• Reference: 2018/2375
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

I understand that Sutton Police Station is a PFI building and this is due to end in 2029. What preparations are taking place ahead of this?

• Reference: 2018/2374
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

What is the state of play with regard to the strategic review of bus routes in Sutton and Croydon?

• Reference: 2018/2373
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

The 412 now has to turn right coming out of Christchurch Rd, onto Brighton Rd at the traffic lights. For a double decker bus to have to turn right at the junction with a pedestrian traffic island, will cause even more hold ups for vehicles behind, who will be caught in this stacking process. It will also make it difficult for traffic coming in the opposite direction, out of Christchurch Rd (south eastern end) from turning right as well. This means that in theory the traffic should go behind the bus to turn right. The lights are phased to operate...

• Reference: 2018/2372
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

In both the morning and afternoon peak, Pampisford Rd, traffic going north at the junction with Christchurch Rd, is always stacking back onto Pampisford Rd with traffic held by the very short phasing period of time for the traffic lights on Brighton Rd. If, as I suspect, my constituents suffer excessive delays for the 412 at peak times, will Transport for London reconsider their changes?

• Reference: 2018/2371
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

The 412 bus route saw a significant reduction to its timetable on 1 September 2018. Are you happy that the consultation was well-run, well-publicised and fair?

• Reference: 2018/2369
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

In light of the recent announcement that the opening of the Elizabeth Line has a 9 month delay, what is Transport for London's new budget profile for Crossrail, including projected revenues?

• Reference: 2018/2368
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

In response to Question 2018/1966, you promised that a "briefing note will be published on the Transport for London website, once it has been provided to Board Members." Is the 24 July Board Briefing Note now found on the TfL Website (http://content.tfl.gov.uk/24-july-2018-board-briefing-note%20-on-fatigu…) the briefing note you were referring to?

• Reference: 2018/2367
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

A recent Private Eye article mentions a 'TfL Board Report' which revealed that TfL Buses had "7000 road traffic collisions, 1600 injuries, 400 people sent to hospital and 200 killed or seriously injured (KSI) every quarter" and "the trends have not been going in the right direction for years: not injuries, not collisions, not slips trips and falls, not hospitalisations, not KSIs, not deaths." Please provide me with a copy of this Board Report.

• Reference: 2018/2366
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

Recommendation 12 of the RAIB's Croydon Crash Investigation stated, inter alia, that the Tram Operator should (a) improve management systems to ensure that safety issues are properly identified from any reports, whether from staff or members of the public and appropriate and timely actions are taken in response; and (b) develop improved processes to ensure that suitable lessons are learned from such reports and that outcomes are fed back to the reporter." In what way does your response to Question 2018/1356 show that the Recommendation has been accepted and is being applied to TfL's Bus Operators?

• Reference: 2018/2365
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 September 2018

Your response to Question 2017/2109 revealed that Transport for London (TfL) Bus Operators retain CCTV evidence "between four and ten days depending on the type of bus and hard drive installed." Since Bus Operators own and operate the CCTV systems on Buses, do you accept that the current Public Reporting System for Surface Transport Safety Incidents run by TfL and which you advocate in Question 2018/1356 allows for a lot of safety incident evidence to be destroyed by TfL's contracted Surface Transport Operators? Is this intentional?