Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Tube noise

  • Reference: 2017/4554
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Do you consider TfL's response to complaints about tube noise to be adequate?

Mill Hill circus

  • Reference: 2017/4553
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Will you provide an update on progress towards improving Mill Hill Circus?

Stirling corner

  • Reference: 2017/4552
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Will you provide an update on progress towards improving pedestrian and cycle crossing facilities at Stirling Corner?

CS 11 [7]

  • Reference: 2017/4551
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Kilburn Older Voices Exchange (KOVE), are concerned about possible delays to buses in the area around Swiss Cottage due to the changes in traffic due to CS11: what reassurance can you give them?

CS 11 [6]

  • Reference: 2017/4550
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Kilburn Older Voices Exchange (KOVE), a community group for older people in the Kilburn, West Hampstead, Finchley Road and Swiss Cottage areas have raised their concerns as to what provision will be made under the CS11 changes at Swiss Cottage for pedestrians who need to cross the road, particularly at street level. Many older people find it difficult to use stairs, which precludes crossing the road through Swiss Cottage station. Of particular importance is what the crossing time allowed is where there is provision for people to cross the road. Some of their members say that cars hoot at them...

CS 11 [5]

  • Reference: 2017/4549
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Will you reconsider going ahead with the Swiss Cottage CS11 plan until TfL can confirm that they have a complete route agreed that is consistent with their consultation?

CS 11 [4]

  • Reference: 2017/4548
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
The overwhelming majority of the traffic and pollution displacement caused by CS11 is created by the reworking of Swiss Cottage. Its negative effects are going to be felt in all the neighbouring communities of Hampstead, Belsize Park, South Hampstead and St John's Wood. Is it acceptable that tens of thousands of local residents are asked to pay with damage to their health through pollution in residential streets that had previously been unaffected as quiet, "living" streets fill with displaced rat-running traffic for what is a cycle route to nowhere?

CS 11 [3]

  • Reference: 2017/4547
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Residents consider it to be bad governance and contrary to the spirit of the CS11 consultation, subsequent stakeholder engagement and the timetable TfL set out when they announced their decision. with TfL risking completing just the Swiss Cottage element, drawing in cyclists with the promise of a safe cycle route from Swiss Cottage to the West End while able only to deliver a tiny fraction of it. Is this neither good for the cyclists nor the surrounding communities?

CS 11 [2]

  • Reference: 2017/4546
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
TfL are starting their work on CS11 before they have Camden's agreement to contribute their stretch of Avenue Road as they still have not satisfied Camden's long-outstanding information requests, and before they have an agreement on the park gates and in the knowledge that Westminster have a moratorium on further cycle superhighways on their streets. Is this wise?

CS 11 [1]

  • Reference: 2017/4545
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 16 November 2017
Local residents are extremely concerned about TfL's seemingly incomplete and piecemeal implementation plans for the cycle superhighway, with TfL intending to start work this year on the Swiss Cottage section only. Swiss Cottage alone is not a cycle superhighway. It is part of what was consulted on but residents consider does not represent enough of what was consulted on to be a valid project in isolation. Is this wise?
Subscribe to