London Environment Strategy consultation

Closed

1217 Londoners have responded | 26/07/2017 - 17/11/2017

London Environment Strategy consultation

A 'National Park City'

User Image for
Added by Talk London

London is already one of the greenest cities in the world. There are over 8 million trees, plus numerous parks and gardens, and an increasing number of green roofs and walls. The Mayor wants to make London the world’s first ‘National Park City’ and has plans to make 50% of the city green so that Londoners can enjoy the natural environment and make more of our outdoor spaces.

What ideas do you have for increasing green spaces in London?

Summary

On 23 February 2018 it was announced that 21-29 July will be the first ever London National Park City Week. There’ll be events and activities throughout to celebrate the capital's unique green spaces, waterways and natural environment.

The discussion ran from 10 August 2017 - 10 November 2017

Closed


Want to join our next discussion?

New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.

Join Talk London

Already have an account?

Log into your account
Comments (106)

Avatar for -

I think it would be to the benefit of many people if more London streets could be converted to be pedestrian and cycle only. It would reduce pollution, noise and danger, and give everyone a better living environment. In those streets we...

Show full comment

I think it would be to the benefit of many people if more London streets could be converted to be pedestrian and cycle only. It would reduce pollution, noise and danger, and give everyone a better living environment. In those streets we could plant more trees and bushes, and have seating areas that encourage people to enjoy the outdoor space.

I also think that noise pollution is becoming a bigger problem. This is especially true of noisy motorbikes, which when revved hard produce far more noise that cars and even buses. Can anything be done to limit their noise in central London especially?

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Monarch butterfly

Green London?

Oh, I suppose that they are actually referring mean to our central and local parks.

Despite the huge concerns of pollution and the continuing increase in mental illness nothing is actually being done to improve our...

Show full comment

Green London?

Oh, I suppose that they are actually referring mean to our central and local parks.

Despite the huge concerns of pollution and the continuing increase in mental illness nothing is actually being done to improve our environment. We all have the knowledge that nature is our greatest healer but still they refuse to plants trees, seasonal hanging baskets and various other evergreen plants in every singe part of London.

The visibility of Flora and Trees elevate the human spirits.

Even Trafalgar Square is bleak bleak bleak without Flowers, but do they care? Well, not really. These people who are responsible for our city are educated people and well travelled people but still they turn a blind eye to the importance of nature on human life. Even other city's in Europe have more flora in their pedestrian areas.

In Palmers Green N13 is a lovely residential area which is in great need of flowers and Trees, Enfield Council promised a few years ago that they will make the area ' Green' to concise with the wording of the area. Yet, nothing has materialized and I just as well that I never held my breath!

Those people responsible for our areas know full well that Evergreen Plants, Flowers, Trees are vital for a healthier living and we have plenty of garden centres that with just a call will fill the whole of this city with flora and trees (which includes local London areas of course) but their resistance is due to cost and always will be and it is not as if they is no money to spent even though they would have us believe otherwise,

What is the point of the government saving money if it is not for the benefit of it's citizens?

I just do not believe that those responsible for London love their Capital City enough. It could be that the person that will make the whole of London a real garden city has not been BORN YET!

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Absolutely gutted to hear of decision by Lewisham council voting to destroy Old Tidemill Wildlife Garden (Deptford) a park I have used for over 5 years now and gained great enjoyment, learning, and friendship from. A true garden for the...

Show full comment

Absolutely gutted to hear of decision by Lewisham council voting to destroy Old Tidemill Wildlife Garden (Deptford) a park I have used for over 5 years now and gained great enjoyment, learning, and friendship from. A true garden for the community where desert like playing fields and concrete playgrounds reign. Even more surprised to see it was included in Sadiq's very own 'Greener city Fund' doc circulated this summer.

Would love to see this wild garden, included and championed as park of 'national park city' I think without it, we really don't stand much chance. Try saving some of the green we already have, rather than felling mature trees for immature development.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

8 million trees: LESS THAN 1 tree per member of the London population. Not very impressive. Trees are the lungs of the planet: we each have a set of lungs and we each need another set of lungs to help us combat the increasing toxicity of...

Show full comment

8 million trees: LESS THAN 1 tree per member of the London population. Not very impressive. Trees are the lungs of the planet: we each have a set of lungs and we each need another set of lungs to help us combat the increasing toxicity of London air. More trees please.
In Lambeth, in response to the increasing toxicity of London air, the Council is withdrawing funding from, and maintenance of, it's green spaces. So any London Environment Strategy will need to overcome the opposition of local politics to a sensible approach to London's environment.
Fortunately there are 10s of 1000s of ordinary London residents determined to maintain, and increase, London's green spaces through befriending parks, restoring front gardens, gardening clubs, community planting, planting orchards, school growing schemes. The Mayor's strategy should include a database of all these groups so that we can join up, forming 'rivers' of gardening across the capital.
And any such gardening organisation registered with the Mayor's Office should be given access to free compost & unwanted plants: Lambeth Council makes residents pay for compost their contractor makes from OUR recycled food waste. How mean is that??!!??

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I think more green cities better for everyone. It puzzles me that the mayor is for the green future and the Lewisham council just voted to demolish beautiful old garden Old Tidemill in Deptford. There is always a place for sensitive green...

Show full comment

I think more green cities better for everyone. It puzzles me that the mayor is for the green future and the Lewisham council just voted to demolish beautiful old garden Old Tidemill in Deptford. There is always a place for sensitive green redevelopment of the area but it has to be actually communicated with the people who live there not to ignore their and other greener proposals! Old Tidemill has 73 trees and it is an important green gem of the already heavily polluted area of Deptford. It’s a community pride and wonderful place to relax. How this can be stopped?!!! Help us to
save this green place now!

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Is Old Tidemill a public space donated by a benefactor for the perpetual use of the local community? You need to establish the legal status of the garden in order to save it. The Council has no legal right to demolish a public amenity that...

Show full comment

Is Old Tidemill a public space donated by a benefactor for the perpetual use of the local community? You need to establish the legal status of the garden in order to save it. The Council has no legal right to demolish a public amenity that has been granted to the populace in perpetuity. So find out the status of the garden & go from there. Even if it is the worst case scenario, and the garden is now 'owned' by the Council, there are separate laws about the felling of trees. Just as private residents may not fell trees willy-hilly, neither may Councils. Start an action group. Start a petition. Look at the Council's own strategy for maintaining/increasing green spaces in Deptford & challenge them if the demolition of this garden is in contravention of their current strategy. Complain to the DCLG that the Council is not meeting their statutory duty. Tweet. Blog. Facebook. Engage the local media. And why is the garden being demolished? Whatever the reason, find an alternative & make it attractive to the Council to adopt iso demolition.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Amur leopard

It would be lovely to have a highline project like New York and Paris as well. One that would be good for walking and relaxing.

All outdoor Tube stations could have green projects on their premises, platforms or buildings (maybe maintained...

Show full comment

It would be lovely to have a highline project like New York and Paris as well. One that would be good for walking and relaxing.

All outdoor Tube stations could have green projects on their premises, platforms or buildings (maybe maintained by volunteers, local schools and community projects?)

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

There is a project being developed in peckham, a walk along the old Coal line. Though I'm not sure how welcome alot of these green developments are welcomed by local neighbourhoods. It's essentially a corridor of wealth that does the same...

Show full comment

There is a project being developed in peckham, a walk along the old Coal line. Though I'm not sure how welcome alot of these green developments are welcomed by local neighbourhoods. It's essentially a corridor of wealth that does the same cleansing of nieghbourhoods as unwanted high street development etc.

More community gardens run by grassroots groups is what's needed.

Tube stations used to have competitions for station gardens, I wonder when this stopped.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Amur leopard

More waterways less concrete for drainage, aesthetics and attracting wildlife.

More green spaces in smaller concentrations. We have a lot of parks but we need more garden space where there is densely populated urban space.

More roof...

Show full comment

More waterways less concrete for drainage, aesthetics and attracting wildlife.

More green spaces in smaller concentrations. We have a lot of parks but we need more garden space where there is densely populated urban space.

More roof gardens and vertical gardens in new buildings. I get bored of seeing similar glass buildings going up without any architectural features and this would be a way to build interesting and useful high rises.

Well maintained water fountains in these green spaces and near bike docking stations. Free fresh water should be readily available throughout the UK and help cut plastic waste.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Lewisham Council want to demolish 73 trees at Tidemill Old Wildlife Garden in Deptford. They also have gifted a strip of land with several trees on it to a developer at a site nearby. The Council is ruining our environment! Both sites are...

Show full comment

Lewisham Council want to demolish 73 trees at Tidemill Old Wildlife Garden in Deptford. They also have gifted a strip of land with several trees on it to a developer at a site nearby. The Council is ruining our environment! Both sites are next to one of the most polluted roads in London (Deptford Church Street) where NO2 readings are 62 (the EU limit is 40).

What can be done to stop Lewisham Council?

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

All public spaces within 'National Park City' should be included in the classification, including so-called 'Privately Owned Public Spaces' (Pops), legacy categories of 'public space' including Royal Parks and the numerous local borough...

Show full comment

All public spaces within 'National Park City' should be included in the classification, including so-called 'Privately Owned Public Spaces' (Pops), legacy categories of 'public space' including Royal Parks and the numerous local borough 'green spaces'.

More broadly, the designation of National Park confers a consistent set of bylaws and rights on all public accessible land within the park boundary.

There are presently 15 National Parks in the UK and each one has its own authority, so the National Park City can have unique covenants, but it should fit rationally into the umbrella organisation 'National Parks UK'.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Staghorn coral

Stop penalising gardeners by charging them for garden waste. Too many gardens are being concreted over :-(

Avatar for -

Thank you for all your ideas and suggestions.

What do you see as the benefits of having good green infrastructure in the city?

Talk London

Avatar for -

I would say: a very effective way to improve overall mental health. Preventative work is essential to combat mental health problems. Traffic free zones, more playgrouds, parks, trees, less noise and pollution = happier, healthier children...

Show full comment

I would say: a very effective way to improve overall mental health. Preventative work is essential to combat mental health problems. Traffic free zones, more playgrouds, parks, trees, less noise and pollution = happier, healthier children, happier families, healthier communities.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Far too much plane noise in London. Disrupts sleep and ends conversations if outside. Heathrow should not be expanded.

Avatar for -

Perhaps better use could be made of the London Tree Map? If this map were to be made more comprehensive with more frequent surveys that are mandatory for all councils to undertake, incorporating this valuable public data into Mayoral policy...

Show full comment

Perhaps better use could be made of the London Tree Map? If this map were to be made more comprehensive with more frequent surveys that are mandatory for all councils to undertake, incorporating this valuable public data into Mayoral policy targets could richly enhance London's tree coverage and diversity by holding local councils to account.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I fervently support the Mayor's proposal to make London a National Park City. Thank you, Mayor! I wish it could be 99% green, not just 50%! Please let's cover every possible square inch with as much vegetation as we can. Trees and plants...

Show full comment

I fervently support the Mayor's proposal to make London a National Park City. Thank you, Mayor! I wish it could be 99% green, not just 50%! Please let's cover every possible square inch with as much vegetation as we can. Trees and plants are not only our planet's lungs, but they soak up local air pollution and noise pollution and are crucial for our mental health too. I hope that the planners can also consider the needs of London's wildlife, and try to plant the kinds of trees and bushes that will be best at providing them with natural food & shelter. This also applies to parks and green spaces -- PLEASE consider increasing and expanding protected 'refuge' areas of wild natural habitat (preferably linked by 'wild corridors', which are left undisturbed enough for a diverse range of wildlife to thrive in peace. Green islands of natural beauty and calm in the midst of the human chaos. The animals and birds have no choice but to share their living space with us, and however hard we think we have to struggle to survive in an urban environment, you can bet they are struggling much harder! If London's wildlife is well-catered-for, safe, peaceful and happy, the rest of us get the joy of watching them thriving in these calm spaces, which is good for our health too. A win-win scenario.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

More trees would be brilliant and more birds even better but the two are only linked if the right species mix is used. For example the planting in the consulation illustration photo shows tough drought resistant grasses that are useless to...

Show full comment

More trees would be brilliant and more birds even better but the two are only linked if the right species mix is used. For example the planting in the consulation illustration photo shows tough drought resistant grasses that are useless to wildlife in london. Most municipal planting is carried out by contractors minimising maintenance so that they can make a few quid more. Plane trees are londons most ubiquitous tree but near useless for wildlfe. Not much eats them (a couple of invertebrate as opposed to hundreds for oak or willow etc). Thickets are needed for songbirds to nest and hide from predators. Green gardens are needed to feed blackbirds ,thrushes,robins wrens, blackcaps which give us spring and summer song in citiies. Yet everyday a garden is paved over. My street had 16 singing blackbirds in 1992 -it now has two -all the front gardens and many rear are paved or gravled over. peopel need to be asked -what do you have against blackbirds and robins? parks don't fare particularly well in this regard either because they are generally not designed with ecosystems in mind.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

For the past two summers my wife and I have walked the Capital Ring and the London LOOP. These are both TfL ventures. Our only comment, other than the fact that they are a good idea, is that the waymarking and signs leave a lot to be...

Show full comment

For the past two summers my wife and I have walked the Capital Ring and the London LOOP. These are both TfL ventures. Our only comment, other than the fact that they are a good idea, is that the waymarking and signs leave a lot to be desired in places. This is mainly due to inconsistency from "no signs at all in key places" to " extra signs in places where they are unnecessary" like on a canal. Perhaps some money can be given to the local authorities to hire Trail Rangers (or even voluntary ones) to check the route and signs etc say monthly.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I am delighted that The Mayor has decided to support and promote the concept of London being a National Park City within his environmental vision for the city. At this time of general uncertainty it is really important that we can lead the...

Show full comment

I am delighted that The Mayor has decided to support and promote the concept of London being a National Park City within his environmental vision for the city. At this time of general uncertainty it is really important that we can lead the world in such conceptual thinking. Of course the economy is important, but the quality of life for those who live and work in this great city is important too. How good it is to have something positive to look forward to. Let's make it happen, let's make it happen soon and let's make the world know it is happening.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Congratulations on supporting the National Park City. But its only a start. If the mayor's office could stop councils constantly building on green spaces simply as a route to additional revenue generation so they can waste more money on...

Show full comment

Congratulations on supporting the National Park City. But its only a start. If the mayor's office could stop councils constantly building on green spaces simply as a route to additional revenue generation so they can waste more money on their pet projects it might help too.

My local authority has plans to allow a huge high-rise, 23-story block of flats in the centre of Walthamstow. Every small strip of space or "green" street corner is being built on. They have told us that it is necessary to increase revenues in the borough, Actually, it reminds me of the "Votes for Homes" scandal in the 1980s. Meanwhile, they waste a fortune on propaganda news papers, moving council offices, constant rebuilding of roads (because they keep getting it wrong). They cause traffic jams and pollution through "mini-hollands" and changing traffic light timings. They spend 10s of thousands on fundamentally unsafe shared-use junctions that cater for the young, fit and healthy but are a danger to the old, infirm and the blind or deaf. For a Labour council it is a disgrace. Over the whole borough that's millions of pounds. No wonder they need to increase revenue. One of the latest is to build a "visitor centre" on Walthamstow Wetlands (near the SSSI protected area) which will distub what's left of the wildlife. Now they have applied for liquor and dancing licences. And then they spend on faddy concerts and festivals that can be used to indoctrinate young people.

It's all very well developing a macro-plan when it suits the powers that be, and then running away when the problems become tough to deal with. At the moment, London does not have a sustainable strategy that is geared to protect and extend green areas because green areas do not contribute to local resources. Council depend on growth which means population growth. Until we grasp the nettle of how to control population growth in London (and at a national level) then our environment will be destroyed. Its a simple fact of mathmatics.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Monarch butterfly

Hear, Hear!

Show full comment

Hear, Hear!

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

We need more greener spaces in all developments and the Mayor should include a minimum level of green (not just open) space in planning guidance.

This is not just for trees, which are important, but also green social spaces where people...

Show full comment

We need more greener spaces in all developments and the Mayor should include a minimum level of green (not just open) space in planning guidance.

This is not just for trees, which are important, but also green social spaces where people including children can meet and play. These should be at ground level. In addition, roof level (open to all residents) should become mandatory for all towers above 5 stories; and substantial balconies should be compulsary for all flats, of a size and design that allows flat dwellers far from the ground to grow plants.

More space should be provided to grow food at ground level as well as on balconies. Estate plantings can include edibles - such as community orchards and 'flower' beds planted with fruit and vegetables. These can be at ground level or in containers.

It is also now possible and easy to build in vertical plantings up the side of buildings (such as at The Oval). These to should be encouraged.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Monarch butterfly

The current Mayor, Mr Khan, sadly is as much of a failure as his predecessor (Mr Johnson). Both are a failure for the latter supported only his obscure aspirations, and the former (current) only cares for business.

Avatar for -

I have joined the 'Save Southwark Woods'/'Fiends of camberwell cemeterys' campaign to try to prevent southwark council cutting down trees to make way for more buriel spaces. I believe that trees/woodland should take priority over buriel...

Show full comment

I have joined the 'Save Southwark Woods'/'Fiends of camberwell cemeterys' campaign to try to prevent southwark council cutting down trees to make way for more buriel spaces. I believe that trees/woodland should take priority over buriel spaces in London.

Show less of comment