Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • Legacy Master plan for the Olympic Park (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    And what is the answer to my question? Why did nobody provide coaches, buses or train tickets and depend on the parents driving 300-mile round trips every weekend?
  • Legacy Master plan for the Olympic Park (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    My final question is to Seb. Seb, does it worry you, as I am sure it should, that we keep reading things in the press about divers having to go to Sheffield and cyclists having to drive round the M25 in rush hour during the week in order to be able to train? Nobody could have foreseen that there were going to be problems with Crystal Palace? Surely these are the people that you are trying to inspire; these are the people that you are reaching out to so successfully. Once you realised that these people had to go to...
  • Mitigating the Games-time Environmental Impact (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Can I go back to the sustainability announcement that was alluded to earlier and is presumably what you were just referring to, Seb. What is that? Is that further commitments or is that the reality behind the commitments that have already been given? That is the first question. Then in terms of the scope of it, you have said it was kind of biodiversity and so forth, but is it sustainability in an economic, social and environmental sense or is it essentially still environmental-related commitments?
  • Recycling Rates

    • Reference: 2002/0217-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Much of the draft waste strategy, rightly, concentrates on improving recycling rates on some of the worst performing boroughs in London. What incentives are there for Councils already achieving pretty high rates of recycling? .
  • Recycling Rates

    • Reference: 2002/0222-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    What funding have you and/or the Mayor been able to secure from Central Government to help improve recycling rates across London? Given all the statements that both you and the Mayor have made on this topic, does incineration have any place in the future disposal of London's waste? .
  • Consultation

    • Reference: 2002/0220-1
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    How are you engaging in consultation with existing waste disposal authorities in London, and how are these consultations going? .
  • Kerbside Collections

    • Reference: 2002/0223-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Are you certain you and your officers really understand the problems involved in increasing recycling rates by using kerbside collections only? .
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Would you not accept though that the majority of the money thus far has, as I say in my question, probably rightly been distributed to the low performing boroughs. What I'm really wanting to get at is what incentive there is for the high performing boroughs, those boroughs who have already made it a priority, actually to receive some reward, some recognition, from the distribution of this money.
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Are you telling me then that the priority is not to give the money to low performing boroughs in order to drive them up. Surely, that is the priority.
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Would you agree with me that probably the single greatest factor, and there are many factors, but the single greatest factor in what has determined up to now, what is a relatively high and a relatively low performing borough, is actually the political will to do so, and making it a political priority? And if you do agree, then what evidence and what monitoring are you doing to ensure that we get value for money from the significant sums of money now being put into traditionally low performing boroughs, who demonstrably have never made it a priority?