Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Climate Change (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Can I just pursue this point, to agree with Jenny's point - the fuel poverty point - that by focusing on the affordable housing you get an added social benefit, but the Strategy focuses on the larger strategic developments. Isn't there a lot more that we can be doing given that I think the statistic is that 98% of all residential completions in the last year for which figures were available, were fewer than 100. By focusing on the larger ones we are missing the greater number. Are you satisfied that enough is going on to get the standards up...
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Before we move on to the next question I wonder if I could just ask you this: you have referred, Neale and David, to the relatively short time period covered by the Strategy. Leaving aside issues of the outcomes of elections and so on, what is anticipated in terms of roll forward of the Strategy, revision after it has been adopted and when a new one would come, or a revised one would come, onto the stocks to take us beyond 2011?
  • Transport Safer Neighbourhood Teams (2) (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    I take the point, wholly, that the train operating companies should be paying for their policing. Historically they do not. I do not think the public is going to be much impressed by this turf war.
  • Complexity of Police Panels and Committees (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    I wholly agree that this is best served to get sorted out pragmatically and at borough level, but can I suggest that it might be helpful, if it is not already happening, for the MPA to take the lead in discussion with what used to be the ALG, London Councils, as I think it is now, to try and start some thinking about how to rationalise what is becoming an increasingly complex consultative structure with often the same people going to lots of meetings saying exactly the same thing.
  • Detection rates targets

    • Reference: 2005/0142-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    What impact is pressure to meet detection rates targets having on policing priorities?
  • Stop and search

    • Reference: 2005/0144-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    Do you think Londoners of the Muslim faith should expect to be stopped and searched more often than other Londoners?
  • Technology

    • Reference: 2005/0147-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    Do you believe that more use of advanced technology could be made to reduce bureaucracy and free-up officer time?
  • Crime prevention

    • Reference: 2005/0148-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    What role is there for the Met in preventing crime in the first place?
  • Service Review

    • Reference: 2005/0150-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    What benefits do you expect the Service Review to deliver, in particular with respect to frontline policing, and how soon do you expect Londoners to be able to see them?
  • Violent crime

    • Reference: 2005/0152-1
    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 15 June 2005
    While explaining why recent recorded violent crime crime statistics are unreliable, the report Trends in Violent Crime since 1999/2000 concludes that violent crime in London has increased since 2003 - do you accept this conclusion?