• Reference: 2019/6073
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

During the period 09 November 2016 to 24 July 2018, were any concerns about conflicts of interest involving TfL executives ever shared by any TfL board member with the Audit and Assurance Committee?

• Reference: 2019/6072
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

Using Hampstead and Highgate as an example do you believe it was remiss that the consultation did not provide details on current flight paths, altitude and noise levels in decibels which meant it was impossible to compare with future alternatives? Do you agree that this does not meet the CAA’s earlier consultation requirement that “a clear statement of the current situation is given” as set out in CAA’s proposals for a revised airspace change process in 2016?

• Reference: 2019/6071
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

Do you agree that the recent Heathrow consultation was too complex for most residents to be able to understand and respond to and that deciding which flight path envelope to choose was almost impossible given the data provided in the consultation. Also at no point when responding to the consultation was it possible to register overall conclusions or to make simple points due to the constraints of the format. Is this acceptable and do you agree that this does not meet the CAA’s consultation requirement “stakeholders reading the consultation – including those with no technical expertise– can understand the potential...

• Reference: 2019/6070
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

Following the recent publication by Friends of the Earth of a map showing breaches of nitrogen dioxide pollution which revealed that Earl’s Court station had the highest recording across the country for this level of air pollution, what assurances can you provide local residents that all future housing developments in the area will include measures to mitigate the high levels of air pollution that the area is already facing?

• Reference: 2019/6069
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

Please provide an update of progress in producing a revised Earls Court masterplan?

• Reference: 2019/6068
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

Please state the specific timescale TfL will be following for implementation of the taxi tariff increase in 2019.

• Reference: 2019/6067
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

In answer to Question 2018/1726 you stated that you have asked TfL to look into the issue of drivers and riders being distracted by mobile devices, apps and sat navs. You further stated that workshops with key stakeholders, and from a number of industries, will be held to understand the use of electronic devices whilst driving and to explore solutions to the potential distraction these devices pose. Please set out what has been the outcome of these workshops and whether TfL will now consider additional research on this issue or licence conditions.

• Reference: 2019/6066
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

What steps are TfL taking to ensure there is a consistent approach across London for the public to be able to report abandoned bicycles?

• Reference: 2019/6065
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

What actions does TfL take to remove abandoned bicycles or other items locked to street furniture, including Sheffield stands, along the Transport for London road network?

• Reference: 2019/6064
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 21 March 2019

You have failed to answer my question submitted in November 2018 (Question number 2018/2987) requesting the number of employees who have applied for interest-free loans to assist with the up-front costs of childcare provision, as you announced on the 27 January 2017. When will you finally provide this information?