• Reference: 2018/2569
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

How many 999 calls to the Metropolitan Police have been diverted to police control rooms outside of London in the last three months, broken down per month.

• Reference: 2018/2568
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

In response to Question No: 2018/2087 you said "It is not possible to break down the attached statistics by time as hourly interval reporting is only available on the system for the preceding 3 months". Please therefore provide the information requested for the preceding 3 months.

• Reference: 2018/2567
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

In relation to the case I previously mentioned in Question 2018/2096, you agreed that the offence warranted inclusion on the public tier of your Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker and told me it would appear shortly. It took over two months after the prosecution had taken place for the offence to appear on the public tier. Will you give a set timeframe under which local authorities have to upload case details, so as to improve the functionality of the checker?

• Reference: 2018/2566
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

Do Safer Schools Officers raise awareness of fraud and other financial crimes in schools? If not, will you encourage the roll-out of this?

• Reference: 2018/2565
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

Last year, in response to Question 2017/5015 you said that the Metropolitan Police Service's Operation Falcon was developing a strategy to support Local Authorities against cyber crime. You also said the work of the London Digital Security Centre may be extended to cover local authorities. Can you please provide an update on progress in these two areas?

• Reference: 2018/2564
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

Your Police and Crime Plan 2017-21 notes that you will "ensure that there is an adequate focus on small and micro businesses which often do not have the resources or expertise required to navigate the complex issues linked to business crime". What support have you given to Business Crime Reduction Partnerships to protect small and micro businesses from the scourge of business crime?

• Reference: 2018/2563
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

In response to Question No: 2018/2082 you said "Rarely, an SNB may become entirely inactive and where this is the case the SNB funding is retained by MOPAC and may be used to support the reinvigoration of the SNB or to deliver other engagement activities". Please can you confirm whether the £30,119 allocated from the Safer Neighbourhood Board to Westminster SNB for 2018/19 is to be retained by MOPAC, given that it hasn't met in over two years and is currently inactive?

• Reference: 2018/2562
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

Please can you provide a breakdown of what the £30,119 allocated in 2017/18 from the Safer Neighbourhood Board to Westminster SNB was spent on?

• Reference: 2018/2561
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

The Safer Neighbourhood Boards Guidance states: "There will also be financial accountability mechanisms in line with the disbursement of any public funds". Please provide detail of these mechanisms.

• Reference: 2018/2560
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 19 October 2018

In response to Question No: 2018/2081 you were unable to supply me with details of the last (i) meeting and (ii) public meeting of Lambeth, Newham or Westminster's Safer Neighbourhood Boards (SNBs) as these were 'to be confirmed'. Can you confirm that each SNB is appointed a single point of contact within MOPAC, who usually attends SNB meetings and is in contact with those administering the SNB. Subsequently, is it not disingenuous to suggest that MOPAC wouldn't be aware of when the last meetings took place?