• Reference: 2011/0654
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

TfL have recently advised my office that there are currently nine official companies permitted by TfL to sell abatement fittings to Londoner's who need to modify their vehicle in advance of phase 3 of the LEZ in 2012. Do you believe, like TfL, that nine official companies will create competitive prices for the consumer?

• Reference: 2011/0653
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

In the first, second and third quarters of the financial year 2010/11, what percentage of suppliers to the GLA group were paid within 10 days and what percentage of suppliers were paid within 30 days?

• Reference: 2011/0652
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

In the first, second and third quarters of the financial year 2010/11, how many SMEs registered with the GLA group received payment within 10 days?

• Reference: 2011/0651
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

How many suppliers are registered with the GLA group as SMEs?

• Reference: 2011/0650
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

How many attendees were there at each of your Community Conversations events in Croydon (14 Dec 2010) and Waltham Forest (24 Jan 2011), and how much did each event cost to put on?

• Reference: 2011/0649
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

What Events for London will the GLA and LDA be supporting in 2011/12?

• Reference: 2011/0648
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

Further to MQ176/2011 in which you revealed that the GLA has not submitted, nor worked in partnership to submit bid to the Regional Growth Fund, how will you ensure that London gets its fair share of funding from the Regional Growth Fund?

• Reference: 2011/0647
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

What further consideration have you given to the idea of being responsible for London's waterways? In your opinion what are the key strategic improvements which could be made to London's waterways?

• Reference: 2011/0646
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

Your objection to the variation of the s106 agreement for Streatham Ice Rink highlighted a 'grey area' in the current planning system when it emerged that the Local Authorities do not have to formally consult the Mayor on variations to s106 agreements. Given that s106 often safeguard the provision of key local infrastructure and affordable housing, are you seeking to ensure there is a formal mechanism for the GLA to be consulted on variations to key s106 agreements?

• Reference: 2011/0645
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 23 February 2011

Further to your objection to the relocation of Streatham Ice Rink to a temporary site, what steps are you considering to ensure the 'continuity of ice rink provision of a comparable standard'?