The Mayor’s Budget for 2024-25
Closed
724 Londoners have responded | 19/12/2023 - 10/01/2024
Every year in December, the Mayor publishes his Consultation Budget for the year ahead.
This document sets out how he intends to deliver his priorities within the funding available to the GLA (Greater London Authority) and its five functional bodies. Together they're called the GLA Group.
The Mayor’s part of the council tax rates for 2024-25 are set as part of this budget process. They may need to rise by an additional £37.26 for an ‘average’ Band D household. This is the equivalent of around £3.10 a month.
The Mayor’s Budget focuses on a number of priorities, including:
- Keeping London safe, by being tough on crime and the causes of crime.
- Ensuring the Met and London Fire Brigade both have the resources they need to reform and serve Londoners effectively.
- Building more council homes and the homes Londoners can afford.
- Maintaining a world-class transport network in London.
- Continuing to offer free skills training to anyone who is unemployed or in low-paid work.
- Providing additional support for people during the cost-of-living crisis.
- Providing a mentor to all young Londoners in need and positive opportunities to young Londoners at risk of getting caught up in gangs and crime.
- Investing in green projects so we can continue to lead the way on tackling air pollution and the climate emergency – from making our buses zero-emission to planting over half a million trees.
What do you think of these priorities?
Tell us in the discussion below and help inform the final Budget.
The discussion ran from 19 December 2023 - 10 January 2024
Closed
Want to join our next discussion?
New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.
Join Talk LondonAlready have an account?
Log into your accounthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoStop providing additipnal support, plenty of second jobs around.
Stop mentoring, those that need it aren't interested.
Stop spending on "greenprojects", this can happen with normal renewal time scales.
Make public transport services more self...
Show full commentStop providing additipnal support, plenty of second jobs around.
Stop mentoring, those that need it aren't interested.
Stop spending on "greenprojects", this can happen with normal renewal time scales.
Make public transport services more self sustaining and not blindly subsidised.
Show less of commentgoya12
Community Member 1 year agoInvesting in green projects improves our environment, our health and is a very effective way to create jobs. London has a housing crisis as well and action is urgently needed there.
Show full commentInvesting in green projects improves our environment, our health and is a very effective way to create jobs. London has a housing crisis as well and action is urgently needed there.
Show less of commenthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoLondon running a huge overspend. Spending on "green" projects is not "investing" but just spending. Everywhere has a housing crisis and until the government makes "landlording" a viable proposition again there will continue to be a...
Show full commentLondon running a huge overspend. Spending on "green" projects is not "investing" but just spending. Everywhere has a housing crisis and until the government makes "landlording" a viable proposition again there will continue to be a housing crisis. One sure way to slow the housing crisis is to not accept migrants on to London housing lists.
Show less of commentBen Burt
Community Member 1 year agoGreen projects are investment for the future. And no need to be uncharitable to migrants, that's just mean spirited
FrancisW2014
Community Member 1 year agoAs the levels of air pollution on the underground network, particularly the Victoria and Noethern lines, are many times worse than those at street level, this should urgently become a priority. It is much more harmful than street level...
Show full commentAs the levels of air pollution on the underground network, particularly the Victoria and Noethern lines, are many times worse than those at street level, this should urgently become a priority. It is much more harmful than street level pollution.
Policing has become so under-resourced and inexperienced that the quality of service has noticeably reduced. An essential element in putting this right is adequate funding.
Show less of commenthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoAs there is no more money can you suggest where economies be made within the present massive budget to meet your funding needs.
Careoline
Community Member 1 year agoThere is plenty of money; but the ideology which has become default necessitates investing in death, not life.
Victoria007
Community Member 1 year agoLocal authorities would comply law and order on based on international standards to provide security to public in London through the law and stop defence for criminals traffickers to bcz abuse of law and position could be result of...
Show full commentLocal authorities would comply law and order on based on international standards to provide security to public in London through the law and stop defence for criminals traffickers to bcz abuse of law and position could be result of prosecution and law is qual for every body . So broken law is a serious criminal offence for same to authorities as well . Public sectors Need assessment to hold public service work for public interest for well being of all London’s same equal , rights, freedom and justice. Thanks
Show less of commentRoyP
Community Member 1 year agoThe most important matter to remember and act upon is to listen and take action on the views of the people of Greater London - ALL OF THEM!
Rainesixteen
Community Member 1 year agoThe price of the tube is an extortion. I have to go to work, so I have to take the tube. £7 a day is outrageous to travel in your own city. This is an abuse to your citizens. Houses are unaffordable and not meeting the standards of decent...
Show full commentThe price of the tube is an extortion. I have to go to work, so I have to take the tube. £7 a day is outrageous to travel in your own city. This is an abuse to your citizens. Houses are unaffordable and not meeting the standards of decent living. They are certainly not value for the money spent, especially considering that as soon as you step outside, the levels of crime are on the rise and the streets are dirty. You guys need to do something. You are failing your citizens. You care only about the most trivial things and the real problems are forgotten.
Show less of commenthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoRail costs are very high but when, for example, you consider what the salaries of train drivers are then high fare are needed to fund them. I wonder why train drivers get paid more than bus drivers as drivinf a bus requires more skils and...
Show full commentRail costs are very high but when, for example, you consider what the salaries of train drivers are then high fare are needed to fund them. I wonder why train drivers get paid more than bus drivers as drivinf a bus requires more skils and is more tiring than train driving.
Careoline
Community Member 1 year agoLet the drivers and people who actually work on the tube system have a genuine discussion about freezing prices and making a sustainable plan for the coming year which takes care of all staff and everybody using the system. It would be...
Show full commentLet the drivers and people who actually work on the tube system have a genuine discussion about freezing prices and making a sustainable plan for the coming year which takes care of all staff and everybody using the system. It would be insane to allow private profiteers to destroy what is meant to be a service for the public.
Show less of commentConsidered
Community Member 1 year ago- Safety: more police visibility and keep police stations open , including station in Notting Hill . Have police enforce shoplifting/ stealing laws. Staff in local shops like such as Tesco and Boots should have support from police...
Show full comment- Safety: more police visibility and keep police stations open , including station in Notting Hill . Have police enforce shoplifting/ stealing laws. Staff in local shops like such as Tesco and Boots should have support from police. Shoplifting costs everyone.
- Transport : stop cutting routes in west london RBKC which serve residents to get to schools and hospitals
- Housing : support the Government to change planning laws so more homes can be built affordably.
Show less of comment.
hampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoFully agree and consider that more boots on the ground patrolling streets and shopping centres are needed.
KerG
Community Member 1 year agoPublic safety is becoming more of an issue with rises in street crime. But how do you discourage youngsters (kids) from carrying weapons such as knives and discourage then from attacking other kids. A serious issue and challenge. Need to...
Show full commentPublic safety is becoming more of an issue with rises in street crime. But how do you discourage youngsters (kids) from carrying weapons such as knives and discourage then from attacking other kids. A serious issue and challenge. Need to look at what other large cities do to manage this. This also ties in with mentoring young Londoners.
The Met and Fire Brigade need more public support and less criticism. They need more people joining them so they can provide a greater service. But they do need positive recognition. And less of woke and brainless influencers who have their own agendas that do not fit with the vast majority of people.
With so much of the ideas and and priorities there's significant cost which can only be funded by increasing taxation of Londoners. Some ideas such as green projects and other fashionable items need to take a back seat so that more critical items that have much broader benefit and support can be accomplished.
Show less of commentEdwardsT
Community Member 1 year agoThe Mayor must invest more into active travel schemes. Report after report keeps telling us that active travel is closest thing we have to a magic bullet for helping to cure so many of society's ills, and will save society money in the long...
Show full commentThe Mayor must invest more into active travel schemes. Report after report keeps telling us that active travel is closest thing we have to a magic bullet for helping to cure so many of society's ills, and will save society money in the long run thanks to active travel having a high value return on investment (£4.30 for every £1 spent, according to DfT's latest figures). We literally cannot afford to cut back or slow down on building more cycle tracks, implementing more LTNs and other interventions.
Show less of commenthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoActive travel is a political catch phrase and just used to explain making us conform to unwanted and unrealistic "green" policies. All this costs more funding which means that taxes and levies will be increased to pay the bill.
LTNs are a...
Show full commentActive travel is a political catch phrase and just used to explain making us conform to unwanted and unrealistic "green" policies. All this costs more funding which means that taxes and levies will be increased to pay the bill.
LTNs are a misnomer in that they just redirect and funnel traffic into denser and slower routes creating higher levels of pollution.
Show less of commentEdwardsT
Community Member 1 year agoActual data, which those in power use to inform their decision making, suggests otherwise.
Show full commentActual data, which those in power use to inform their decision making, suggests otherwise.
Show less of commentqueenbee98
Community Member 1 year agoThe affordable homes scheme needs rethinking I barely hear of anyone been successful and you have to earn a lot to be eligible and the prices are still extremely high so it's not affordable and shared ownership is becoming more unaffordable...
Show full commentThe affordable homes scheme needs rethinking I barely hear of anyone been successful and you have to earn a lot to be eligible and the prices are still extremely high so it's not affordable and shared ownership is becoming more unaffordable with high services charges. Most young people are considering leaving as we can't afford to live here
Show less of commenthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoIt is quite logical for people, young or old, to move to where they can afford to live. "Affordable homes" is a political expression meaning taxpayer subsidised homes which is all very well but how many years is such taxpayer subsidy...
Show full commentIt is quite logical for people, young or old, to move to where they can afford to live. "Affordable homes" is a political expression meaning taxpayer subsidised homes which is all very well but how many years is such taxpayer subsidy expected to continue.
Show less of commentqueenbee98
Community Member 1 year agoWe shouldn't have to move out of London rent here is out of control and house prices are astronomical
Show full commentWe shouldn't have to move out of London rent here is out of control and house prices are astronomical
Show less of commentDavidTarsh
Community Member 1 year agoStop the woke green nonsense and make the traffic flow
EdwardsT
Community Member 1 year agoThe only way we can make traffic flow for the increasingly large amount of motor vehicles would be to bulldoze down houses, shops, schools and parks to enable more and wider roads. And only then will it only work temporarily due to a known...
Show full commentThe only way we can make traffic flow for the increasingly large amount of motor vehicles would be to bulldoze down houses, shops, schools and parks to enable more and wider roads. And only then will it only work temporarily due to a known phenomenon called induced demand. And then where would we drive to once all the building have gone? This is what's been happening in many US cities, hence why now so many amenities are so far apart and they have induced urban sprawl through mass car dependency. Is this what we want in London?
Show less of commenthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoStop on street parking and traffic would flow freely.
robinlmp
Community Member 1 year agoWhat’s really the aim here? Making ‘traffic flow’ doesn’t really achieve much in itself. If there are too many cars on the road, the most obvious solution is to reduce the number of vehicles; perhaps via a vehicle permit like they have in...
Show full commentWhat’s really the aim here? Making ‘traffic flow’ doesn’t really achieve much in itself. If there are too many cars on the road, the most obvious solution is to reduce the number of vehicles; perhaps via a vehicle permit like they have in Singapore. It would make vehicle ownership dramatically much more expensive. It would have a series of benefits:
1- reduce traffic and help make it flow better (if that is actually worth doing)
2- reduce pollution
3- raise a lot of money for spending on other more useful stuff
4- encourage other forms of more sustainable transport
Getting rid of vehicles from many streets would make them much safer and more pleasant places to be. That’s actually an aim worth targeting.
Show less of commentdlgardner
Community Member 1 year agoThe priorities are fine - thoguh would put the green priority much higher up. By being greener with Living Streets, we not only improve our air and reduce CO2, improve our health and wellbeing but also reduce crime and improve the sense of...
Show full commentThe priorities are fine - thoguh would put the green priority much higher up. By being greener with Living Streets, we not only improve our air and reduce CO2, improve our health and wellbeing but also reduce crime and improve the sense of community. It's a win-win-win. The GLA and TfL still hold omtop far too many undeveloped or under-dveeloped sites across London losing valuable revenues, as well as holding back opportunities for new social housing, green space and businesses. Station sites, vast unnecessary car parks (2300 spaces allocated to the O2 on Greenwich peninsuila alone) could all be redveloped for housing or green space. And much of the GLA estate (apart from heritage areas) could be covered in solar panels reducing running costs, CO2 etc.
Show less of commenthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoLiving streets is a meaningless phrase. People live, streets are for traffic. There will be no reduction in CO2 as the same traffic will still be therem just funneled into denser streets. What matters is to get traffic moving freely...
Show full commentLiving streets is a meaningless phrase. People live, streets are for traffic. There will be no reduction in CO2 as the same traffic will still be therem just funneled into denser streets. What matters is to get traffic moving freely with a minimum of disruption.
Show less of commentkrlondon
Community Member 1 year agoIs that it? One question about a budget of millions when Khan has already brought the city to its knees? The crime epidemic which he allows to grow, TfL bankrupt and refusal to restructure, the gridlock on the roads, the destruction of...
Show full commentIs that it? One question about a budget of millions when Khan has already brought the city to its knees? The crime epidemic which he allows to grow, TfL bankrupt and refusal to restructure, the gridlock on the roads, the destruction of business and jobs so he can grandstand on his political agenda and score points with his media circus? There is one better question and that’s who to vote for in May to stop the rot.
Show less of commentcrocodile
Community Member 1 year agoAnd the tories will do better ? No by the record of 13 years in national government where only the rich have prospered and 90% of us haven't .
hampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoNational government has no relevance here. London is ruled by Khan and his left wing cohorts who have proven they cannot govern within budget.
Show full commentNational government has no relevance here. London is ruled by Khan and his left wing cohorts who have proven they cannot govern within budget.
Show less of commentasifbaakza
Community Member 1 year agoI believe these are worthwhile ambitions. I would support the Mayor and his team to help achieve these
Show full commentI believe these are worthwhile ambitions. I would support the Mayor and his team to help achieve these
Show less of commenthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoWhat ambitions??
chessinguk
Community Member 1 year agoThe priorities appear to cover the most essential areas of concern, but I believe that providing more affordable housing should be the top of the list. Without safe, affordable homes Londoners will be unable to afford to pay for their...
Show full commentThe priorities appear to cover the most essential areas of concern, but I believe that providing more affordable housing should be the top of the list. Without safe, affordable homes Londoners will be unable to afford to pay for their travel and leisure activities, which impacts crime levels and prevents young people from settling in the city. Improving the wealth of the population enables more local services to be bought and used, which helps to grow the local economy. Sky high rents and house prices are a major issue for London and action needs to be taken to intervene in the market. With sensible planning policies for new homes and a strengthening of building regulations, a rebuilding programme can also offer benefits for climate change. London could lead the country in developing and Implementing a renewable energy, eco efficient, approach to new build if there was the impetus to do so. Barriers, such as the prevention of planning approval for solar panels on roofs in conservation areas should be removed to encourage more renewable energy projects. Investing in services for young people is also a priority. Youth services are at an all time low, but demand for such services remain high. London could and should harness the energy and enthusiasm from volunteers and voluntary groups to enable more services to be provided, help with capital funding to improve community buildings would make a huge difference. Our Scout Group needs capital funding to improve our site and buildings, but it is really difficult to get any help. An improved site would enable other services to be provided for the whole population to enjoy. Reducing isolation, improving fitness and health and well being as well as providing for young people. The cost benefits of such investment would prove to be well worth it.
Show less of commenthampshirehog
Community Member 1 year agoToo many people want to settle in London and as a start there should be a ban on new immigrants coming into London, this slowly reducing the demand.
All the other points require considerable funding but the Mayor has his own priorities which...
Show full commentToo many people want to settle in London and as a start there should be a ban on new immigrants coming into London, this slowly reducing the demand.
All the other points require considerable funding but the Mayor has his own priorities which do not accord with the people's priorities.
Show less of commentjstanley
Community Member 1 year agoI really appreciate the Mayor's efforts to tackle pollution in London despite getting a lot of pushback. I hope he can save the LTN currently under threat in various boroughs including Tower Hamlets. I would like him to continue all the...
Show full commentI really appreciate the Mayor's efforts to tackle pollution in London despite getting a lot of pushback. I hope he can save the LTN currently under threat in various boroughs including Tower Hamlets. I would like him to continue all the green initiatives- unlike all the politicans in Westminster he is rare in actually doing something towards mitigating the effects of Climate change.
Show less of commentDavidTarsh
Community Member 1 year agoI couldn't disagree more!
RalphY123.
Community Member 1 year agocannot see where crime has gone down. All I see is stabbing/ shooting/ violence on public transport/ and a lot of anti social behaviour.
It's great that the Mayor wants to build more housing but what about the infrastructure that also needs...
Show full commentcannot see where crime has gone down. All I see is stabbing/ shooting/ violence on public transport/ and a lot of anti social behaviour.
It's great that the Mayor wants to build more housing but what about the infrastructure that also needs to be upgraded due to these new homes.
My wife and I are pensioners and I am disabled, these proposed increases does not take into account what the local councils new rates will be.
it seems that council tax could actually increase by nearly £10.00 a month, how on earth do you expect pensioners and the low paid pay these increase?
The proposed council Tax does not take into account extra price increases for, food, heating, and day to day expenses that go up at the whim of increasing profits.
Show less of commentLyndyloo
Community Member 1 year agoMy comment here is that we NEED to get rid of Khan, the sooner the better he has ruined London with his ridiculous Ulez, road narrowing and shutting streets to traffic. Does the idiot not realize that by doing all the measures in the name...
Show full commentMy comment here is that we NEED to get rid of Khan, the sooner the better he has ruined London with his ridiculous Ulez, road narrowing and shutting streets to traffic. Does the idiot not realize that by doing all the measures in the name of 'Cleaner Air',, he is in fact making the air far far worse by causing all the traffic to back up and queue, spewing our noxious fumes. He is not going to stop traffic in London, it is a working city, hes just making air quality far far worse. He needs to get traffic moving freely again.l What is the point of the Park Lane cycle lane,????? for gooness sake cannot he not see how the traffic is taking hours to crawl along there now. There is a PARALELL cycle lane in Hyde Park, what is the matter with him???
Show less of commentdtwells
Community Member 1 year agoTotally agree. He constantly urges us to cycle or walk. At 81 and recovering from a heart attack he would be an accessory to my own death if I complied.
He or TFL have re routed so many buses I used to use ie Routes 171, 172, 9, 521...
Show full commentTotally agree. He constantly urges us to cycle or walk. At 81 and recovering from a heart attack he would be an accessory to my own death if I complied.
He or TFL have re routed so many buses I used to use ie Routes 171, 172, 9, 521 (withdrawn) and at the same time removed countless bus stops to make way for cycle lanes. Aldwych and Waterloo bridge and Blackfriars bridge are a disgrace. He will not be satisfied until he has dragged this city down to the same squalid level to that whence his forebears came.
Show less of commentRobert of Enfield
Community Member 1 year agoWe need to address the cost of housing and concomitant homelessness. As well as regulating overseas ownership we should clamp down on developers who sit on unused land as an inflation-hedge strategy and who renege on their affordable...
Show full commentWe need to address the cost of housing and concomitant homelessness. As well as regulating overseas ownership we should clamp down on developers who sit on unused land as an inflation-hedge strategy and who renege on their affordable housing and Section 106 duties. To help fund improvements we need to tap into the private wealth held by millions of better-off Londoners . Why not a ‘London Bond’ which better-off people like me can invest into to fund new social-rent housing, refurbishing derelict and empty buildings?
Show less of commentceddlyburge
Community Member 1 year agoBeing tough on crime has a long history of not working, probably because the problem has already occurred by the time people commit crime. You need to get in earlier to stop people becoming criminalised, and offer then a good life without...
Show full commentBeing tough on crime has a long history of not working, probably because the problem has already occurred by the time people commit crime. You need to get in earlier to stop people becoming criminalised, and offer then a good life without it.
The Met is probably in an even worse state than it was this year, and is now gaslighting us with lots of adverts talking about how diverse it is. I don't think it should get any more money, or even any money, without a complete overhaul.
There is enough housing in the UK, the problem is that all the jobs and money are in London, if we spread that around a bit I think the problem disappears.
The UK is a rich country, we should be able to do better for homeless people.
SimonL
Community Member 1 year agoThe UK is not a rich country at all! It has no money whatsoever and in fact has enormous debts and borrowings that it has no means of repaying.
Show full commentThe UK is not a rich country at all! It has no money whatsoever and in fact has enormous debts and borrowings that it has no means of repaying.
Show less of commentcrocodile
Community Member 1 year agoUK is actually in the top ten of countries' national wealth . It's just that the greedy rich hog most of it , backed by the tories .