-
Reference:
2008/1424
-
Question by:
John Biggs
-
Meeting date:
16 July 2008
In referring to your consent order of 13th May would it not have been clearer English to refer to this also as the reversal of the policy to charge a higher congestion charge for gas-guzzlers with high emissions? Should you not at the same time as making this order have issued an apology to those Londoners, particularly the young and old, with respiratory difficulties whose health is adversely affected by the emissions of these vehicles? Will you publish the advice you took in reaching this decision given that clearly it must have rebutted each of the reasons used by your...