Building new homes

Where should new homes be built to maximise the benefits for Londoners?

User Image for
Added by Talk London

In order to meet the needs of its rapidly growing population, it is estimated that London will need to build new homes at roughly double the current rate over the coming years.

What challenges do you think this poses for London? What do you think new homes need to deliver for London?

Where should new homes be built to maximise the benefits for Londoners?

The discussion ran from 05 September 2017 - 01 May 2018

Closed


Want to join our next discussion?

New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.

Join Talk London

Already have an account?

Log into your account
Comments (52)

Avatar for -

There seems to be no shortage of luxury flat building! Turn them into social housing.

Show full comment

There seems to be no shortage of luxury flat building! Turn them into social housing.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Vaquita

There's lots of little parcels of land lying vacant. Here's one to start with: on the corner of Brixton Hill and Dunbarton Road, close to Brixton Prison, there's been a fair sized piece of land vacant for several/many years. There's never...

Show full comment

There's lots of little parcels of land lying vacant. Here's one to start with: on the corner of Brixton Hill and Dunbarton Road, close to Brixton Prison, there's been a fair sized piece of land vacant for several/many years. There's never been any activity on it and it's also an eye-sore with hideous boarding round it, which has partly fallen down several times in high winds. There's room for a block of flats on it. Who owns it? Why is nothing being done to put it to use?

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I believe that we should challenge the notion that the housing crisis can only be solved by building more homes in the capital.

Firstly, we should ensure that there are no empty homes in London. That means insisting that people who own...

Show full comment

I believe that we should challenge the notion that the housing crisis can only be solved by building more homes in the capital.

Firstly, we should ensure that there are no empty homes in London. That means insisting that people who own properties live in them themselves or rent them so others can live in them. The number of properties kept on short lets, through companies like Air BnB, should also be limited. It is criminal that properties stand empty while people do not have a safe and secure place to live. And it is wrong to build high-rise, high-density housing all over the city, often on green space, when there are properties standing empty.

Secondly, we should convert empty office blocks to housing.

Thirdly, we should encourage businesses to move to parts of the country where there is less pressure on housing. This would do much to revitalise areas of the country that have limited job opportunity and take the pressure off housing in London.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Koala

Very good ideas!

Avatar for -

It will increase traffic, unemployment; limit parking spaces and school places; not to mention impossibility to get GP or hospital appointment.

Avatar for - Monarch butterfly

London is already an over-populated and overcrowded place. London will choke itself to death where any possible little space is utilised. Computer mapping may perhaps show the most "efficient" or "ideal" distribution of housing, but...

Show full comment

London is already an over-populated and overcrowded place. London will choke itself to death where any possible little space is utilised. Computer mapping may perhaps show the most "efficient" or "ideal" distribution of housing, but London is becoming a sterile, concreted over, nasty place where sterile monsters of glass and steel replace bushes, creating huge wind channels and sun traps. This WILL result in a city blighted with enormous HEAT in summers and STORMS throughout the year.

The way forward should be careful planning of births and influx of people into London, mixed with careful, considerate and moderate building/ planning, ensuring that pollution is kept to a minimum, and new green and wetland areas maintained and created throughout. Buildings should be impact assessed as to height, carbon foot print and "look/ feel". All property developers with huge portfolios are to be strongly encouraged to rent out at social rents and all empty properties should be seized and given to Council control to be rented out.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I agree we urgently need to reduce population growth.

Show full comment

I agree we urgently need to reduce population growth.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I agree with you Keela

Load more
Avatar for -

Having completed the main survey I found the question regarding selling land with conditions for social housing does not meet my views. Land is always at a premium, which cannot "grow" and from that point I don't agree with actually selling...

Show full comment

Having completed the main survey I found the question regarding selling land with conditions for social housing does not meet my views. Land is always at a premium, which cannot "grow" and from that point I don't agree with actually selling it. We should be keeping the freehold which means the land remains a community asset, if it is held by a formally created trustee owned asset company and cannot be used as an excuse for high value properties where in many cases the developer is keeing the freehold and then selling it, leaving the future owners and renters with an unknown cost/expense over which theere is no control.
The right to buy caused these problems and we have now lost huge numbers of better quality community assets at large discounts which has done nothing more than enrich a few against the benefit for the community.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Koala

I totally agree we shouldn't be selling it, but should be keeping it as a community asset.

Avatar for -

the main challenge is making money available. Followed by getting landowners to release and develop sites.
New homes need to provide security and permanence, not temporary stop gaps.
Where - brownfield sites nearer to employment...

Show full comment

the main challenge is making money available. Followed by getting landowners to release and develop sites.
New homes need to provide security and permanence, not temporary stop gaps.
Where - brownfield sites nearer to employment, communities, shops and transport.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Monarch butterfly

"...getting landowners to release and develop sites":

Absolutely not. Some land owners like to keep their land free from development. And that is their right. And the main challenge is not to make money available but to control...

Show full comment

"...getting landowners to release and develop sites":

Absolutely not. Some land owners like to keep their land free from development. And that is their right. And the main challenge is not to make money available but to control unsustainable increases in population.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

I agree that we need to address population growth. We have built vast numbers of new homes in London over the past 10 years, but it is not any easier to find a place to live. More homes just bring in more people. Now we have significant...

Show full comment

I agree that we need to address population growth. We have built vast numbers of new homes in London over the past 10 years, but it is not any easier to find a place to live. More homes just bring in more people. Now we have significant problems with air pollution, traffic congestion and pressure on public services, due to population growth.

When we build homes in London, they should be for Londoners. It is not fair to take away gardens and countryside from British people in order to provide housing for people from overseas.

Show less of comment

Avatar for - Vaquita

Build new homes on the land of those with the biggest gardens.

Avatar for -

There are plenty of brownfield sites in London, and for my mind, I think a simple open submission call for young architects to provide solutions - who genuinely live surrounded by these issues we face - would be a solution.

Show full comment

There are plenty of brownfield sites in London, and for my mind, I think a simple open submission call for young architects to provide solutions - who genuinely live surrounded by these issues we face - would be a solution.

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

We have used architects to design a really interesting small development on a brownfield site in South Croydon. We have never developed before. We were told by Croydon Council that the site had to be marketed for 18 months before we would...

Show full comment

We have used architects to design a really interesting small development on a brownfield site in South Croydon. We have never developed before. We were told by Croydon Council that the site had to be marketed for 18 months before we would be allowed change of use even though the only interested parties have been developers, but now after submitting our plans we have been told it will be refused. No reasons have been given so we have to wait until it is officially refused to find out. So, over 18 months have already passed and if we continue, it is likely to be another 18. It has cost us thousands of pounds for architectural drawings, surveys for traffic, flooding, a planning consultant etc. It would be a really interesting and architecturally different scheme from the norm but really, why should we bother?

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

These questions are beyond the scope of most Londoners. The mayor and Government departments are best suited to answer those questions. Please get your fingers out and deliver for us.

Avatar for -

where the homes are built is immaterial its the costs of those homes thats important

Show full comment

where the homes are built is immaterial its the costs of those homes thats important

Show less of comment

Avatar for -

Not immaterial - not in parks and on green spaces. Brownfield sites and derelict buildings, old railway sites etc. Competitions for good designs, places you'd want to live and play in, wetland to absorb floods, trees. Treat people with...

Show full comment

Not immaterial - not in parks and on green spaces. Brownfield sites and derelict buildings, old railway sites etc. Competitions for good designs, places you'd want to live and play in, wetland to absorb floods, trees. Treat people with respect - luxury flats aren't luxury, they are just clean, well insulated and well kept with a conciege - everyone needs that.

Show less of comment