• Reference: 2014/2750
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

The Metropolitan Police has previously confirmed in response to question 2014/2364 that 'There are approximately 2,511 nominal records currently held within the NDEDIU, which are subject to continuous review with the view to deleting any records which bear no relevance to our policing purposes.' For the avoidance of doubt, it is my understanding from the Court of Appeal proceedings in his case, that Mr John Catt is an individual about whom 'intelligence records' are retained. Please confirm how many other individuals have information about them retained by the NDEDIU in 'intelligence records'?

• Reference: 2014/2749
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

The Metropolitan Police has previously confirmed in response to question 2014/2364 that "There are approximately 2,511 nominal records currently held within the NDEDIU, which are subject to continuous review with the view to deleting any records which bear no relevance to our policing purposes." Please confirm what information is held by NDEDIU on an individual's 'nominal record'.

• Reference: 2014/2748
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

The Metropolitan Police has previously confirmed in response to question 2014/2364 that 'There are approximately 2,511 nominal records currently held within the NDEDIU, which are subject to continuous review with the view to deleting any records which bear no relevance to our policing purposes.' Please provide the working definition of 'nominal records' used by the NDEDIU and confirm from where this definition is derived?

• Reference: 2014/2747
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

Thank you for your answer to my questions 2014/2361, 2014/2362 and 2014/2363. Please could you specify which section of the Data Protection Act 1998 prevents you from providing me with the information requested?

• Reference: 2014/2746
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

Thank you for your answer to my question 2014/2374. Please could you tell me how many Metropolitan Police databases are able to be amended, or have data entered onto them, by people outside the police or security services?

• Reference: 2014/2745
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

Thank you for your answer to my question 2014/2366. Could you provide me with the number of Metropolitan Police Service employees who have reported wrongdoing under the 'MPS Reporting of Wrongdoing Policy', in the last four years, broken down by year?

• Reference: 2014/2744
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

Thank you for your answer to my question 2014/2366. Could you therefore confirm that there are no Metropolitan Police Service officers or staff who have exposed wrongdoing within the Metropolitan Police whose name is known publicly and is happy with the outcome of their action and how they were treated during the process?

• Reference: 2014/2743
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

Following the findings on an employment tribunal that Metropolitan Police officer Carol Howard was discriminated against by her senior officer could you let me know what action will be taken against inspector Dave Kelly?

• Reference: 2014/2742
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

The employment tribunal into the case of Metropolitan Police officer Carol Howard stated they were "very concerned that the Respondent's policy of not allowing Fairness at Work advisors to make assessments of discrimination and of instructing to delete them when they do so might mislead complainants and tribunals into believing the FAW Advisor has not found any discrimination when in fact he or she has done so." Please could you let me know when this policy was implemented, at what level it was agreed, and review all complaints of discrimination made during that period to assess if any were affected...

• Reference: 2014/2741
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 23 July 2014

It appears from your answers to my questions 2014/0100, 2014/1418 and 2014/0673 that you are not willing to investigate the failings of the criminal justice system to provide justice for the victims of road crime, even when one of those victims is a serving police officer. Given your recent statements linking the decline of road casualties with better enforcement by the police, do you think it is time to review the role of the criminal justice system in helping to deliver safer roads in London?