• Reference: 2016/1970
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

A constituent has contacted me about the longstanding problem of idling stationary coaches at the coach stand on Horseferry Road, SW1. Can you let me know what a) applicable non-idling regulations are in place and b) is TfL or Westminster Council the principle body responsible for enforcement of these regulations?

• Reference: 2016/1969
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

You pledged to be a 'Mayor for all Londoners' so will you therefore meet with Londoners concerned about the proposed Garden Bridge - via the organisation Thames Central Open Spaces - as well as the local Councillors of Bishops Ward to discuss the plans?

• Reference: 2016/1968
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

On 18 May 2016 on LBC radio, you said that £40,000,000 of public money had already been spent on the Garden Bridge. Will you provide accounts that show exactly how this money has been spent?

• Reference: 2016/1967
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

On 25 May 2016 in your oral update on the report of the Mayor, you stated that, "Of the £60 million of total public funding, £37.7 million has already been spent by the Garden Bridge Trust, £24.25 million of which came from TfL and £13.45 million from the Government." In making the decision not to cancel further funding for the bridge did you look at the full cost and benefit implications from now on, including maintenance obligations, or were you counting 'sunk costs' in your decision-making?

• Reference: 2016/1966
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

The report from Latin Elephant, 'The case for London's Latin Quarter; Retention, Growth and Sustainability' sets out a strategic vision for the development of the existing Latin American business cluster at Elephant and Castle and has wider applications for other ethnic minority business clusters across London. Will you support its recommendations and consider them for inclusion in the next revision of your London Plan and Economic Development strategy?

• Reference: 2016/1965
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

Given that the GLA is working with Southwark Council on the draft Old Kent Road Area Action Plan proposals, that could involve the removal of large quantities of industrial accommodation and businesses, have you carried out an assessment of existing economic activity and jobs in this area? Has there been analysis of the increasing demand for industrial and studio type premises? Please can you provide this information and break it down by economic activity, or if available by the UK Standard Industrial Classification?

• Reference: 2016/1964
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

A constituent has contacted me regarding sightseeing, film, photography and survey helicopters operating along the River Thames causing widespread noise disturbance. Given your ambient noise strategy responsibilities, will you make a representation to the Civil Aviation Authority calling for far tighter restrictions on sightseeing helicopters and permit system for other non-emergency services helicopter flights operating in London and along the River Thames in particular?

• Reference: 2016/1963
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

Thank you for my answer to question 2016/1588 relating to the new evidence and advice you received from London City Airport. Will you put this information into the public domain?

• Reference: 2016/1962
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

At the London Assembly Plenary meeting on 8 June 2016, you confirmed that your Ultra Low Emission Zone public consultation will include the North and South Circular Roads inside the ULEZ boundary. Will you also include TfL controlled roads outside the ULEZ boundary that have high residential populations and high traffic levels?

• Reference: 2016/1961
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 June 2016

With reference to the Government's stated intention of increasing the tax on diesel fuel, and given your commitment to tackle air pollution in London, will you lobby for levels that will significantly deter diesel vehicle usage?