Brexit and moving London forward
London voted to stay in the European Union, but the country voted to leave. The coming months will bring the start of negotiations that will steer its way forwards through a ‘Brexit’ process and beyond.
Membership of the European Union meant access to the single market - meaning no trade restrictions or tariffs and free movement of services, goods and people between the UK and member countries. What follows could therefore shape future trade, establishment, investment and possibly civic life in general in the capital.
What do you think are the key issues for the capital through this negotiation process and beyond? What are the conditions needed for London to move forward with the UK no longer part of the European Union? How can we unite to build towards a strong future for the capital?
The discussion ran from 28 June 2016 - 28 September 2016
Closed
Want to join our next discussion?
New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.
Join Talk LondonAlready have an account?
Log into your accountAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoOne urgent task is to stamp out hate crimes of all kinds.
E17 Pioneer
Community Member 9 years agoCompletely agree. A 12 year old boy was told to '**** off' by two adult men yesterday as he walked up the tube stairs in Walthamstow. My friend was there to defend him, but where are we if 12 year old boys can't walk home from school...
Show full commentCompletely agree. A 12 year old boy was told to '**** off' by two adult men yesterday as he walked up the tube stairs in Walthamstow. My friend was there to defend him, but where are we if 12 year old boys can't walk home from school without being abused?
Show less of commentSo many other micro-aggressions are being reported. The far right have become far more entitled since the Brexit vote.
Natasa
Community Member 9 years agoWhether we would stay in or out it was tricky as both results would have positive and negative consequences. As the leave prevailed we have to make the best of it. One good thing is that both, Uk government and people and EU people and...
Show full commentWhether we would stay in or out it was tricky as both results would have positive and negative consequences. As the leave prevailed we have to make the best of it. One good thing is that both, Uk government and people and EU people and governments, as well as EU commissions, have to think very hard how to improve things for everybody as it showed they didn't get it right and got a bit too laid back and out of touch. The worst thing that might happen and looks that when we leave EU will try to take the financial passport away which is UK's strongest card and it would mean bad news for the whole of UK. That is why we need some tough negotiators who can get Uk a good deal. However we can't only count on that but we should strengthen and promote our other strong points like tourism and higher education which both attract people to Uk and bring the money to our ecconomy. We should also support small businesses which have greatly disappeared in London, not just here but throughout the UK to make people more independent. We have a high dependency on foreign agriculture so maybe promote massive greenhouses in the country to be able to feed the country and create jobs. London's infrastructure is already suffering so promote business out of London to distribute people more evenly through the country and make the country strong. Perhaps start with green technologies like building hybrid and electric cars, solar panels, wind turbines to reduce the need for foreign oil. Start talks with other interested parties like Canada and Taiwan about new trades. We need to be prepared for the worst if EU decides to punish us and we can't leave til it the last minute so we have strong negotiating position. Yes, the Mayor should be part of the new EU unit.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoThere are two points I would like to make. Prior to entering an agreement to work with the economic community, Britain or UK, whichever you prefer, was completely self sufficient in all agricultural produce. Gradually more and more rules...
Show full commentThere are two points I would like to make. Prior to entering an agreement to work with the economic community, Britain or UK, whichever you prefer, was completely self sufficient in all agricultural produce. Gradually more and more rules were put in place by the EC or EU, until it was not viable for our farmers to continue, and foreign imports took over. This was good for the imports such as pineapples and other items not produced here, but not for British farmers.
Show less of commentAs most people would know, lots of manufacturers of many diverse products, have closed their factories, causing great unemployment, and have set up in Europe. Who do you think provided the money for this to happen? The EU did. Supposedly our "friends", working 'with' us. I don't know about you, but I don't want anything to do with that type of group.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoSelf-sufficiency is a complete myth. You only have to look at the crippling effects of U-boat warfare in both world wars to chuck that one out of the window.
Show full commentSelf-sufficiency is a complete myth. You only have to look at the crippling effects of U-boat warfare in both world wars to chuck that one out of the window.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoI wasn't able to vote due to unexpectedly having to travel. My stay vote wouldn't have made any difference, but I wonder how many others chose or were unable to vote who would have also voted to stay. For such an important change to the...
Show full commentI wasn't able to vote due to unexpectedly having to travel. My stay vote wouldn't have made any difference, but I wonder how many others chose or were unable to vote who would have also voted to stay. For such an important change to the whole fabric of the country it should have required achieving more than 50% of the available votes rather than just those who actually voted.
I believe that London needs to think and act in the best interests of the whole country. The success of the leave vote shows what will happen when there is a perception of inequality or lack of representation. We need to take this opportunity to work together to ensure that the country as a whole is able to move forward in ways that benefit all areas of the community. It's difficult to make any specific comments on issues as there is no clear indication of what things will actually change and how each of those will cascade in effect to other areas.
Show less of commentlivehere
Community Member 9 years agoClear and detailed indications of how things would change should have been put before the electorate well before the start of the EU referendum campaigns. As I understand it, most other countries that use referenda do require more than 50%...
Show full commentClear and detailed indications of how things would change should have been put before the electorate well before the start of the EU referendum campaigns. As I understand it, most other countries that use referenda do require more than 50% - more like 65% or 70% - for a decision. Mature, sensible, countries. And I suspect that the populations of those countries are a lot better educated and knowledgeable about their countries' economies, politics, etc.
Show less of commentOne entirely predictable result of the outcome is that the far right are moving into control in the government, so don't expect any moving forward together for the whole country. The reason so many people feel alienated and disaffected is that the country voted for the Tories, who do not believe in supporting the regions, or the disabled, or the NHS, or in using tariffs to protect UK industries from product-dumping by other countries. Now the government is even more right-wing, so even if there is a little period of soothing the north etc, it won't last long. The right have been handed on a plate all the excuses they ever needed to finally kill-off the NHS and the remaining welfare state. Well done the Brexiters. If they had got more involved with politics in the UK and in the EU years ago we would not be in this position at all. Now London is going to have suffer along with the rest of the UK, at least for the next few years.
sharon50
Community Member 9 years agoLondon is part of the UK & the UK voted to leave the EU. I hope the mayor of london will support the democratic result & do everything in his power to work towards an exit that works for the UK & London. Just because the minority didn't...
Show full commentLondon is part of the UK & the UK voted to leave the EU. I hope the mayor of london will support the democratic result & do everything in his power to work towards an exit that works for the UK & London. Just because the minority didn't get their way does not give anyone the right to override the decision of the majority of the UK.
Show less of commentjlynton
Community Member 9 years ago63% of eligible voters did NOT vote to leave, how could you consider that to be a minority?
sharon50
Community Member 9 years agoWhat are you talking about. Leave won the referendum with a majority.
yourstr
Community Member 9 years agoI fully support Mayor Khan in London having a seat at the negotiating table. For me there are no good or bad decisions just consequences. The consequences for the rest of Europe 'losing' London are major in their effect and vice versa. Let...
Show full commentI fully support Mayor Khan in London having a seat at the negotiating table. For me there are no good or bad decisions just consequences. The consequences for the rest of Europe 'losing' London are major in their effect and vice versa. Let us then have mature adult conversations about the future. And not the threat inducing negative dialogue that evokes the child in us, that we've had up to now. If the campaigns had been run in a mature adult way without 'I must win' running in campaigners' heads evoking all the lies and mud-slinging, my view is,the country would have looked at the evidence in a balanced way and voted to stay. The brain does like dualistic binary thinking, until it learns, to be comfortable with paradox and uncertainty
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoBritain did not vote to leave the EU rather that "37% of British electorate advise government through a legally non binding vote of their desire to leave Europe". Also after realising the consequences of their actions there appear to be...
Show full commentBritain did not vote to leave the EU rather that "37% of British electorate advise government through a legally non binding vote of their desire to leave Europe". Also after realising the consequences of their actions there appear to be many regrexiters. I think that with both main political parties in disarray, the way forward is a general election. In which hopefully the population will take part in a more informed and involved way. In the meantime the rise of racism needs to be stopped and any way of allowing London to maintain links with other European cities and freedom of movement should be explored
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoI am delighted that we voted to leave. I am truly disappointed that London as a city voted to remain. There are many reasons why a voted to leave. Here are the main ones:
Show full commentGermany is getting to big and I am frightened of how powerful it is...
I am delighted that we voted to leave. I am truly disappointed that London as a city voted to remain. There are many reasons why a voted to leave. Here are the main ones:
Show less of commentGermany is getting to big and I am frightened of how powerful it is getting.
I am fed up of being ruled by people who, not only were not democratically elected but also who we do not fully know the names of. We are a mature country. We do not need the EU to tell us what to do. It is like an interfering critical parent that refuses to let its child grow up! We are big enough and strong enough to stand on our own.
We are an island. There are only so many people we can accommodate. That is why we need to control immigration. I am not xenophobic. I love our multiculturalism. There are only so many teacups you can fit on a tray.
I hate the way we have to hand so much money over to Brussels for them to waste. The UK needs that money.
I do not want Turkey to join the EU.
E17 Pioneer
Community Member 9 years agoKassandra, this is a thread on what London should so to manage Brexit. I am sure this site would welcome a reply that responds to the issue that has been raised.
gregmalaya
Community Member 9 years agoI agree 100% with all you say.
I used to be a BIG supporter of EU membership but not any longer.
Why can't our immigration department, since it already has a points system, refine that to include visas for all the EU people presently...
Show full commentI agree 100% with all you say.
I used to be a BIG supporter of EU membership but not any longer.
Why can't our immigration department, since it already has a points system, refine that to include visas for all the EU people presently employed in London provided they undergo criminal records checks?
Why can't we make individual free trade agreements with all the existing countries that we deal with? It surely can't be that difficult? Copy the EU agreement, print it off, have a meeting and agree that nothing has changed- we still want reciprocal trade and to keep existing talent, but don't want criminals or people who monopolise our social housing and only claim benefits.
I just can't see why that's such a difficult thing to do. We have 2 years- minimum in which to do it. The EU was great as a trading block, and its early human rights stuff was good- pioneering gay rights for example. Then it went loopy, resulting in our being unable to deport murderers and drug dealers and having to compensate terrorists whose Human rights" were infringed. Today again there are headlines in the Daily Mail about a convicted murderer from eastern Europe who came here, unchecked, as is normal, and murdered AGAIN.
The Mail claims there are 200 foreigners arrested each day in London Met area alone!!!
From the money we save from subsidising the rich landed gentry with mega EU farming subsidies, we can then afford to build far more social housing, so that nurses, once again can afford to live in London.
Show less of commentsimont
Community Member 9 years agoI am very worried that right wingers will use Brexit to wreck any environmental protections that the EU provided. We must aim for even stronger rules for air quality, water quality and wildlife protection.
Show full commentI am very worried that right wingers will use Brexit to wreck any environmental protections that the EU provided. We must aim for even stronger rules for air quality, water quality and wildlife protection.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoThe key issue for our community in Britain is our restricted views of nationhood and globalization. It is important to recognize that London has had the best chance to understand the benefits of the single market economy and free movement...
Show full commentThe key issue for our community in Britain is our restricted views of nationhood and globalization. It is important to recognize that London has had the best chance to understand the benefits of the single market economy and free movement of people. London is more sympathetic and has a greater understanding of emerging identities within a more fluid community of people. It has a better sense of the benefits of negotiating through business with our EU partners, the challenges and the successes. Going forward it is important to educate people across the country in a factual way about the benefits of engaging our partners within the EU and globally. It is important to take an outward looking approach to all our decisions. We are a divided nation at present and we need to start to openly celebrating our diversity and highlight the contributions of our different communities.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoRegardless of how different regions voted, the decision has been made, and London's role now is to work with Britain's Government to ensure the best possible outcome for the whole of Britain. There is no need for separate areas to be...
Show full commentRegardless of how different regions voted, the decision has been made, and London's role now is to work with Britain's Government to ensure the best possible outcome for the whole of Britain. There is no need for separate areas to be represented at any negotiations. The people who are authorised and entitled to attend those meetings, will be working for all of Britain. They are already aware of the differing circumstances of each area, and have no need of other people attending. London is a very large and diversified area, but it does not stand alone, and it must not be set apart, but work with the rest of Great Britain, to get positive results for everyone.
Show less of commentE17 Pioneer
Community Member 9 years agoGiven that most people who voted out of the EU were serving their best interests, Londoners have to do what serves their best interests too.
Show full commentNicola Sturgeon is protecting the wishes of those she represents, Sadiq Kahn should be able to do...
Given that most people who voted out of the EU were serving their best interests, Londoners have to do what serves their best interests too.
Show less of commentNicola Sturgeon is protecting the wishes of those she represents, Sadiq Kahn should be able to do the same. This is what politicians are elected for, to represent the wishes of their electorate. It is widely reported that many people who voted out wanted to kick big business, therefore it was not uppermost in their mind to 'get positive results for everyone'.Normally, I would agree with you, however this is the position we have been forced into.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoNo, I agree that would not have been at the front of their minds, and prior to the vote, there would have been numerous areas of interest which people were wanting to have benefit.
Show full commentSadiq Kahn is a London politician, which is on a different...
No, I agree that would not have been at the front of their minds, and prior to the vote, there would have been numerous areas of interest which people were wanting to have benefit.
Show less of commentSadiq Kahn is a London politician, which is on a different level to our National Government. OK he can work for the betterment of Londoners within Britain, but not in external negotiations.
The main point NOW is that the votes are counted, Britain will be leaving EU, as a whole, and so all areas and aspects operating and living under Britain, should have an obligation to work together to make it a success. Or are people with differences going to act like spoilt children who say "I didn't score, I'm taking my wickets home" Come on ! We're all better than that.
Joyce Clark
Community Member 9 years agoI think London should join forces with Scotland, Northern Ireland and Gibralta and force a second referendum with a 60% threshold.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoThe most important thing is to ensure that London's interests are represented in Brexit talks. Sadiq needs a seat at the negotiating table we have to campaign hard against anything that may damage London and the UK in general - with...
Show full commentThe most important thing is to ensure that London's interests are represented in Brexit talks. Sadiq needs a seat at the negotiating table we have to campaign hard against anything that may damage London and the UK in general - with special emphasis on the latter. A big part of the reason Leave won is that people outside of London have much worse life opportunities and there is massive resentment towards the perceived metropolitan elite.
Whether we supported Remain or Leave is irrelevant now, we have to work together. I supported Remain but the idea of somehow ignoring the referendum result is undemocratic. The people have spoken and London is never going to "leave" the UK.
Show less of commentMe101
Community Member 9 years agoMore powers to London, devolution with the view to go independent.
Me101
Community Member 9 years agoforgot to add: with either staying in the EU if possible (perhaps teaming up with Scotland?) or re-join. They should welcome us with open arms because we are affluent and progressive, upholding EU values. Support Scotland, they are...
Show full commentforgot to add: with either staying in the EU if possible (perhaps teaming up with Scotland?) or re-join. They should welcome us with open arms because we are affluent and progressive, upholding EU values. Support Scotland, they are struggling with similar issues in this regard.
Show less of commentjchollo
Community Member 9 years agoI'm afraid that people pushing for London are completely off the Ball, with their extreme and damaging suggestions, I hope most of you are joking, team up with Scotland, Ha-Ha! The Scots would welcome another hand out I'm sure. To be...
Show full commentI'm afraid that people pushing for London are completely off the Ball, with their extreme and damaging suggestions, I hope most of you are joking, team up with Scotland, Ha-Ha! The Scots would welcome another hand out I'm sure. To be successful we need to be united and encourage all sections of the UK to pull together, does anyone think that just because we are leaving the EU, that the way ahead has to be printed out perfectly for us, we should intend to work together for the good of all and not dream about what could be if,if and if!
Show less of commenttalk_london_us…
Community Member 9 years agoIt was known that referendums are not a British way to make decisions. We have a wonderful political system known as responsible democracy. The evidence suggests that many who voted for Brexit voted as a protest or wanted change not...
Show full commentIt was known that referendums are not a British way to make decisions. We have a wonderful political system known as responsible democracy. The evidence suggests that many who voted for Brexit voted as a protest or wanted change not necessarily to leave the European Community.
We are now in a period of uncertainty where many organisations will have to invest outside UK in case there is a restriction on movement of capital, trade and people. There is an urgent need to clarify the future and ensure that London has a proper voice in the UK which so far it has not had.
The referendum is an advisory as it is Parliament which takes the decision. Cameron is wrong to say that Brexit is the will of the people. It may be the will of some people and there is a need for each and every MP to find out more from their constituents to know whether there is a real desire by the majority to leave the European Union
It would also be rather helpful if the Brexit leaders would tell us what their proposals are for the UK in the future so we can all understand what we are facing.
.
Show less of commentlivehere
Community Member 9 years agoIt is a great pity they did not fully explain the possible Brexit scenarios well before the referendum, so people understood what they were voting for exactly. It is clear that a proportion of the voters still think they voted for immediate...
Show full commentIt is a great pity they did not fully explain the possible Brexit scenarios well before the referendum, so people understood what they were voting for exactly. It is clear that a proportion of the voters still think they voted for immediate expulsion of all immigrants, plus anyone with a slightly non-English surname, and maybe even German tourists. They, and even more Brexit voters, seem to think you can just magically and suddenly increase exports to non-EU countries to make up for the flight of investment, manufacturing, etc, and the turmoil of the transition period. And everyone forgot to mention that the UK is supposedly still groaning under the weight of staggering debt - hence the failure to put resources into the NHS and the areas with high immigrant influxes.
Show less of commentRs3
Community Member 9 years agoThey did.
However it was nullified by the Leave party labelling any suggestion that there would be difficulties as "Project Fear" along with the suggestion that "Project Fear" was entirely imaginary.
Now it is seen that the Leave party...
Show full commentThey did.
However it was nullified by the Leave party labelling any suggestion that there would be difficulties as "Project Fear" along with the suggestion that "Project Fear" was entirely imaginary.
Now it is seen that the Leave party stance was in fact "Project Crossed Fingers", the idea that none of the things that could go wrong would go wrong. Ther's an illusion that the many countries suffering financial impact as a result of the referendum will somehow be miraculously well disposed toward Britain as a result and grant them preferential trade status, or have, in the wake of their own economic difficulties, the money to buy what we want to sell.
In order to advance London, the problem will have to be solved elsewhere, in the areas where largely older voters who were often motivated by illusions of sovereignty or feelings of isolation and frustration at being 'left behind' by the pace of change in our society,.
As you imply what is needed is proper education, an idea unfortunately contaminated by reflections of "re-educattion" in certain Communist states or Blair's manipulative "Education, education, education". However, don't hold out hope. There are still people who, like some of the Greeks, believe that all that is needed is a programme of 'anti-austerity' and a denial of any debt.
Show less of commentjlynton
Community Member 9 years agoSorry, I meant to say just:
Declare London Independence and join EU!
jlynton
Community Member 9 years agoIt is unthinkable Declare London Independence and join EU!
Neil38
Community Member 9 years agoI would agree with the earlier posters that this does show a division with a lot of the rest of the country (although not all of it - tellingly Liverpool and Manchester largely voted alongside London to remain, as did Oxford and Cambridge...
Show full commentI would agree with the earlier posters that this does show a division with a lot of the rest of the country (although not all of it - tellingly Liverpool and Manchester largely voted alongside London to remain, as did Oxford and Cambridge (along with London, part of the Golden Triangle for university funding), and population hubs like Brighton and Norwich). Any idea of declaring independence like SIngapore, while not as outlandish as the idea of a second referendum, still seems a little pie-in-the-sky. But there is something true that a lot of citizens of London have more in common with people who live in Paris, Amsterdam and Berlin than they do, for the sake of argument, people who live in Plymouth or Sunderland. One idea already floated here is that London may be able to achieve a Freeport status, so that workers and businesses still have access to the single market and freedom of movement, and this might have some traction, but the most important thing that the rest of England and Wales will have to accept is that if they want to benefit from having a global city in their midst, and the taxes paid by this city, then in any future EU negotiations, sufficient weight has to be given to the views of the citizens and businesses of this global city.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoMany people came to London because it was the European hub for many industries including digital design in which I work in. The UK being a member of the EU and most specifically the free movement of people has allowed for the city to grow...
Show full commentMany people came to London because it was the European hub for many industries including digital design in which I work in. The UK being a member of the EU and most specifically the free movement of people has allowed for the city to grow by attracting top talent from all over Europe by its career opportunities and business growth. Usually, those people are on very well paid jobs which lead to massive income to the UK from tax.
Now without the free movement of people and access to the single market, the billions that the city generates every day would start to melt.
My suggestion would be immediate retention on all the money that the city generates so that it can be focused only on the development of the city itself, to improve housing, transport, infrastructure, etc. No money to be paid to the rest of the areas in the UK as it's commonly known that they have been on life support by the money that London is paying them for development. In those areas the majority chose to leave the EU, we chose to stay, so I would suggest we stop giving our money away.
Also, my second suggestion would be for the city to have an independent local government that can take decisions and makes deals even with the EU on its own. Regardless to what deals the UK negotiates with the rest of Europe. In the long shot, that would mean that people from the EU could come and work in London without any restrictions and it's growth to continue.
Show less of commentChris365
Community Member 9 years agoTricky. I think the whole country needs to act as one. London is indeed a bubble within the country. Very successful I know but to some extent it has taken energy away from the regions .
Show full commentRegardless of Europe where there seems to be no...
Tricky. I think the whole country needs to act as one. London is indeed a bubble within the country. Very successful I know but to some extent it has taken energy away from the regions .
Show less of commentRegardless of Europe where there seems to be no solution to please everybody we do need a sensible strategy to manage globalisation
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoYou have already said that once.
jchollo
Community Member 9 years agoChris365 and E17; Do have the right idea, work together to get the most from our independence from the EU. London should not be separate from the rest of UK this is simply a No,No! As far as the City bringing people from the EU here who...
Show full commentChris365 and E17; Do have the right idea, work together to get the most from our independence from the EU. London should not be separate from the rest of UK this is simply a No,No! As far as the City bringing people from the EU here who will earn and pay high taxes, what about the majority who come from outside the EU, don't they pay taxes also! Being London orientated many commentators do not know what has happen to the small towns around London, I did a survey of many of these towns that in the early '70's were prosperous now you will find that their shopping streets are mainly full of Charity Shops or boarded up! This is down to the ever growing City and Globalization sucking in workers who then have to spend time and money traveling into London. They don't all get the high salaries that some of you imagine!
Show less of commentE17 Pioneer
Community Member 9 years agoWhile we need to acknowledge the majority of the UK has voted to leave the EU, we should also acknowledge that the majority of London voted to Remain. If London takes a hit financially, then the rest of the UK will suffer alongside us. I am...
Show full commentWhile we need to acknowledge the majority of the UK has voted to leave the EU, we should also acknowledge that the majority of London voted to Remain. If London takes a hit financially, then the rest of the UK will suffer alongside us. I am already aware of business orders being cancelled, people in their twenties relocating overseas, house purchases being abandoned, and talk of head offices being relocated to EU zones. This reflects a general lack of confidence in London because of our withdrawal. If we are going to stop a full recession we need to get reassurances that London will not lose it's standing as an international city or lose it's special economic privileges, such as passporting to retain the 10bn per annum we generate via the City.
Show less of commentThe GLA should move towards further independence within the next two years, with more control over it's finances and politics, eventually becoming a special economic zone to generate trade of goods and services.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 9 years agoI'm backing Britain, what ever happened to positive thinking
E17 Pioneer
Community Member 9 years agoThe thread is asking for suggestions on how to move forward and quite specific suggestions on how to do that. The time for slogans is over, we now have to make a plan on what to do next.