Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [20]

  • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004
I was not saying money was the object. This is the set-up cost being a very high cost at this moment in time. One of the issues around that is: would you accept that allowing a huge number of residents a 90% discount might risk compromising the success of the central London Congestion Charge?

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [19]

  • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004
Was there a vote on that?

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [18]

  • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004
Have you put it to the board in a vote?

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [17]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004
People manage with the Travelcard system and different zones without a degree in geography. But surely if you have one large zone, you are just encouraging people to drive more? If you have separate zones it actually undermines the whole idea of a Congestion Charge as a traffic reduction measure.

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [16]

  • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [15]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004
I like the idea of an extension. But is a single zone the right way forward?

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [14]

  • Question by: Angie Bray
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004
Can I just have one last question? That is " you touched on it " about the boundary, the western boundary. As you will be aware, I know, there is huge concern about this proposal, which would split the borough in two. What views have you got on that, and what would your advice be on that? Would you think that we should be considering other options, rather than just this one option, which has been put forward for consultation?

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [13]

  • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004
But one of the questions that I am interested in, and I know Angie (Bray) has got a similar question later on, is: can Transport for London go for the measures that are most cost-effective? One of the things that worries me continually is the huge budgets for these major infrastructure projects. When you look at the work done on the modal shift you can get out of travel planning and marketing, which are my special interest subjects, they actually produce fantastic results in a completely different way. If you look at the TfL budget, it is so geared towards...

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [12]

  • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004
The point I am making was a question of who is running London now? Will it be the Government or will it be you?

Westward Extension of Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [11]

  • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
  • Meeting date: 14 January 2004
If Labour Members of the Assembly heed Nick Raynsford's (Minister for Local Government) call to axe your budget, will you then just ditch some of the flagship projects? Which of your flagship projects will you ditch?
Subscribe to