• Reference: 2019/12344
• Question by: Susan Hall
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

Presenting the data by year since 2015/16 and crime type, please provide a breakdown of the number of crimes committed at bus stops?

• Reference: 2019/12342
• Question by: Susan Hall
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

How is the taxi trade represented on the Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Taskforce?

• Reference: 2019/12341
• Question by: Susan Hall
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

Please provide the Assembly with the full list of members of your Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Taskforce.

• Reference: 2019/12339
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

For each of the years 2016/17, 2017/18 and 2018/19, how many crimes have been committed on buses in Sutton by crime type?

• Reference: 2019/12338
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

For each of the years 2016/17, 2017/18 and 2018/19, how many crimes have been committed on buses in Croydon by crime type?

• Reference: 2019/12336
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

For each of the years 2016/17, 2017/18 and 2018/19, how many crimes have been committed on Trams in Croydon by crime type?

• Reference: 2019/12335
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

Your response to Question 2019/8979 related to the Density Matrix but did not indicate how Policy D6 would meet the requirements of NPPF Plan Making Para 16 which states: Plans should: b) be prepared positively, in a way that is aspirational but deliverable; c) be shaped by early, proportionate and effective engagement between plan-makers and communities, local organisations, businesses, infrastructure providers and operators and statutory consultees; d) contain policies that are clearly written and unambiguous, so it is evident how a decision maker should react to development proposals; Would you agree that Policy D6 does not meet NPPF Para 16...

• Reference: 2019/12334
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

Your answer to Question 2019/8978 described the ways of measuring transport connectivity using the TfL WebCAT PTAL and TIM but the answer did not clarify how PTAL and TIM could be used to implement Policy D6 or how these parameters could be used to interpret the appropriate densities of a proposed development. How should the WebCAT PTAL and TIM parameters be used to determine the acceptability or otherwise of an individual development proposal without some form of detailed guidance or methodology once the Density Matrix has been removed?

• Reference: 2019/12333
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

Your answer to Question 2019/8977 indicated “The draft Plan requires development proposals to provide a range of measures of density that are more useful than the current single density measure monitored…” These consist of Policy D6: Policy D6 paragraph D states: The following measurements of density should be provided for all planning applications that include new residential units: 1) number of units per hectare 2) number of habitable rooms per hectare 3) number of bedrooms per hectare 4) number of beds-paces per hectare. What is the methodology to analyse the acceptability or otherwise of these parameters for a specific development...

• Reference: 2019/12332
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 20 June 2019

The policies in your draft London Plan do not set out a clear and systematic approach to assess development proposals that reflect site specific circumstances. Your answer to Question 2019/8976 indicated that you are preparing detailed Supplementary Planning Guidance to accompany the Plan that will provide additional detail on how to effectively optimise the capacity of sites by following the design-led-approach. If that is the case does it not prove that Policy D6: 1 Does not meet the requirements of NPPF para 16 d); 2 If the Supplementary Planning Guidance is not published at the same time as the New...