Reducing emissions from transport
Closed
1495 Londoners have responded | 24/02/2022 - 27/03/2022

In 2019, air pollution contributed to the premature deaths of more than 4,000 Londoners. Last year, we saw the impact of the climate emergency first-hand with soaring temperatures and flash floods in the capital.
Did you know that since the start of the pandemic, more Londoners are using cars and fewer are using public transport? The cost of congestion rose to over £5 billion last year and the cost of air pollution to the NHS and care system until 2050 is estimated to be more than £10 billion. More people driving means more congested roads and more pollution.
Transport for London (TfL) has been assessing a number of approaches to encourage Londoners and those who drive within London to shift from polluting cars to electric vehicles, public transport and active travel – such as walking and cycling. This is in order to address the triple challenges of toxic air pollution, the climate emergency and congestion.
Given the urgency of the climate crisis and the damaging impact of toxic air pollution, the Mayor believes it’s time to speed up action. That’s why he has asked TfL to consult on proposals to extend the Ultra Low Emission Zone beyond the North and South Circular roads to cover almost all of Greater London. The extension will use the current emission standards to tackle more of the dirtiest vehicles.
We will let you know when this consultation launches. In the meantime, we’re keen to understand how we can all do more to reduce air pollution from transport.
More than a third of car trips in London could be made in under 25 minutes by walking, and two-thirds could be cycled in less than 20 minutes. Read more about the challenges and impact of air pollution caused by vehicles.
Join the discussion and tell us:- How can we do more to tackle transport emissions?
- Have you already made changes to the way you travel around London? Will you be making some in the future?
- In 2019, Transport for London introduced a scrappage scheme to help low-income and disabled Londoners, as well as small businesses and charities, ditch their older, more polluting vehicles and switch to cleaner models, ahead of the Ultra Low Emission Zone. Did you use the scheme when it was open? How did the scrappage payment help you prepare for ULEZ?
The discussion ran from 04 March 2022 - 27 March 2022
Closed
Want to join our next discussion?
New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.
Join Talk LondonAlready have an account?
Log into your accountPRL
Community Member 3 years agoHow do we know how much air pollution needs to be reduced when we do not seem to be measuring it and at least sharing that information? Perfectly clean isn't possible. What is the acceptable level in terms of public health.? And what is...
Show full commentHow do we know how much air pollution needs to be reduced when we do not seem to be measuring it and at least sharing that information? Perfectly clean isn't possible. What is the acceptable level in terms of public health.? And what is the benefit of any particular action? And how much will it cost? Clearly reducing emissions on buses, cabs and lorries was an obvious step forward. At the moment the taxes on residents and visitors seem more about tax collection at the expense of residents, the shops and the hospitality industry.
Show less of commentlarryboy
Community Member 3 years agoIf cyclists can be part of ordinary traffic due to the Highway Code why not get rid of cycle lanes because some cyclists won’t use them because apparently they are dirty
Show full commentIf cyclists can be part of ordinary traffic due to the Highway Code why not get rid of cycle lanes because some cyclists won’t use them because apparently they are dirty
Show less of commentpoffuomo
Community Member 3 years agoWhat's this got to do with the topic?
Cotterpin
Community Member 3 years agoCyclists can share roads with motor vehicles but are much safer when they do not have to. All the cyclists I know use cycle lanes wherever they are available. I have never heard anyone claim that cycle lanes are dirty.
Show full commentCyclists can share roads with motor vehicles but are much safer when they do not have to. All the cyclists I know use cycle lanes wherever they are available. I have never heard anyone claim that cycle lanes are dirty.
Show less of commentCaptain Fourbars
Community Member 3 years ago• Stop the ridiculous traffic schemes like devoting priceless space on London's narrow streets to cyclists. A politically motivated, crackpot scheme that ends up causing more problems than it could ever solve. Failing to recognise that...
Show full comment• Stop the ridiculous traffic schemes like devoting priceless space on London's narrow streets to cyclists. A politically motivated, crackpot scheme that ends up causing more problems than it could ever solve. Failing to recognise that people right across the social spectrum want convenience and comfort now, is the big mistake of certain politicians.
• Stop devoting priceless space on London's narrow streets to Bus Lanes that are not needed, eg off peak or when there are few buses needing them.
• Stop traffic schemes like Speed humps that INCREASE pollution and cause damage to cars and even injuries to passengers/patients.
• Stop 'scrappage' schemes which only encourage more car production (itself a polluter) with the curse of built-in obsolescence - Ditto the ULEZ and other such zones for similar reasons.
• Stop charging to use station carparks and build more - with multi-storeys if necessary. The production of a valid travel ticket or pass should replace payment. Making public transport inviting is the ONLY way to get people out of cars and on to buses and trains. People won't be forced any more. Use the carrot, not the stick and it works!
• Reduce the insane cost of TfL travel within London. London residents and London Council Tax payers should get free travel or at worst, heavily discounted travel. (Not so outrageous as it sounds - if you're serious about cutting pollution and not simply using it as an excuse to tax by stealth.)
• Perhaps most contravertially of all, stop adding new housing in London. The city is, simply put, full, if not to say overcrowded. That actually lies at the root of these and several other problems. Too many people in too little and FINITE space.
Nothing we do in several lifetimes will damage air quality as much as the massive daily destruction of rainforests and loss of greenery - the latter being within this very city. (Thank The Good Lord for for the Green Belt or London would be like Mexico City by now!)
Show less of commentCotterpin
Community Member 3 years agoThis discussion is about getting London to carbon neutral by 2030. I don't think any of these suggestions would take us closer to that goal.
Show full commentThis discussion is about getting London to carbon neutral by 2030. I don't think any of these suggestions would take us closer to that goal.
Show less of commentCaptain Fourbars
Community Member 3 years agoCotterpin: I respectfully disagree. On the contrary, pollution (and pumping out carbon) is heavily increased with congestion on the roads and reduced when people use cleaner versions of pubic transport, especially rail - the most energy...
Show full commentCotterpin: I respectfully disagree. On the contrary, pollution (and pumping out carbon) is heavily increased with congestion on the roads and reduced when people use cleaner versions of pubic transport, especially rail - the most energy-efficient method of moving weight on land that exists. Overcrowding and inefficient use of roads all play a huge part in that and anyway, being carbon neutral by 2030 is probably a pipe dream. By 2030 all the above problems will be infinitely worse.
Show less of commentlarryboy
Community Member 3 years agoI believe that pollution is caused by transport being backed up due to less road space taken up by cycle lanes and bus lanes and traffic unable to use them at off peak hours that we keep traffic moving less idling cars and lorries and less...
Show full commentI believe that pollution is caused by transport being backed up due to less road space taken up by cycle lanes and bus lanes and traffic unable to use them at off peak hours that we keep traffic moving less idling cars and lorries and less polluting because no one can get anywhere
Show less of commentpoffuomo
Community Member 3 years agoYour belief has been proved incorrect several times.
Cotterpin
Community Member 3 years agoCycles are traffic too, and cyclists are safer when they do not have to share road space with motor vehicles. Idling cars and traffic jams are polluting, but they are a sign that there are too many cars on the roads, not too many bicycles.
Show full commentCycles are traffic too, and cyclists are safer when they do not have to share road space with motor vehicles. Idling cars and traffic jams are polluting, but they are a sign that there are too many cars on the roads, not too many bicycles.
Show less of commentds12
Community Member 3 years agoGiven the number of them now, I think we should make it a legal requirement that all delivery, taxis, buses and non-emergency vehicles used by local government and emergency services are electric.
We should look at carrying Freight on TfL...
Show full commentGiven the number of them now, I think we should make it a legal requirement that all delivery, taxis, buses and non-emergency vehicles used by local government and emergency services are electric.
We should look at carrying Freight on TfL services in a hub and spoke model.
We should look at building Trams on roads with the most buses.
We should also allow minicabs with passengers to use Bus lanes.
Show less of commentbg
Community Member 3 years agoTax the taxis that aren’t electric. Tax the vans and lorries more. Reduce the over spend of bs schemes by TfL (all the corporate cr*p) and reinvest it in actually running the transport network.
Show full commentTax the taxis that aren’t electric. Tax the vans and lorries more. Reduce the over spend of bs schemes by TfL (all the corporate cr*p) and reinvest it in actually running the transport network.
Show less of commentstorm138
Community Member 3 years agoI support the use of public transport. Stand on Brixton Hill and you will see a queue of public TfL buses driving up or down the hill. Most of the buses appear to run on old Diesel engines with plumes of smoke (pollution) leaving their...
Show full commentI support the use of public transport. Stand on Brixton Hill and you will see a queue of public TfL buses driving up or down the hill. Most of the buses appear to run on old Diesel engines with plumes of smoke (pollution) leaving their engines. TfL need to do more to migrate these buses to electric, or better still consider more European style trams (Oslo/Lyon) that can reduced the physical number of buses using the same road. Why not join up the various bus routes into one or two trams routes. Based on the information I can find online there appears to be about 28 Eight buses that pass through Brixton Town centre. Surely these could be merged into a few tram routes that allows to transfer to other bus routes further along the route. This would then reduce both the pollution and the number of vehicles on the road system. This model could be consider in other parts of London. The European trams appear to be slightly narrower than the London buses which would allow bus lanes and other vehicles / cyclists to share more road space.
Show less of commentWe also need to see more vehicle charging points on neighbourhoods. There aren't any in my localised area of Brixton. This will help encourage more electric vehicles.
We need to see more secure bicycle locking facilities. We need to see more action by the Met Police to ensure bicycle theft is dealt with, bicycles in my neighbourhood are stolen, almost, daily. (Again, learn from other European cities).
It is important that TfL understand that a number of 'A' roads in and out of London have had their speed limits reduced to 20mph. Journey times are getting longer to get in and out. 'A' roads need to be protected routes for fast entry and exit from London and are part of the UK Strategic Road Network. The A23, for example, is a major road linking central London to Brighton. Clearly running through built up areas is a challenge, but consideration needs to be made at how these major road links can remain exactly that.
louispilfold
Community Member 3 years agoCycling needs to be safer, and cyclists should be the primary intended user for many more roads in London. Roads are designed for cars and I often feel in danger when cycling due to unsafe drivers and road design.
poffuomo
Community Member 3 years agoAbsolutely agree.
Cotterpin
Community Member 3 years agoI agree. We have made a lot of progress in redesigning London's roads to be safe for cyclists but there is still a lot to be done.
Show full commentI agree. We have made a lot of progress in redesigning London's roads to be safe for cyclists but there is still a lot to be done.
Show less of commentMM
Community Member 3 years agoTax the lorries and vans coming in to London more. Lorries and vans are congesting our streets and are contributing a great deal to air pollution.
Arnold Ridout
Community Member 3 years agoMore Low Traffic Neighbourhoods with cycle lanes on through routes.
Show full commentMore Low Traffic Neighbourhoods with cycle lanes on through routes.
Show less of commentPRL
Community Member 3 years agoMore thought needed on cycle lanes, many of which are barely used but cause significant high emission congestion
poffuomo
Community Member 3 years agoThis would be absolutely needed, thanks.
Glasme
Community Member 3 years agoAnother pretty biased survey in terms of the questions asked. I would use public transport more if it went to where I wanted to get to. I would walk further if the places I needed (shops, leisure clubs etc) were more local or if public...
Show full commentAnother pretty biased survey in terms of the questions asked. I would use public transport more if it went to where I wanted to get to. I would walk further if the places I needed (shops, leisure clubs etc) were more local or if public transport went there. Locality and public transport issues need to be solved to make it easier for people. Hammering car drivers who have no alternative is not the solution.
Show less of commentviahaalshah10
Community Member 3 years agoI would absolutely object to the congestion/ULEZ charge unless there is a proportional increase in connectivity in using public transport and reduction in the extortionate cost of public transport. There is no serious travel options to go...
Show full commentI would absolutely object to the congestion/ULEZ charge unless there is a proportional increase in connectivity in using public transport and reduction in the extortionate cost of public transport. There is no serious travel options to go around M25 on public transport without visiting central London or spending hours on unreliable bus services. There is a lot of talk about electric cars, but no action on putting charging points or increasing electric capacity on the grid. Further, as we are finding out - 50% of electricity is apparently generated using LNG (some of it from Russia). We can all go electric, provided 100% of the electricity is from renewable sources. Until then, we are only shifting the pollution problem from London to elsewhere in the countryside.
Also as we have seen public transport strikes. Without cars, what did the London Mayor/TFL provide to Londoners to get to work, or get about other than to say to WFH. Without a reliable and affordable public transport, the Mayors plans are out of touch with reality and the challenges faced by Londoners.
Show less of commenttjdanning
Community Member 3 years agoIts imperative that we take STRONG STRATEGIC FAST ACTION now to reduce the horrific air pollution that is linked to 40,000 deaths a year in the UK and is hugely contributing to climate change. Our health must come first, we urgently need...
Show full commentIts imperative that we take STRONG STRATEGIC FAST ACTION now to reduce the horrific air pollution that is linked to 40,000 deaths a year in the UK and is hugely contributing to climate change. Our health must come first, we urgently need huge reforms in how we get about and cars should be left for those unable to use active travel for short journeys, or those who dont have access to public transport. Most people in London are fortunate to experience a very high quality of frequent and reliable public transport. I fully support all measures to stop people using their cars. This includes scraping the highly damaging silvertown tunnel which will enable more air pollution not less.
Show less of commentMurray4
Community Member 3 years agoThat's a gross exaggeration. At the very worst it's a matter of a few weeks off of the end of your life. The truth is that the air has been getting cleaner, as well as motor vehicles. Life expectancy is going up too. This is all about the...
Show full commentThat's a gross exaggeration. At the very worst it's a matter of a few weeks off of the end of your life. The truth is that the air has been getting cleaner, as well as motor vehicles. Life expectancy is going up too. This is all about the car haters and the cycle lovers and a Mayor who needs money.
Show less of comment\
KTLondon
Community Member 3 years agoNewham Council and The Mayor of London are doing nothing more than 'box-ticking. Unfortunately, they are ticking the wrong boxes. I live directly in front of Royal Victoria Square, E16. This used to be a quiet pocket park where the dock...
Show full commentNewham Council and The Mayor of London are doing nothing more than 'box-ticking. Unfortunately, they are ticking the wrong boxes. I live directly in front of Royal Victoria Square, E16. This used to be a quiet pocket park where the dock edge was designated for use by pedestrians and cyclists. Newham has repeatedly ignored evidence from local residents that the Sunborn Yacht now uses it 24/7 as their own personal service yard. At the Strategic Development Committee Meeting on the 4th February 2021, they 'approved' an application for permanent mooring, despite the local residents sending in a detailed 30-page document detailing the lies and misinformation included in the Sunborn planning application. 13-months later the same application is still sitting 'Awaiting decision' while local residents suffer. When asked to explain, the response provided by LBN was that "it was not in the public interest to know why planning was given in a situation where it would not ordinarily be given".
We have sent details to some newspapers asking them to investigate but were told this subject would only be of interest once the Mayor's office moves down to the dock. It does appear that all of these surveys asking for residents' views are nothing more than a pretense to care. Planning applications are based on the premise that the applicant tells the truth. However, there is no penalty for lying so applicants with money can buy misleading reports. Planning officers turn a blind eye. The whole system is wide open to corruption. Local residents pay the price. Their voices are drowned out.
The entire debacle was recorded and uploaded to YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzSak-GSPQY
Show less of commentThe evidence shows the applicant clearly lying. The planners were clearly biased towards the applicant. There has been no investigation into errors made. It's farcical. Brown envelopes rule. Prioritizing cycling and walking is clearly way down the list of priorities for Newham and The Mayor's office.
chbagr
Community Member 3 years agoAir pollution is the biggest problem in London, you can easily feel the polluted air burning your lungs. The boats on the canal should be banned from burning coal. It’s ridiculous to use coal in zone 1-2 London 2022. Also, Londoners shouldn...
Show full commentAir pollution is the biggest problem in London, you can easily feel the polluted air burning your lungs. The boats on the canal should be banned from burning coal. It’s ridiculous to use coal in zone 1-2 London 2022. Also, Londoners shouldn’t be sacrificing more to reach zero emission, it’s on the big cooperations, factories, not us living a normal life. Mayor should understand that.
Show less of commenttheid
Community Member 3 years ago34% of particle emission is due to construction compared to 27% from ALL road transport, and this does not include the emissions generated by the construction supply train (i.e. vehicles and plant). Ambient air pollution is not an issue...
Show full comment34% of particle emission is due to construction compared to 27% from ALL road transport, and this does not include the emissions generated by the construction supply train (i.e. vehicles and plant). Ambient air pollution is not an issue currently regulated by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), making it difficult for construction companies to know what measures, if any, they ought to put in place to mitigate the risk posed to the public and employees by air pollution. But then that would mean querying the mammoth number of enormous construction projects in our cities - and who wants to do that?
Show less of commentMabe
Community Member 3 years agoWhy is the Mayor so set on the Silvertown Tunnel which in every respect will not help reduce pollution or carbon footprint
PRL
Community Member 3 years agoAny thing that reduces congestion reduces emissions
poffuomo
Community Member 3 years agoCompletely agree, the whole project should be cancelled and replaced by similar pedestrian/cycle river crossings
MadMark
Community Member 3 years agoLive within 50 metres of the green belt and 99% of my mileage is into Surrey. Would object to paying £12.50 for 100m of travel in London.
Julian Richards
Community Member 3 years agoThen park your car over the border! Hard cases make bad law, as they say.
tjdanning
Community Member 3 years agoperhaps a pay per mile structure is more effective in these outer areas? I hear your objection. But lets talk solutions and compromise :)
Show full commentperhaps a pay per mile structure is more effective in these outer areas? I hear your objection. But lets talk solutions and compromise :)
Show less of commentGeoffC
Community Member 3 years agoWhy are we even procrastinating. Charge large vehicles even more for parking/road use/ulez/congestion unless they are zero emission. Hybrids sonewhere in-between but closer to nonzhybrids than zero emission. Just start now. Tomorrow is...
Show full commentWhy are we even procrastinating. Charge large vehicles even more for parking/road use/ulez/congestion unless they are zero emission. Hybrids sonewhere in-between but closer to nonzhybrids than zero emission. Just start now. Tomorrow is already 1 day too late for air quality.
Show less of commentVeronicacham
Community Member 3 years agoCancel the Silvertown Tunnel. It's ridiculous to push more traffic into deprived areas and encourage more cars and lorries. What is the Mayor thinking? Build a bridge for walking, cycling and public transport instead and enable more...
Show full commentCancel the Silvertown Tunnel. It's ridiculous to push more traffic into deprived areas and encourage more cars and lorries. What is the Mayor thinking? Build a bridge for walking, cycling and public transport instead and enable more Londoners to travel safely, comfortably and sustainably. Build more protected space for all types of cycle, including those adapted for people with disabilities. Create parking standards for all types of cycle, so that local authorities require local shopping centres and other businesses, employers, places of study etc to make themselves cycle-friendly. Make cargo bikes easier to access and provide secure storage for all types of cycle. Ensure that housing standards all over London require cycle parking rather than car parking spaces for new developments. I have made a conscious effort to use the car less frequently and walk and cycle more for short journeys. We are thinking of not replacing it when it wears out, but joining a car club instead. Please create more parking spaces dedicated to car clubs and make all other parking spaces payable. We should not be subsidising free car storage on our roads. I did not use the scrappage scheme as there is a high carbon footprint to buying any new car. Our car is not ULEZ-compliant, but it is better environmentally to use it less and make it last as long as possible. Do not be seduced by the idea of electric cars. The only way they are better is at the exhaust. They cost carbon emissions to manufacture, and electricity still has to be generated. They do not tackle any of the other problems associated with car use such as obesity, diabetes, congestion, road danger or the waste of public space per person-mile.
Show less of commentgrer
Community Member 3 years agoRidiculous of the Mayor to think people can walk to take public transport more. We need cars to get around to places where it is not suitable to get on public transport. We have children to take to activities and many more reason to take a...
Show full commentRidiculous of the Mayor to think people can walk to take public transport more. We need cars to get around to places where it is not suitable to get on public transport. We have children to take to activities and many more reason to take a car. By restricting access to areas and creating there cycle lanes and other barriers is causing this congestion on the roads. Roads must be made better, more underpasses or tunnels would solve a lot of the issues but there is no investment in this. The Mayor needs to change priorities or get out.
Show less of commentJulian Richards
Community Member 3 years agoI agree that public transport isn't adequate, but the answer isn't to make driving easier! It's to provide better public transport.
Show full commentI agree that public transport isn't adequate, but the answer isn't to make driving easier! It's to provide better public transport.
Show less of commentGeoffC
Community Member 3 years agoUnfortunately cars cause many problems: congestion, bad parking, road deaths, overwhelming routes, noise pollution, air pollution, wasted resource, global warming, dependence on other countries for resource (oil, share parts, oroginal...
Show full commentUnfortunately cars cause many problems: congestion, bad parking, road deaths, overwhelming routes, noise pollution, air pollution, wasted resource, global warming, dependence on other countries for resource (oil, share parts, oroginal vehicle). Very much time to move away from this failed model.
Show less of comment