environment is a priority area for you, ranked as the 4th highest area for improvement. Clean air is your biggest concern, with two thirds of you dissatisfied with air quality (67%). Your next biggest concern is the provision of low carbon and renewable energy sources, followed by reducing waste and increasing recycling.
In the Priorities for Londoners survey, you ranked transport as London's third highest performing area overall, behind culture and sport and inclusivity. 44% of you are satisfied with the city’s transport offer. You are most satisfied with the frequency, safety and reliability of public transport; meanwhile, affordability and the provision of greener public transport are your two biggest areas for improvement.
Over the last three years:
- The Mayor has frozen Transport for London (TfL) fares for the fourth year running, and introduced the unlimited Hopper bus fare
- The ultra-low emission zone (ULEZ) has been introduced, with the aim of reducing air pollution and congestion in central London. The first stage of the ULEZ is already having real impacts on air quality, with roadside nitrogen dioxide pollution reducing by around a third in the central London zone
The discussion ran from 07 January 2020 - 24 February 2020
Closed
Want to join our next discussion?
New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.
Join Talk LondonAlready have an account?
Log into your accountIzabella
Community Member 5 years agoI agree with all the comments posted. We need action on air pollution! It is killing us! How much more serious can this be? Act now!
Show full commentI agree with all the comments posted. We need action on air pollution! It is killing us! How much more serious can this be? Act now!
Show less of commentgriffitr
Community Member 5 years agoI agree with most posters here who insist that the Mayor's plans are inadequate. We need a much more ambitious plan to cut pollution and CO2; increase trees and vegetation and encourage healthier life styles.
BUT THIS IS HARDLY THE ISSUE...
Show full commentI agree with most posters here who insist that the Mayor's plans are inadequate. We need a much more ambitious plan to cut pollution and CO2; increase trees and vegetation and encourage healthier life styles.
BUT THIS IS HARDLY THE ISSUE! We are all just making comments on a website in isolation with no power to make any change.
We need the Mayor to set up a Citizens' Assembly where we can discuss the issues, come to conclusions and enforce the outcomes.
As7263
Community Member 5 years agoAir pollution is killing Londoners. We are 25 times more likely to be killed by air pollution-related diseases than by traffic accidents. Toxic particle levels in the air are consistently and drastically way over they environmental...
Show full commentAir pollution is killing Londoners. We are 25 times more likely to be killed by air pollution-related diseases than by traffic accidents. Toxic particle levels in the air are consistently and drastically way over they environmental standards for toxic air set by the world health organisation. The only reason this isn’t a bigger issue is because it’s invisible killer. You need to take more serious action on this
Diesel cars should not be allowed in London. There should be an increase in charges for heavier lorries/SUVs.
More cycle lanes that are separated from the road
Set up schemes/incentives to encourage children to cycle/walk to school
Dramatically increase the road tax on SUVs. Having these on the road discourages cyclists and is polluting the air we breathe.
Show less of commenttclemins
Community Member 5 years ago1. imperative to remove the diesel black cabs from the road and replace with all electric fleet
2. accelerate the bus electification schedule
3. aggressive public campaign needed to reduce waste and increase recycling so more are...
Show full comment1. imperative to remove the diesel black cabs from the road and replace with all electric fleet
2. accelerate the bus electification schedule
3. aggressive public campaign needed to reduce waste and increase recycling so more are encouraged to take seriously
4. protect current green spaces and increase these spaces throughout the city
5. sharply increase road tax or usage charges for heavier and dirtier vehicles ie SUV who are hard wearing on roads and polluting
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 5 years agoYou should be far more aggressive with the bus electrification targets. I know it wont be easy but Chinese cities have proven it is possible and we need to electrify the whole fleet by 2030 not 2037. Voters will thank you for it. Electric...
Show full commentYou should be far more aggressive with the bus electrification targets. I know it wont be easy but Chinese cities have proven it is possible and we need to electrify the whole fleet by 2030 not 2037. Voters will thank you for it. Electric buses are so much better on almost every level and it is a big part of daily life for Londoners. Switching the fleet will make our streets quieter and cleaner and the investment will pay for itself eventually if planned well.
Also need to do something about decarbonising heating for the building stock. This is an unbelievably huge challenge and you need to allocate from money to range of pilots and trialls so may deployment of retrofits can start as soon as possible.
Show less of commentDukwski
Community Member 5 years agoThe congestion in London is terrible. The roads are clogged up with cars doing unnecessary journeys. The cycle superhighways are not utilised for most of the day. Coaches bringing tourists to London are unable to park & have to drive around...
Show full commentThe congestion in London is terrible. The roads are clogged up with cars doing unnecessary journeys. The cycle superhighways are not utilised for most of the day. Coaches bringing tourists to London are unable to park & have to drive around for ages looking for somewhere to park.
Why not make the Embankment cycle superhighway time dependent, like some bus lanes? For instance, from 07.00 to 10.00 (or evern 10.30) they should be cycles only. From 10.00 to 14.00 (or even 13.30) they could go back to being coach bays. From 14.00 to 19.00 cycle bays & then again in the evening, they could be coach bays. The vast majority of tourist coaches are in London from about 10.30-11.00 to 13.30-14.00 if bringing school groups to the museums/galleries. For evening theatre they are there from about 19.00 to about 22.00. By doing this, the coaches would not be driving around in slow moving traffic, contributing to pollution & would have somewhere to park. The underutilised space of the cycle lane would be properly utilised & the coach operators & drivers might have more reason to not boycott London. If the bays were properly "policed" re charging, then there would be an income stream too. Coaches bringing people to matinees would not benefit from this.
Coaches bring large numbers of people to London, along with their money.
Getting the coaches parked up during the day without having to drive around for ages would improve the environment, improve the drivers' mental health, allow other vehicles, such as delivery trucks to move more freely around the city. Everyone's a winner. The few cyclists who use these cycle lanes during the day would have to just use the main road, but then I gather that that's what most of them do anyway & the superhighways almost never have bikes in them anyway
Show less of commentSomeone
Community Member 5 years agoOne reason cycle tracks are not filled to capacity is that they aren't part of a proper joined-up network. Most people can't get to a track without mixing with motor traffic, so don't cycle at all. The existing cycle traffic is mainly...
Show full commentOne reason cycle tracks are not filled to capacity is that they aren't part of a proper joined-up network. Most people can't get to a track without mixing with motor traffic, so don't cycle at all. The existing cycle traffic is mainly battle-hardened commuters, many of whom don't mind riding in the carriageway. But to increase cycling, which would greatly benefit London, we need more cycle tracks, not fewer.
The pavements round my way are empty most of the time. I hope you don't favour opening them to motor traffic too.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 5 years agoYou are not doing enough to make roads safe for cyclists and pedestrians. Don't repave the road, invest in a cycle path. Bikes won't run the roads down like big SUVs. Your cycling infrastructure is appaling!
Also, please start thinking...
Show full commentYou are not doing enough to make roads safe for cyclists and pedestrians. Don't repave the road, invest in a cycle path. Bikes won't run the roads down like big SUVs. Your cycling infrastructure is appaling!
Also, please start thinking about reducing the availability of parking, reducing when deliveries can be made (especially when loading bays are on cycle paths).
In other countries, 5 year olds are expected to walk to school. The council makes the roads safe enough with a pedestrian-priority (eg zebra) crossing at every junction. Children will grow up to be adults that believe walking 1 mile is normal.
Also, it is not just about pollution but also congestion. The bigger the car (the richer you are) the more public space you take up and the more you should be charged for that. In parking and in using the streets.
Please make council tax dependent on how much energy the hoise wastes.
Show less of commentneil_wiseuk
Community Member 5 years agoWhy not do a council tax surchage for owning a vehicle - it could be zero or a discount for an electric car / bike ranging to £100's for a big range rover? There is no excuse for owning a massive car in London. Lets get SUVs off Londons...
Show full commentWhy not do a council tax surchage for owning a vehicle - it could be zero or a discount for an electric car / bike ranging to £100's for a big range rover? There is no excuse for owning a massive car in London. Lets get SUVs off Londons roads!
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 5 years agoI totally agree. They use up public space and pollute public air.
Show full commentI totally agree. They use up public space and pollute public air.
Show less of commentEuro_Star
Community Member 5 years agoIn the light of the increasing concern about the quality of the air we breathe in London, it is imperative that more resources are made available for completing projects that will improve air quality long term. The proposed Crossrail2 needs...
Show full commentIn the light of the increasing concern about the quality of the air we breathe in London, it is imperative that more resources are made available for completing projects that will improve air quality long term. The proposed Crossrail2 needs to be completed in its entirety in order to take traffic off London's roads. Introducing new pollution thresholds in Central London alone does not provide a long term solution.
Show less of commentGeorgina100
Community Member 5 years agoI would like to see additional funds available to make London a cleaner city quicker. It seems that this is acheiveable and also it is a silent and deadly concern for health. It would also make London a quieter and greener place to live.
Show full commentI would like to see additional funds available to make London a cleaner city quicker. It seems that this is acheiveable and also it is a silent and deadly concern for health. It would also make London a quieter and greener place to live.
Show less of commentrickjmills
Community Member 5 years agoULEZ extension is too soon. Asking 100000 Londoners to scrap or replace vehicles (some <5yrs old) is an environmental mistake and a burden on those who cannot afford new.
Show full commentULEZ extension is too soon. Asking 100000 Londoners to scrap or replace vehicles (some <5yrs old) is an environmental mistake and a burden on those who cannot afford new.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 5 years agothis has been a discussion for ages. and a <5yo car you can easily sell.
Show full commentthis has been a discussion for ages. and a <5yo car you can easily sell.
Show less of commentbulldogmeg
Community Member 5 years agoas per a comment below stop squeezing traffic lanes have traffic light that react to the traffic conditions and make it that any roadworks get done at night try and get traffic flowing freely to avoid fumes but no one will listen you just...
Show full commentas per a comment below stop squeezing traffic lanes have traffic light that react to the traffic conditions and make it that any roadworks get done at night try and get traffic flowing freely to avoid fumes but no one will listen you just want the emissions to keep going up so you can ban cars altogether remember your trafffic planners are going to get old one day and they may need a car to get about. no one drives in london if they dont have to .
FWeeks
Community Member 5 years agoMore should be done to separate cyclists from traffic. I speak as someone who has experienced life changing injuries from cycling in a designated "quietway" cycling route in London. The only way to make cyclists safe is to separate them...
Show full commentMore should be done to separate cyclists from traffic. I speak as someone who has experienced life changing injuries from cycling in a designated "quietway" cycling route in London. The only way to make cyclists safe is to separate them from the traffic. If cycling were safer, far more people would do it, reducing air pollution. Improvements to cycling in London have stalled in the last few years.
Show less of commentstilitz
Community Member 5 years agoThe climate change reduction and clean air targets are far too modest. A much greater sense of urgency and appropriate budget allocations are required.
Show full commentThe climate change reduction and clean air targets are far too modest. A much greater sense of urgency and appropriate budget allocations are required.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 5 years agoI agree!
Show full commentI agree!
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 5 years agoHelping Boroughs to pedestrianise shopping streets would help to take some of the fumes away from heavily used areas. Help might be financial, but could also put pressure on the strategic traffic engineers etc to find solutions, not find...
Show full commentHelping Boroughs to pedestrianise shopping streets would help to take some of the fumes away from heavily used areas. Help might be financial, but could also put pressure on the strategic traffic engineers etc to find solutions, not find problems and reasons for not doing things. Even partial timed pedestrianising could be an option, giving middle of the day shoppers respite from traffic danger and fumes. Try Wimbledon Broadway for example.
The City of London has legal powers to install their street lighting luminaires, street name plates etc onto the fronts of buildings. This is a power that other Boroughs seemingly do not have. Removing at least some of the clutter from pavements helps pedestrians, and the general appearance. Should the Mayor promote legislation to help all London Boroughs to do this?
Show less of commentUkenigma
Community Member 5 years agoULEZ is just a tax on the poor. They need to use their cars and can not afford to replace them. Forget it, scrap it and enforce better emissions standards on public transport and big business like haulage firms first.
stop putting...
Show full commentULEZ is just a tax on the poor. They need to use their cars and can not afford to replace them. Forget it, scrap it and enforce better emissions standards on public transport and big business like haulage firms first.
stop putting stupid road restrictions that cause more delays and hence more idling cars running for longer when they are most polluting, make it flow easier and road clearer
Show less of commentnetbot
Community Member 5 years agoYou focus almost entirely in persecuting motorists. The WORST pollution (which is probably the source of increased respiratory problems that you complain about) is in the underground by far. What are you doing about that? You try and force...
Show full commentYou focus almost entirely in persecuting motorists. The WORST pollution (which is probably the source of increased respiratory problems that you complain about) is in the underground by far. What are you doing about that? You try and force ever higher numbers onto that system while creating traffic jams on the roads leading to gridlock and increase pollution. You don't actually have a strategy, you are just anti-car.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 5 years agoThe London Mayor is (in the London Plan) requiring each Borough to increase its tree stocks by 10 % over the next 30 years or so. We know that we are losing trees to development, to site owners deciding to fell etc without needing any...
Show full commentThe London Mayor is (in the London Plan) requiring each Borough to increase its tree stocks by 10 % over the next 30 years or so. We know that we are losing trees to development, to site owners deciding to fell etc without needing any permission. For an average Borough, this could mean having to plant perhaps 700 new trees per year for each of the next 30 years. Some Boroughs seem to believe that planting 'whips' (young half metre high seedlings) equates to "planting a tree". Should the Mayor make clear that his Policy should be interpreted as a tree with decent canopy (usually classed as a 'Heavy Nursery Standard" with a trunk girth of no less that 16 cm)? And that if whips are planted (often by children in their school grounds, which is great) then 25 whips (or 50?) should equate with "one tree".
Show less of commentAndrew Gerstle
Community Member 5 years agoThe only way to reduce air pollution from vehicles in London is to restrict access to vehicles on the streets. Driving within zone 1 should be restricted to essential vehicles not commuters or visitors. We need a five-year plan to
1 Reduce...
Show full commentThe only way to reduce air pollution from vehicles in London is to restrict access to vehicles on the streets. Driving within zone 1 should be restricted to essential vehicles not commuters or visitors. We need a five-year plan to
1 Reduce parking in zones 1 and 2
2 Increase bus lanes and introduce express buses for commuting times
3 Restrict vehicle access to zone 1 for non essential vehicles
The only way to stop cars is to limit access to roads and parking.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 5 years ago1. The ULEZ should be expanded to the whole of Greater London.
2. There need to be more 'green walls' and other trees/plants around roads to help combat pollution. Too often Councils resist this because they have to maintain them and...
Show full comment1. The ULEZ should be expanded to the whole of Greater London.
2. There need to be more 'green walls' and other trees/plants around roads to help combat pollution. Too often Councils resist this because they have to maintain them and sweep up the leaves.
3. The planned upgrade of the trains on the Central Line is just papering over the cracks. They are noisy, shaky and shabby. The whole line needs a proper upgrade. Allowing fares to rise slightly would enable more investment in this and other lines that desperately need it.
4. Where Boroughs are poor at recycling, what help are you offering to help them meet the mayor's targets? What penalties are there for missing the targets? Without either a carrot or a stick the targets ar meaningless.
Show less of comment