Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Stanmore Station: Step Free Access (1)

  • Reference: 2018/1838
  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
Thank you for your answer to Question 2018/1230. I strongly disagree that Stanmore Station does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the Transport for London (TfL) accessibility programme. This is not the view and experience of local residents, commuters, stakeholders such as Aspire, the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital and local resident associations. The former Deputy Mayor for Transport after her visit to the station agreed that the station was far from step-free. Your £200m accessibility fund is hugely welcomed but will you ask TfL to immediately reverse its position and include Stanmore station in the priority list of step-free...

Harrow-on-the-Hill Station: Step-free Access update

  • Reference: 2018/1837
  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
I am happy that Harrow-on-the-Hill station was one of the first stations you committed to making step-free access under your £200m step-free accessibility programme. Can I have an update on what work has been done so far?

Dame Judith Hackitt's Review - combustible materials (2)

  • Reference: 2018/1836
  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
The Government has announced they will now consult on the use of combustible cladding in England and have made a £400m commitment to remove combustible cladding. Will you be responding to the consultation?

Dame Judith Hackitt's Review - combustible materials (1)

  • Reference: 2018/1835
  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
Will you lobby Government for a temporary ban on the use of combustible materials on complex and high-rise buildings and until we have a regulatory and testing system which is fit for purpose?

Dame Judith Hackitt's Review (3)

  • Reference: 2018/1834
  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
Have you made recommendations to Government following Dame Judith Hackitt's review to ensure that new construction, refurbishment and ongoing management of buildings benefit from a robust and safe framework of regulations, site supervision and management by owners/applicants such as local authorities, housing associations and private sector?

Dame Judith Hackitt's Review (2)

  • Reference: 2018/1833
  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
I am concerned about desktop studies being used as an attempt to approve safety compliance. Will you lobby the Government against this, as this would provide the clarity for building owners and building industry who need to know what they can use to replace dangerous cladding and insulation and help keep buildings safer?

Dame Judith Hackitt's Review (1)

  • Reference: 2018/1832
  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
It's almost a month since 'The Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety' report was published. What is your overall view on the report and what action have you taken as Mayor to address the issues raised in her report?

Section 60 - Harrow

  • Reference: 2018/1831
  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
How many times has a Section 60 PACE order been issued by the Metropolitan Police Service in Harrow? Please provide a breakdown by the years 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015?

Section 60 - Brent

  • Reference: 2018/1830
  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
How many times has a Section 60 PACE order been issued by the Metropolitan Police Service in Brent? Please provide a breakdown by the years 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015?

Air quality in Hillingdon

  • Reference: 2018/1828
  • Question by: Onkar Sahota
  • Meeting date: 19 July 2018
With stats showing Hillingdon is one of the most polluted boroughs in London, how well does the Mayor believe the local council has been able to work with him to deliver a cleaner environment locally?
Subscribe to