Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

14 November 2016 “Conclusions and Recommendations" of the Tram Oversight Assurance Panel made for ratification by TfL MD Surface Transport

  • Reference: 2019/12000
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
In documents you provided in your response to Question 2018/2996 there is an agenda from London Trams “Oversight Assurance Meeting” dated 14th November 2016 which notes “Conclusions and recommendations by the panel and call to MD Surface Transport with the recommendation for ratification.” Please state what were the conclusions and recommendations.

Tram Oversight Assurance Panel

  • Reference: 2019/11999
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
In documents you provided in your response to Question 2018/2996 a reference is made to the tram oversight assurance panel. Who were the members of this panel, who did it report to and what were its terms of reference?

Conflict of Interest Concerns

  • Reference: 2019/11998
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
In your response to 2019/6073 you mentioned that a former TfL board member raised a question of conflict of interest to the Transport Commissioner with the Chair of the Audit and Assurance Committee copied in. What was the outcome of any investigation carried out by the TfL Commissioner and the Chair of the Audit and Assurance Committee relating to the board member’s conflict of interest question?

London Economic Action Partnership (LEAP)

  • Reference: 2019/11997
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
Please provide a comprehensive list of the individual schemes and businesses that have been funded by the London Economic Action Partnership (LEAP)?

Use of algorithms by the Metropolitan Police Service (2)

  • Reference: 2019/11996
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
Do you support policing by facial recognition algorithms being used in the capital?

Use of algorithms by the Metropolitan Police Service (1)

  • Reference: 2019/11995
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
Do you agree with the concerns of the Law Society in their report ‘Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System’ published in June 2019 that there are insufficient rules imposed on the growing use of algorithms by UK police forces to safeguard the rights and freedoms of individuals? If so what are you doing to address this with the Met Police?

Live Facial Recognition (7)

  • Reference: 2019/11994
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
What guidelines have been used for the compilation of the Live Facial Recognition (LFR) watchlist and who has oversight?

Live Facial Recognition (6)

  • Reference: 2019/11993
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
Does the Live Facial Recognition (LFR) watchlist include enrolled images of children?

Live Facial Recognition (5)

  • Reference: 2019/11992
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
What is the legal basis, if any, for the use of this technology?

Live Facial Recognition (4)

  • Reference: 2019/11991
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 20 June 2019
Who decided where the piloted Live Facial Recognition (LFR) sites were deployed?
Subscribe to