• Reference: 2020/0354
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 24 February 2020

On TfL’s bus data page why does the bus safety data release only include data from Quarter 1 in 2015? When will 2014’s Quarterly data be added to this data set?

• Reference: 2020/0353
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 24 February 2020

In response to Question 2020/0012 TfL has published bus safety data for Quarter 2 and Quarter 3, but the new data is in an entirely different format and lacks the granularity of the previous 21 Quarters of published data. How is removing the name of the bus operator involved, the Borough in which it took place, the bus route and a host of important details about the victim and the mode of transport an “upgrade” that improves ”timeliness and accuracy in the long term”? When will TfL replace the Q2 and Q3 Quarterly data with data with the same format...

• Reference: 2020/0352
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 24 February 2020

In the documents contained in your delayed response to Question 2019/8811 there is a minute (page 83) which indicates Fatigue Audit IA 17780 was never approved by Tram Operations Limited. How is it possible that a TfL contractor which has been involved a catastrophic incident involving fatigued driving can refuse to approve a TfL Internal Audit which found that improvements on fatigue management were urgent and necessary?

• Reference: 2020/0351
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 24 February 2020

A year ago in response to Question 2019/2084 you stated “London’s bus network is the most heavily monitored in the UK with respect to driver hours and I am satisfied that London bus drivers are not working excessively long hours.” Given the findings of the Loughborough University Report published in August 2019 and Unite the Union’s Consultative Ballot about Fatigue held on 7 Feb 2020, are you “still satisfied that London Bus Drivers are not working excessively long hours”? If so, please provide evidence to support your statement.

• Reference: 2020/0350
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 24 February 2020

According to Department for Transport statistics published on the 22 January 2020 the number of local bus passenger journeys in England was 4.30 billion in the year ending September 2019, a 0.4% decrease when compared with a year earlier. However, in London bus use decreased by 0.8% in the latest year. What are the reasons for the fall in bus usage being faster in London than the rest of England?

• Reference: 2020/0349
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 24 February 2020

What is TfL’s estimate of the required increase in bus usage that would be required to ensure that your Transport Strategy objective is met of 80 per cent of journeys being made by active transport or public transport by 2041?

• Reference: 2020/0348
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 24 February 2020

Further to data provided in response to Question 2019/4021 please provide the most recent data for both the total number and proportion of jobs in Greater London paying less than the London Living Wage.

• Reference: 2020/0347
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 24 February 2020

Please set out the evidence in relation to each of the eight wharves that have seen their safeguarding directions removed in Mayoral Decision 2569 and set out how this decision fully complies with Policy S1 15 of the draft London and 7.26 of the current London Plan, which requires safeguarded wharves to be used for the purposes of waterborne freight handling, with any redevelopment for other land only being acceptable when the wharf is no long viable or capable of being made viable for waterborne freight handling.

• Reference: 2020/0041
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

How will you reduce the amount of waste London generates?

• Reference: 2020/0171
• Question by: Leonie Cooper
• Meeting date: 16 January 2020

What would have been the impact on Londoners’ health if the ULEZ was brought in as originally planned in 2020?