• Reference: 2019/20162
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

I am concerned that TfL contributed to the funding of rapid charging points for the car park serving the London Aquatics Centre and the Copper Box Arena yet access to these charging points is restricted to taxis and other users of electric vehicles due to car parking charges applying. Will you ensure that any further rapid charging points that TfL contributes to are fully accessible and not subject to car parking charges?

• Reference: 2019/20161
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

How many of the current rapid charging points that have been funded or part funded by TfL are currently in operation?

• Reference: 2019/20160
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

Please set out what actions are being taken to ensure rapid charging points reserved for electric taxis are being solely used by taxis?

• Reference: 2019/20159
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

TfL's 'file copy' of IA 13744 (Competence and Fitness of Tram Operations Limited (TOL) Tram Operators dated 2 July 2014) released in response to Question 2018/1314 was missing the report's final four pages (numbered 9-12). Please publish the version(s) of IA 13744 (and any related covering documentation) which TfL submitted to the Croydon Tram Crash Investigators (RAIB, SNC Lavalin), the British Transport Police and the Office of Rail and Road as part of their investigations into the Croydon Tram Crash.

• Reference: 2019/20158
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

The fatigue audit report IA 17780 states that Tram Operations Limited “carried out an audit of its Fatigues Risk Management System (FRMS) in May 2017”. Please provide a copy of that document.

• Reference: 2019/20157
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

Please publish a copy of AbsTracked Solutions audit mentioned in Section 4.0 (page 9) of IA 13744.

• Reference: 2019/20156
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

This report concluded with a ‘well controlled’ finding, despite the AbsTracked Solutions finding that Tram Operations Limited safety management was only ‘adequate’. Please explain the conflicting statements?

• Reference: 2019/20155
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

Point 4.0 (page 9) of the 2014 internal audit of TOL's Croydon Tram operation (IA 13 744), contains information that an outside audit by a company called "AbsTracked Solutions” found seven 'weaknesses' in TOL's safety management processes. AbsTracked Solutions audit conclusion on TOL's safety management system was 'adequate', not the higher classification of 'well controlled’ given by TfL’s Internal Audit IA 13744. Did TfL, during the course of fieldwork for IA 13 744 or at any point subsequently ask what those seven weaknesses identified by AbsTracked Solutions were? What actions, if any, did TfL undertake to ensure that Tram Operations...

• Reference: 2019/20154
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

Concerns have been expressed that some of Dial-a-Ride VW Bluebird buses have had their front ramp removed leading to uncertainty as to how wheelchair users could be safely evacuated if the bus was hit in the rear by another vehicle. What assurances can TfL provide to drivers and passengers that this issue has been properly assessed?

• Reference: 2019/20153
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 November 2019

Please publish a table showing how many current temporary employees at Transport for London have been engaged via employment agencies and paid through Personal Service Companies for (a) less than 3 months, (b) 3 to 6 months, (c) 6 to 12 months, (d) 12 to 18 months, (e) 18 months to 2 years, (f) 2 to 3 years, (g) 3 to 4 years, (h) 4 to 5 years, (i) 5 to 6 years, (j) 6 to 7 years, (k) over seven years. Please also break down the figures for each time period showing how many employees in each category were...