Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Olympics (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Jenny Jones
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
It seems we are pitching the target very low so that we are not disappointed. Is the 12% figure for workers and athletes moving around the park?

Safety on the Tube (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
You appear to have anticipated the third question I was going to ask, which is whether anything has really changed since you made that remark, apart from the fact that you are now responsible for this so you are trying to talk it up instead of talking it down?

Safety on the Tube (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
Can I ask you to cast your mind back to 29 January 2003, when speaking to the BBC you told Londoners 'I do not think you can say to Londoners that they are safe on the Underground. They take a risk every time they get on and that is a disgrace.' Since you made that well thought out contribution to the safety discussion in London, there have been three derailments. What else has happened since then to change your view?

Safety on the Tube (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
Yet in your Mayor's Report which you have submitted for our consideration at this meeting, looking back on London Underground you state that it has a safety record to be proud of. Your view seems to have changed a great deal in 18 months. Which is it, a record to be proud of or a disgrace?

National Audit Office Report (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Richard Barnes
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
It is interesting that you use the words `where people want to travel" and `want to use it". You will obviously have related this to the West London Tram that has two-thirds of its length running through my own constituency. People there have read this report and not drawn the positive conclusion that you have reached. The report actually says that none of the schemes in England and Wales have achieved the passenger numbers forecast, that their revenue streams were not as forecast, they did not reduce congestion and they certainly did not improve regeneration. One wonders how and why...

National Audit Office Report (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
Would you agree with me that the National Audit Office report is very welcome because it is really worthwhile when we have these major capital projects to have an individual understanding of whether they do give benefits? Would you also agree that the second sentence of the question is totally inaccurate? It said that some of these schemes did not perform in their business case as well as was expected. It did not say that they did not reduce congestion; it did not say that they did not improve regeneration; it did not say that they did not get passengers...

National Audit Office Report (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Richard Barnes
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
It is an interesting way of avoiding the question. It did not bring enlightenment to the debate, or indeed comfort to the residents of West London. Your tram avoids Hayes, it avoids 4,500 new houses that you want to build on the Southall gasworks site, it actually avoids the centres of business and those that it does hit, it destroys. Come and visit West London. I know you were there twice during your election campaign. Come and walk the length of it and let me show you what it is really like.

National Audit Office Report (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Richard Barnes
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
The other issue you have stressed in your answers to the Assembly is that you were recently re-elected and the electoral mandate is very important to you. In my own constituency I received more votes than you did. Are you going to listen to the people of Hillingdon and Ealing and reject the West London Tram, because they have clearly expressed the view they do not want it?

National Audit Office Report (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Richard Barnes
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
It is an interesting way of avoiding the question. It did not bring enlightenment to the debate, or indeed comfort to the residents of West London. Your tram avoids Hayes, it avoids 4,500 new houses that you want to build on the Southall gasworks site, it actually avoids the centres of business and those that it does hit, it destroys. Come and visit West London. I know you were there twice during your election campaign. Come and walk the length of it and let me show you what it is really like.

Association of Nuclear Free Authorities membership fees (Supplementary) [6]

  • Question by: Graham Tope
  • Meeting date: 15 July 2004
So your criteria for the use of public money is solely your political views, provided it is lawful of course?
Subscribe to