Address challenges with technology
What are the most important challenges facing London that we should address with technology?
New technologies can change the way we live, work and communicate. They will also help London better manage the pressures of its growing population.
What are the most important challenges facing the city that we should address with technology? An example could be air pollution monitors to map the most polluted roads.
The discussion ran from 13 March 2018 - 01 May 2018
Closed
Want to join our next discussion?
New here? Join Talk London, City Hall's online community where you can have your say on London's biggest issues.
Create a Talk London accountAlready have an account?
Log into your accountAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 5 years agoI don't think there's anything wrong with the question (What are the most important challenges facing the city that we should address with technology?). The answers already breakdown into two themes: transport and pollution. What else might...
Show full commentI don't think there's anything wrong with the question (What are the most important challenges facing the city that we should address with technology?). The answers already breakdown into two themes: transport and pollution. What else might people have suggested? Taxes? Health? Housing? It's all "grist to the mill" as they say.
Personally, commuting is the biggest disadvantage of living in London. In the last 25 years there has been a huge improvement in keeping commuters informed of infrastructure problems and journey planning. But what all about all real-time data on passenger journeys? I might change my route to avoid unusually large crowds, for example.
Show less of commentLady Iveta
Community Member 6 years agoI wish more transport on all celebration days. Old and new technologies are welcome to help to move around.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoI think that this is a badly phrased question; there are too many assumptions it makes.
The primary assumption is that technology will solve a problem. The problems London has are going to take a lifetime or two to solve - certainly beyond...
Show full commentI think that this is a badly phrased question; there are too many assumptions it makes.
The primary assumption is that technology will solve a problem. The problems London has are going to take a lifetime or two to solve - certainly beyond the political lifetime of the current London Assembly or current Government. The variables that need consideration add to the actual problem.
All the factors in solving a single issue need considering before any plan is started. Yes, technology MAY play a part both during analysis and during implementing a solution - but first make sure any technology will play a cost-effective part.
An example of recent bad technology is the introduction of smart energy meters: they work but change provider and you hit problems - the technology fails to do the very task it was promoted to do.
Another is the over use of passenger information on London buses: telling the passenger the bus is ready to move so be prepared .. after the bus has moved - whoops!
Please withdraw this topic from the forum and re-think how you should phrase it. You risk getting very specific requests, like bus arrival information or to provide car parking availability via smartphone.
Show less of commentCrosby8298
Community Member 6 years agoMore spin with no positive solutions to this crises of environmental disaster..Third runway plus Heathrow expansion is a disaster waiting to happen..Tory government will do anything to avoid their responsibilities...Its their daily business...
Show full commentMore spin with no positive solutions to this crises of environmental disaster..Third runway plus Heathrow expansion is a disaster waiting to happen..Tory government will do anything to avoid their responsibilities...Its their daily business as usual corrupt / ill fated failed policies.
Show less of commentThat is the problem...NOT the solution!!
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoTechnologies available today are very useful tools for individual convenience such as phone apps but the flip side of this coin is that organisations use technology to shed jobs and erect barriers in the form of websites so that there are...
Show full commentTechnologies available today are very useful tools for individual convenience such as phone apps but the flip side of this coin is that organisations use technology to shed jobs and erect barriers in the form of websites so that there are less people to talk to and getting through to anyone who can solve your problem is a lot less likely.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoThis is such an open ended question and meaningful analysis of the comments will be almost impossible as a consequence.
Show full commentFor example new technology in motor vehicles will make them cleaner.
New advances in Medical equipment technology will...
This is such an open ended question and meaningful analysis of the comments will be almost impossible as a consequence.
Show less of commentFor example new technology in motor vehicles will make them cleaner.
New advances in Medical equipment technology will make diagnosis quicker & more accurately, while being available remotely.
Sensors in the street will allow a bill to be created when the vehicle leaves the parking space such that parking tickets & wardens would be consigned to history.
Intelligent traffic signals could reduce congestion.
Better technology in building would allow houses/office to be build more quickly & be more sustainable.
We can have driver-less trains greatly increasing productivity and reducing travel costs dramatically. Actually the DLR has operated as such since its inception; why not all tube lines?
Of course technology advances have to be seen in terms of what change they can enable economically & effectively not just as a fashion statement.
But new Technology should be embraced by all in London with the GLA taking the lead on implementing new systems in a joined-up fashion.
Driver-less cars will help reduce traffic on London's roads and reduce the cost of travelling notably to Mass Transit. What plans do the GLA/TfL have their early adoption and here probably the suburbs would over the best returns on investment?
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoI want a vending machine that gives me money every time I pick up a bottle or can from the gutter.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoElectronic schedules at every bus stop would help us to know whether to wait or to get some exercise walking to the next bus stop. The schedules on the internet are very useful for this purpose, but I don't understand why there aren't...
Show full commentElectronic schedules at every bus stop would help us to know whether to wait or to get some exercise walking to the next bus stop. The schedules on the internet are very useful for this purpose, but I don't understand why there aren't displays at every bus shelter.
Show less of commentHenry46
Community Member 6 years agoI understand about the Charges being bought in for ULEZ charge in the congestion charge area but considering to take it out to the south and north circular, it will cripple people's jobs as low paid workers cannot afford to pay these...
Show full commentI understand about the Charges being bought in for ULEZ charge in the congestion charge area but considering to take it out to the south and north circular, it will cripple people's jobs as low paid workers cannot afford to pay these charges,I fear there will be more people having to apply for benefits as they will have to be in the position to leave there jobs making unemployment even more.low paid workers are already struggling just to pay bills and look after there families, with no extra money or get into even more debt just to be able to work and not be able to pay for replacement vehicles and not have to pay the charge that is being considered in the future. After all it was the government that urged people to buy diesel which has been done by myself it was over £12.000 just to be able to work, I ask the mayor to consider people's future with there jobs.most vans are diesel. I agree with the charge in the city to make it a better place but outside of the city I am sure so many WORKERS feel the same.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoYes, I think there should be better distinction between those driving for WORK and those who can't be bothered to get out of the supercar. I think there should be exemptions and/or grants to help workers upgrade their vehicles. Plumbers...
Show full commentYes, I think there should be better distinction between those driving for WORK and those who can't be bothered to get out of the supercar. I think there should be exemptions and/or grants to help workers upgrade their vehicles. Plumbers, for example, cannot rely on public transport because they need to bring a large amount of equipment to every job. They also have to travel at short notice to purchase parts from specialist shops, without making the customer wait a long time.
Taxi-drivers have to use the taxi - they can't work by riding a bus!
It's hypocritical that TfL does not pay a charge for dirty buses! The railway replacement buses can be even worse: coaches and very old vehicles. Yet they don't see to carry a penalty charge.
Show less of commentC.Alvin Scott
Community Member 6 years agoThe issues involved with Fossil Fuels have been well known since 1990 by the likes of Shell and the Auto Industry. It is clear that these people and the Governments are at fault. These people should pay these charges. Likes of VW have...
Show full commentThe issues involved with Fossil Fuels have been well known since 1990 by the likes of Shell and the Auto Industry. It is clear that these people and the Governments are at fault. These people should pay these charges. Likes of VW have caused billions of tonnes of CO2 NOx and PM as a result of their criminal actions.
They have carried on regardless and as someone else states if these extra deaths were caused by another means, with knowledge aforethought the people responsible would be in jail.
I will state quite clearly and have been doing so directly, that Advanced Propulsion Centre UK and Affiliate University, firstly stifled my Hydrogen concept from funding and then Blocked it from funding. This is not about whether or not my engine will work, it is that they are opposed to hydrogen that might work and promote Hydrogen which they know will not lead to mass take up due to expensive H2 FCEVs.
Developing a H2 Engine offers the lowest cost and quickest route to Affordable Zero emissions EVs. Battery EVs will require monumental costs for Battery Giga Factories predicted at $200 billion then there is increased generation and grid upgrades and where there is no grid ????.
Further development of H2 On board production unit to match the engine will not need H2 Fuel Stations and allow EVs to be used anywhere in the World. Also provide generating ability for countries with poor or no Grid.
Show less of commentShepstar36
Community Member 6 years agoTechnology can only help if it can cap private rents so that the social cleansing of London can end. Also, it can help if it can prevent rogue landlords from renting out tiny and squalid accommodation or overcrowding properties. Standards...
Show full commentTechnology can only help if it can cap private rents so that the social cleansing of London can end. Also, it can help if it can prevent rogue landlords from renting out tiny and squalid accommodation or overcrowding properties. Standards are dropping and the city is being taken over by rich investors. This does NOT make for a pleasant city in which to live and work.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoAgreed.
I shan't mention immigration today.
Millefleurs
Community Member 6 years agoI would prefer streetmap to google maps which are little more than character maps.Google maps does not provide enough detail in a constantly changing built up area. Bring back Geographers' A - Z. Also online directions often include so many...
Show full commentI would prefer streetmap to google maps which are little more than character maps.Google maps does not provide enough detail in a constantly changing built up area. Bring back Geographers' A - Z. Also online directions often include so many shortcuts that makes finding the side streets more time-consuming with a character map provided by the mobile network provider.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoYou can buy a new A-Z at Tesco/Waitrose or a used one on E-bay. The A-Z is still being published, as well as cheaper versions of the same thing, e.g. one by Collins that has larger images. WHSmith stock a vast collection of them.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years ago1. APIs for all public data. Tim Williams of TfL has ana amazing blog on this. Should really be adopted more. You are your own best example! https://blog.tfl.gov.uk/author/tmwllms/
2. Borrow some stuff from software development....
Show full comment1. APIs for all public data. Tim Williams of TfL has ana amazing blog on this. Should really be adopted more. You are your own best example! https://blog.tfl.gov.uk/author/tmwllms/
2. Borrow some stuff from software development. 'Motivation modelling' to help agree underlying goals, drivers and outcomes which will be agnostic of specific initiatives, but will help drive one unified 'vision'. Have a backlog of things you want to get sorted, show what those things are dependent on and then announce when issues on the backlog are solved (very twitter friendly!!).
3. Ditch Windows and make all public workers and civil servants use Linux. London can lead the charge on a free, open and sustainable future! It's really good now! Linux Mint (https://linuxmint.com/) looks just like Windows but slightly prettier, is free and would mean that London isn't reliant on the whims of one American company!
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoPlease don't waste our taxes switching the whole of government over to Linux.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoI second this!
1. Your biggest issue is from silo working. APIs can help bridge those gaps.
Show full comment2. Expand on your goals - technology could achieve a lot of things! It needs direction and vision.
3. Small start, big change to implement. You can...
I second this!
1. Your biggest issue is from silo working. APIs can help bridge those gaps.
Show less of comment2. Expand on your goals - technology could achieve a lot of things! It needs direction and vision.
3. Small start, big change to implement. You can reduce costs by improving your procurement, most orgs now use Linux and it works the same way as Windows, just a different skill set to ask for when hiring for your sysadmin team.
vindal000
Community Member 6 years agoThe city isn't polluted because of a lack of a lack of technology. Removing petrol and diesel cars well in advance of current schedule would be the first step - I would allow 5 years max.
After that, a city not dominated by cars would be...
Show full commentThe city isn't polluted because of a lack of a lack of technology. Removing petrol and diesel cars well in advance of current schedule would be the first step - I would allow 5 years max.
After that, a city not dominated by cars would be where tech could help - self driving electric cars parked in central hubs as opposed to on the street outside homes, where they take up a huge proportion of our outside public spaces. Speed bumps could be removed and top speeds limited by the road you're on
Show less of commentDiana Taylor
Community Member 6 years agoPortable monoxide detectors to be carried by road traffic officers to check pollutant levels at every traffic stop, with commensurate powers to remove polluting vehicles immediately from use, with subsequent costs met by the user/operator...
Show full commentPortable monoxide detectors to be carried by road traffic officers to check pollutant levels at every traffic stop, with commensurate powers to remove polluting vehicles immediately from use, with subsequent costs met by the user/operator.
Show less of commentA quality control app to raise the quality of roadway and footpath repairs/cyclical maintainence, to a universal standard, Londonwide. Too many repairs appear to fail far too quickly, the app could include photo's of the finished work, ensuring higher conttractor standards and enable better long term quality control. There are also benefits in that better controls of materials and human resources will result.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoWe could have a litter-bug detector. If you drop something, a loudspeaker could hurl abuse at you until you pick it up!
Microbe
Community Member 6 years agoWe hear right now how Facebook and companies who FB share our data with betray the confidentiality of ordinary users of social media and users of the internet in general by trading us and our data as 'meat' for online commercial and...
Show full commentWe hear right now how Facebook and companies who FB share our data with betray the confidentiality of ordinary users of social media and users of the internet in general by trading us and our data as 'meat' for online commercial and corporate predators. These 'predators' are able to access and manipulate our private data at their will. And, there's little the computer user can do about it.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoKeep away from social media! Unless you need to use it for business. Then give yourself a made-up name.
C.Alvin Scott
Community Member 6 years agoYou might add to that "They have manipulated people into voting a particular way by targetted misinformation to targetted individuals"
drlyndon
Community Member 6 years agoI'm not sure how good this question is in the first place. We should clearly identify problems faced by Londoners, then choose specific solutions (which may be high tech or low tech!) to address that specific problem, cost-effectively...
Show full commentI'm not sure how good this question is in the first place. We should clearly identify problems faced by Londoners, then choose specific solutions (which may be high tech or low tech!) to address that specific problem, cost-effectively. Therefore this question might be better posed multiple times, each for a different problem, rather than in such a general way.
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoThe human brain is far simpler to use!
Jfry
Community Member 6 years agoI think something needs to be done to address the technology that’s already in place. For example, the UX interface for the new large ticket machines is terrible.
Keep it simple. Don’t over complicate things, and keep the messaging clear...
Show full commentI think something needs to be done to address the technology that’s already in place. For example, the UX interface for the new large ticket machines is terrible.
Keep it simple. Don’t over complicate things, and keep the messaging clear and precise.
Don’t make technology a hindrance.
Show less of commentJulia lafene
Community Member 6 years agoSuggestion 1) Someone mentioned materials which absorb pollution- I have heard there are 'smart' road surface & building materials which do this. These need to be made mandatory when erecting new buildings and repairing roads. It may...
Show full commentSuggestion 1) Someone mentioned materials which absorb pollution- I have heard there are 'smart' road surface & building materials which do this. These need to be made mandatory when erecting new buildings and repairing roads. It may cost more but in the end will be cost effective.
2) Rubbish and plastic are other sources of pollution. there are bacteria which can eat them I have heard!
3) Biodegradable packaging needs to be encouraged at all levels.
4) Power generation - could there be more environmental ways of doing this at a local level?
Show less of commentAnonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoWhat's the point in having biodegradable rubbish sacks if they only get burned anyway? Polythene burns instantly.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoLocal power generation: collect our wind in a jar...
snowball
Community Member 6 years agoNo one has to be pollution- so using technology to monitor and advise on levels would focus people's thoughts
welshn0
Community Member 6 years agoWhen Sadiq Khan says hate crime & new technologies, I think 1984 thought crime.
Anonymous - account deleted
Community Member 6 years agoHa-ha-ha! I love it! Let's think up solutions to the rising population, but suggesting we control it is a "thought crime", according to City Hall.