Building Strong Communities
Open
1080 Londoners have responded

Idea generation
Age proofed local areas
London will have a growth in the number of over 65s and needs to be age friendly. Sadly despite a commitment to London becoming age friendly there hasn't been much progress ! What's required as a starting point is that neighbourhoods take into account age friendliness - amenities for older people, accessible transport, toilet provision and places to sit down. The GLA could develop an age friendly kite mark to signify that town centres and shopping centres are age friendly and have been assessed with the involvement of older people.
Timeline
London’s recovery from COVID-19 – what you told us so far
HappenedHow your feedback has started to shape London’s road to recovery
HappenedNovember 2020: Building Strong Communities workshop with 200 Londoners
HappenedJanuary 2021: Volunteering summit with Londoners to discuss the opportunities and challenges around volunteering
HappenedApril 2021 - 2 workshops with 30-40 stakeholders on the Civic Strength Index
HappenedApril 2021 - 2 workshops with 30-40 Londoners on the Civic Strength Index
HappenedShare your ideas to reimagine London
HappenedYou and other Londoners have shared 166 ideas
Have a look
Want to have your say next time?
New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.
Join Talk LondonAlready have an account?
Log into your accountbg
Community Member 3 years agoI think it would be wise to look at widening pavements, this will allow people to get around more easily on our high streets, as well as making them safer for all.
Show full commentThis may mean taking space from road users (oh no)/s
Having reliable and...
I think it would be wise to look at widening pavements, this will allow people to get around more easily on our high streets, as well as making them safer for all.
Show less of commentThis may mean taking space from road users (oh no)/s
Having reliable and accessible transport should always be a priority.
Additionally this will allow more seating to be placed around our high streets.
Shops should welcome those that are elderly or disabled to use their toilet facilities. Maybe show a bus pass for free access? As a younger individual I know to buy something first but I also have good control of my bladder where others may not.
livehere
Community Member 4 years agoReimagining London - the current GLA programme for high streets is nice but risible, not nearly enough. Proper and serious redesign is needed, looking at London as a whole and planning where to demolish and rebuild, and where there is the...
Show full commentReimagining London - the current GLA programme for high streets is nice but risible, not nearly enough. Proper and serious redesign is needed, looking at London as a whole and planning where to demolish and rebuild, and where there is the possibility of upcycling and reshaping. The pressure should be taken off the centre of London by creating a network of local town centres, each with its own characteristic identity, each offering an attractive 'square' (whatever shape), very green, with children's play areas, cafes, restaurants, local hubs for those working at home, plus arts centres, leisure centres of various kinds, museums, other attractions. Through roads should avoid residential areas, and avoid the 'town centre' - get the high streets off the main roads. Public transport between these centres should be as important as routes to/from Central London. These centres should be tourism attractors in their own right, with accommodation to match.
Show less of commentlivehere
Community Member 4 years agoA kite mark is a good idea, but LAs have to want to achieve it, so it has to have status. The problem we have in my area is that the local BIDS has no community input, no community improvements, and the LA and TfL are making changes that...
Show full commentA kite mark is a good idea, but LAs have to want to achieve it, so it has to have status. The problem we have in my area is that the local BIDS has no community input, no community improvements, and the LA and TfL are making changes that impact on the local population, including the elderly, without taking any notice of what residents have said in the 'consultations'. There are no longer buses that take residents directly to local hospitals, or to the other hospitals and health facilities that the NHS has concentrated services in, at a distance from the West End. For the less abled residents, who used to be able to take two buses to reach their appointment location, routes cuts mean they now have to take three buses. No local runner bus/vehicle has been provided to take such residents, or less-abled shoppers/diners, to the bus stops of services that have been moved. The transport needs of less-able shoppers/tourists have been ignored despite representative groups expressing their concerns about this problem during consultations. Older people, less able people - they are just not a big enough market for the commercial interests to care, and it is they who rule the 'place-making'. The LA seems to have no interest at all except in putting on a show of consulting, ticking boxes, but with no intention at all of allowing the views or needs of any local residents or groups representing people who are less able to actually influence their 'place-making' designs at all. There are clearly no real teeth to any policies that do require less-abled or elderly people's needs to be catered for in town planning/place-making,/public realm design. Which is the opposite of the original definitions of place-making - a term co-opted by traffic planners to make them appear to be responsive to sustainability principles & human-centred design.
Show less of commentPositive Agein…
Community Member 4 years agoYes, a kitemark has to have status and be used by London Boroughs. But I see it as a small step in pushing for greater awareness of older people's needs. Agree with everything you've said and what surprises me is how officials and...
Show full commentYes, a kitemark has to have status and be used by London Boroughs. But I see it as a small step in pushing for greater awareness of older people's needs. Agree with everything you've said and what surprises me is how officials and councillors forget older peoples varied needs (or categorise everyone in the over 55 age group as vulnerable !). There is as you say not the right recognition in place shaping. The danger is that this gets worse or just becomes tokenistic. Positive Ageing in London have looked at what London boroughs are doing by way of recovery (the oft quoted "Building Back Better") and the overall assessment is that older people aren't featuring much in recovery plans or certainly not in the right way - see: https://wiseage.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Borough-recovery-plan…
Show less of commentWe are also keen on "age proofing" the London recovery Board missions but it's a bit of an uphill struggle so the greater awareness of the challenges the better so I thought you post very well timed ! Thanks