Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [15]

  • Question by: Sally Hamwee
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
You mentioned in your introduction the balance between traditional officers and PCSOs. You didn't mention the balance between uniformed officers and PCSOs and civilians and that's been another debate which has been going on. At the same MQT you said, on the question of civilianisation, 'It would be absolutely mad for me to announce what we're doing before we've had the debate about that and developed the sophisticated techniques we want to see' I understand that the budget reflects the proportion of civilian staff to uniformed officers, which has been traditional - Ian Blair is nodding so I think we...

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [14]

  • Question by: Sally Hamwee
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
: I would have more confidence - and I don't need a publicity campaign telling me about police on the streets because it's part of the plan - if I thought that, knowing that money is bound to be limited, however much we all want to spend on the police, to be committed to the budget going, perhaps disproportionately to policing numbers, at the very time when the MPS is identifying how many more bangs for the bucks could be achieved by a different approach, doesn't seem to me to be necessary or a proper approach. I have to say...

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [13]

  • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
In your explanation about rises in TfL budgets and the need for more money - something I can subscribe to; we all need more money - would you not acknowledge that, in terms of the increases that you have had from central Government grant - I sometimes wonder whether you acknowledge this - of 17.8% increase this year in Government grant, with 47.3% increase last year, combined with everything else, do you not think that in terms of some of the cases that you make, some of the arguments you put forward could be much better, and you can acknowledge...

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [12]

  • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
So, in essence, the next Transport Strategy will have business cases and finance alongside it, this time integrated. Is that what you're saying?

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [11]

  • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
You alluded to, earlier on, some of the longer terms problems that you have in the budget. Can you tell us where the board are on in urging you to bring forward proposals to tackle some of those problems?

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [10]

  • Question by: Brian Coleman
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
You refer to the A13 scheme and the Coulsdon Relief Road which you have inherited and which you are proceeding with and budgeting for, can I suggest that you have failed to adequately budget for another scheme which you inherited which is the North Circular Road and which you cavalierly disregarded and, instead, come up with another scheme which is totally inadequate and very unpopular? You justified the A13 and the Coulsdon relief road on the grounds that there is a large amount of public support for them. There is a large amount of public support in the boroughs of...

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [9]

  • Question by: Angie Bray
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
I wonder if you could just remind me what the advertising spend is going to be for the congestion charge scheme?

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [8]

  • Question by: Brian Coleman
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
And necessary for the economic life of north London.

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [7]

  • Question by: Brian Coleman
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
Only because you quote a different sum every time you talk about the North Circular Road. It's instant inflation we seem to have had from TfL.

Statement by the Mayor (Supplementary) [6]

  • Question by: Brian Coleman
  • Meeting date: 22 January 2003
That's utter tosh, Mr Mayor, as you know, because there is a scheme, for example for Henlys Corner, which has been through an extensive and expensive public enquiry and for which traffic orders have been issued, which you are now proposing to abandon in favour of a scheme which is costing a considerable sum of public money which will not improve the situation whatsoever but still spends over £50 million of public money.
Subscribe to