Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Transport for London - energy procurement

  • Reference: 2017/2189
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
Given that Transport for London (TfL) is the biggest energy consumer in London and one of the top 10 electricity consumers in the UK, will you use this procurement opportunity to accelerate the decarbonisation process of the power sector, setting zero carbon energy targets in line with the Paris Climate Change agreement?

President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Change agreement

  • Reference: 2017/2188
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
President Trump's decision to abandon the Paris Climate Change agreement means that, in order to avoid catastrophic climate change, other nations and global cities like London will have to significantly intensify their efforts to decarbonise and accelerate zero carbon energy generation. What impact will this decision have on your overall carbon reduction target? Will you be revising it to ensure it is still consistent with the Paris agreement in this new context?

Cleaner vehicle checker

  • Reference: 2017/2187
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
I welcome the announcement of your 'cleaner vehicles check' scheme to provide the public with independent test results of all new vehicles based on 'real-world driving emissions'. Will you look at the feasibility of using this for setting a ULEZ standard for diesel vehicles, so that Euro 6 diesel models found to be significantly over the emissions specified by manufacturers are charged the same as other non-compliant vehicles?

National Policy Statement - third runway at Heathrow

  • Reference: 2017/2186
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
The Government recently consulted on its preferred option for a third runway at Heathrow in its 'Draft Airports National Policy Statement'. If the third runway goes ahead, what is your assessment of the impact on the date London will achieve pollution limit compliance?

Engine Idling

  • Reference: 2017/2185
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
A constituent has informed me that in Brighton, taxis have stickers asking people to refrain from idling. As part of your anti-engine idling campaign and spreading the message wider, will you encourage the taxi trade to adopt a similar approach and include stickers on the back of all buses?

Draft national air pollution plans - Clean Air Act

  • Reference: 2017/2184
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
The Government's draft air quality plans failed to include proposals for a Clean Air Act. What are the implications for your plans to clean up London's air?

Draft UK air quality plan - diesel scrappage fund

  • Reference: 2017/2183
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
The Government air quality plan has no firm commitment for a diesel scrappage scheme. What implications will this have for your plans to clean up London's air?

Draft UK air quality plan - Vehicle Excise Duty

  • Reference: 2017/2182
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
The Government's draft air quality plans failed to include proposals for reforming Vehicle Excise Duty, so that rates reflect local pollutants such as NOx, NO2 and PMs, as well as CO2. What implications will this have for your plans to clean up London's air?

Draft UK air quality plan "woefully inadequate"

  • Reference: 2017/2181
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
You described the Government's draft air quality plan as "woefully inadequate" and stated that "City Hall analysis shows that the proposals will mean air quality will be at illegal levels until at least 2026". Do you agree that the current proposals will fall short of the High Court requirement that nitrogen dioxide (N02) limit values are met, and exposure to air pollution reduced within the shortest time possible?

Security barriers on London bridges

  • Reference: 2017/2180
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 22 June 2017
On 7 June 2017 a Transport for London (TfL) spokesperson informed cycle campaigners: "The Met has installed barriers to increase security on London's busiest bridges. We are working with them to ensure that these barriers affect cyclists as little as possible, while ensuring the security of all road users." Please explain how cyclists' concerns around crush risk and loss of cycle lane space associated with these barriers have now been addressed by TfL and the Metropolitan Police Service?
Subscribe to