Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [31]

  • Question by: Bob Neill
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
I think your spokesman, Rob Beasley, described the review as an internal review led by one of the Agency's officials, conducted by its staff; I would not describe it as an audit. You have described the role of Deloitte: it is your report, not Deloitte's.

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [30]

  • Question by: Sally Hamwee
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
The report refers to, I quote, 'Having identified weaknesses in LDA project management and record keeping'. Does that lead you to have concern about other projects? Are you intending to carry out any reviews or audit work on other projects?

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [29]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
Have you made any attempt whatsoever to contact any of them to contribute towards this review?

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [28]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
Finally in terms of process, you mentioned that you have interviewed or taken evidence of the internal issues within the LDA and the people that currently work for the LDA. How many people are there that have left the LDA that were involved in these particular allegations that have therefore obviously not been interviewed or reviewed?

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [27]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
Not at this stage. Are you intending to then?

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [26]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
How are you going to conduct this sampling process?

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [25]

  • Question by: Tony Arbour
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
So you are telling the Assembly that, simply based on the information that you held in your records, on the assumption that all of your records were complete, you were able to come to a conclusion with regard to what Brenda Stern said, that as far as you were concerned there is no case to answer? Would not the obvious thing for you to have done have been to go to the source of the allegations? Is that not an elementary thing to do? Why did you limit your investigation just to the material which you say that you hold?

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [24]

  • Question by: Bob Neill
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
Or any of the people who are involved in the running of the organisations, obviously?

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [23]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
Have you referred it then fully to the District Auditor and said, 'We think there is further work that needs to be done'?

Review process of LDA funding (Supplementary) [22]

  • Question by: Tony Arbour
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
When you say that you are making all of the files available, will you understand our scepticism when earlier this year the Assembly's Economic Development, Culture, Sport and Tourism Committee asked lots of questions about the Bernie Grant Centre and we were originally told that there were only a few sheets of information available but then, when we asked for the matter to be investigated more closely, 40 cartons of papers were made available? It is very difficult for us on that basis to know what precisely is going to be the full information that you hold.
Subscribe to