• Reference: 2020/0087
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

When will you respond to Question 2019/19758?

• Reference: 2020/0086
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

When will you respond to Question 2019/19756?

• Reference: 2020/0085
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

When will TfL provide me with the response you promised it would send to me in your 22 October Response to Question 2019/19757?

• Reference: 2020/0084
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

When will TfL provide me with the response you promised it would send to me in your 22 October Response to Question 2019/19749?

• Reference: 2020/0083
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

When will TfL provide me with the response you promised it would send to me in your 22 October Response to Question 2019/19750?

• Reference: 2020/0082
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

In your response to Question 2019/19759, you state that IA 17780 was classified as “Consultancy” and “No Conclusion” because that was the ‘correct classification’. If (a) a post-meeting note contained in the 26 June 2017 Minutes of the Safety, Sustainability and Human Resources Committee (http://content.tfl.gov.uk/sshrp-20170928-item03-minutes.pdf) clearly identifies the audit conclusion as “Requires Improvement” and (b) the first drafts of IA 17780 released in Question 2019/12001 clearly display “Audit Conclusion: Requires Improvement” on the Title Pages and (c) if, as you say “the evidence and recommendations were not changed”, how can “Consultancy/No Conclusion” possibly serve as the Audit and Assurance Committee’s...

• Reference: 2020/0079
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

Residency requirements for new police officer recruits were lifted temporarily at the end of 2018. What proportion of new officers who have been recruited since then would have met the requirement for London residency and what proportion would not? Could you provide the totals for each group during the period to date when the requirement was not in place, and the total number (from each group if any exceptions were made) recruited in the same time period prior to the lifting of the restrictions? Could you also give this data for each month since the lifting of the requirements and...

• Reference: 2020/0078
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

Residency requirements for new police officer recruits were lifted temporarily at the end of 2018, and this was due to be reviewed after six months. Has that review taken place, can you publish the results of any evaluation of its impacts, and are there any plans for London residency requirements to be reintroduced for the recruitment of new officers in future?

• Reference: 2020/0077
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

On 6 November 2019, the High Court concluded that the London-wide section 14 order imposed by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 14 October 2019 had been unlawful. What is the current estimate from the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) of the number of compensation claims it is preparing to receive, and what is the estimate of the cost of these compensation claims?

• Reference: 2020/0076
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

On 6 November 2019, the High Court concluded that the London-wide section 14 order imposed by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 14 October 2019 had been unlawful. Will all people arrested under the unlawful section 14 order receive apologies from the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)?