Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Olympic Games (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Murad Qureshi
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
I totally agree with that. I think that the irony on that one was that it was one thing to not support the bid and quite another to support Paris, particularly from a party that is dripping with anti?Europeanism. More seriously, there was a meeting last Thursday where the Olympic boroughs in the East End together considered the Olympic planning applications. It is quite clear that they are very committed to the legacy issues. Are you satisfied that the Olympic venues will be of benefit to their local communities and not necessarily become expensive white elephants?

London's Sewers (Supplementary) [10]

  • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
Now that you are in the Labour Party you will back that up with influence with your Government?

London's Sewers (Supplementary) [9]

  • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
You have written to Thames Water to tell them to do it?

London's Sewers (Supplementary) [8]

  • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
Mr Mayor, I understand that Thames Water did try to put the interceptor pipe, a 20?mile?long pipe costing £1 billion, into the business plan, but when they got the business plan back after scrutiny by Government, this was taken out. However, I understand that you have now written to Thames Water to tell them to put this interceptor pipe, this £1 billion, into their business plan that they are going to present in December. Is that right?

London's Sewers (Supplementary) [7]

  • Question by: Jenny Jones
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
There must be ways that you can make offers to Thames Water and what they can do?

London's Sewers (Supplementary) [6]

  • Question by: Joanne McCartney
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
Thank you. We also heard yesterday at the Health and Public Services Committee from Thames Water and the Environment Agency that there were serious health implications from the raw sewage being let out into the river. I just wondered what your view was as to whether this may damage recreational use of the Thames?

London's Sewers (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Jenny Jones
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
What it means is that controls are actually too weak on these companies and on water quality. What can you do on that? Can you make some sort of recommendation to the Government?

London's Sewers (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Jenny Jones
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
Bearing in mind that this discharge was pretty much an environmental disaster and presuming there are going to be more discharges of this kind as other events overtake us, when do you think that this is going to become a real emergency, an emergency in terms of an emergency for London?

London's Sewers (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Jenny Jones
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
Jenny Jones (AM): Thinking about this referendum, I actually do not think that this really is a question to ask, is it? What you should be asking people is, 'Do you think that Londoners should pay for this, or do you think that the very profitable Thames Water company should actually pay for it itself?'

London's Sewers (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Joanne McCartney
  • Meeting date: 15 September 2004
Thank you. Given that this is such an important issue to Londoners, I wonder if you would consider having your office support the Assembly Scrutiny Committee in promoting our findings on the issue?
Subscribe to