• Reference: 2025/2217
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

What data do you collect to assess collisions at locations and/or junctions without pedestrian crossings, where is it published, and do you use it to determine the locations for the installation of new pedestrian crossings?

• Reference: 2025/2216
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

A constituent has contacted me about the recent announcement of the appointment of new members to the board of Transport for London (TfL). They raised that while representation of all stakeholders including taxi drivers is important, there are no board members whose biography highlights a strong background in health and safety. They suggested that since Vision Zero is a key part of TfL’s agenda, this could be something of interest for the future. What is your response to this point, and will you consider appointing a board member who has experience in this area?

• Reference: 2025/2215
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Under the Affordable Homes Programme (AHP) 2021-26, how many homes funded to date have counted towards the 30 per cent acquisition cap? Could you provide data broken down by how many are: a) replacing (non-obsolete) demolished affordable homes, b) buying homes for use as affordable housing, and c) refurbishing supported housing?

• Reference: 2025/2214
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Your Rough Sleeping Plan of Action published last month sets a target to “replace the current practice of ‘verifying’ that someone is sleeping rough before they can access support, with an approach based on an assessment of people’s needs, by 2028.” I am pleased to see this action being taken, as this is an issue frequently raised by campaigners and charities as a key issue with current outreach services. Could you explain why it will take three years to change the existing approach?

• Reference: 2025/2213
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

The London Plan enshrines a Right to Return for social tenants housed on the regenerated estate. At what point in the planning and development process do residents typically express their desire to return to the regenerated estate?

• Reference: 2025/2212
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Could you confirm when can I expect to receive the data promised in your response to my oral MQ 2025/0239, from January 2025?

• Reference: 2025/2211
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Could you confirm when I can expect a full response to my MQ 2024/4025, which was promised ‘in the new year’?

• Reference: 2025/2210
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Where developers do not meet your affordable housing thresholds in a proposed development, they can use the viability testing route to reduce their affordable housing commitments. Typically there is a mismatch in resources and expertise between councils and developers, meaning developers’ determination of what is viable often cannot be effectively scrutinised by councils. How are you supporting councils to ensure they can secure the highest levels of affordable housing for their local residents?

• Reference: 2025/2209
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Given the London Plan consultation is still not publicly available in a full range of accessible formats, will you extend the consultation deadline to ensure the voices of Deaf and Disabled Londoners can still inform the next London Plan?

• Reference: 2025/2208
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 June 2025

In February, the Common Wealth thinktank published its report, Open for Business or Up for Sale? Institutional Investors in the UK Real Estate Market. What is your assessment of the risks of welcoming institutional investors into the London housing market, especially through products like Build to Rent?