Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Programmes to support people in custody (2)

  • Reference: 2017/4357
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
How many young people has the Metropolitan Police Service Divert scheme so far supported into employment, education, and training?

Programmes to support people in custody (1)

  • Reference: 2017/4356
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
The Metropolitan Police Service Divert scheme connects young people in police custody to employment, education, and training services that help young people find positive alternatives upon release. How will you ensure that programmes like this continue to be funded and expanded across London?

Knife crime prevention campaign (3)

  • Reference: 2017/4355
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Since our discussion at the Police and Crime committee on 20 September 2017, what further discussions have you had with the Home Office and what progress have you made about working in a more co-ordinated way on knife crime prevention campaigns and funding?

Knife crime prevention campaign (2)

  • Reference: 2017/4354
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Thank you for your response to my question 2017/3984. In a follow-up discussion at the Police and Crime committee on 20 September 2017 you told me that an anti-knife crime media campaign will soon be put out to tender. Could you provide details and the communications brief for this tender process?

Knife crime prevention campaign (1)

  • Reference: 2017/4353
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Your Knife Crime Strategy published in June 2017, stated that there will be a prevention campaign launched in London in autumn 2017 to dissuade young people from carrying knives. There is concern from community groups that campaigns of this kind can frighten young people and, perversely, encourage young people to see their city as a dangerous place where they need to be routinely armed. How will the upcoming campaign aim to counter negative narratives of young people in London?

Trident Matrix review (2)

  • Reference: 2017/4352
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
The appointment of the first London Victims' Commissioner is a positive step in representing victims' voices. The Lammy Review and community groups have raised concerns about the gathering and sharing of data in the Trident Matrix, for victims as well as perpetrators of crime, and the negative effect this has on racial disparity. How will the Trident Matrix review guarantee that victims of serious youth violence are not further penalised by being associated with youth crime?

Trident Matrix review (1)

  • Reference: 2017/4351
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Recommendation five of the Lammy Review advises consultation with voluntary and community sector groups on the review of the Trident Matrix, specifically to address racial disparity. When will this consultation take place, and how will you make a wide range of community and voluntary sector groups aware of it and encourage them to take part?

Lost property in London

  • Reference: 2017/4350
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Following the publication of the MOPAC Public Access and Engagement Strategy, and with reference to my response to that consultation, what is your advice to Londoners who lose valuable items outside the public transport system, or who find lost items and wish to return them to their owners?

Streatham police base

  • Reference: 2017/4349
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Could you confirm when the front counter service from Streatham police base will cease, whether it will continue as a base for ward police teams, and if so for how long?

Response to question during MOPAC consultation

  • Reference: 2017/4348
  • Question by: Siân Berry
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
During the consultation period for the MOPAC Public Access and Engagement Strategy I specifically requested in my question 2017/3620 an extension to the table of crime reports for each front counter in Annex 3 to include other reasons for visiting each front counter. Your answer did not provide this table but referred me to information in a pie chart already in the consultation document, which summarised overall findings from the survey conducted but did not give the other reasons for visiting each front counter. Could you answer this question as originally asked and provide the table requested?
Subscribe to