Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [26]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
There is an echo of surprise, I think, around London that the man who delivered this single most successful policy for you, is out the door before the ink is even dry on it.

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [25]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
I am unclear about this consultancy role. It seems to me that it is a lot of spin to address the fact that fundamentally he has lost confidence in the senior management of TfL and they in him and they have parted their ways. If he is a consultant, how is he being appointed; what are the terms of that; will he still be in charge or will he not be in charge of the congestion charge?

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [24]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
Is he leaving or is he not leaving?

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [23]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
Half of 1%?

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [22]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
Mr Mayor, your Report this time tells us that the set up costs for the appeals service for the congestion charge are £423,000 and the estimated annual running costs will be £700,000, which seems like a lot of money. Before the charge was introduced, on 4 February this year at the Transport Committee, my friend and colleague, Lynne Featherstone, asked TfL what estimate they had of the number of appeals that there would be. Malcolm Murray Clark, who was the Project Manager for the congestion charge, stated that half of 1% of appeals for bus lanes were successful and that...

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [21]

  • Question by: Angie Bray
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
But if he wished to come as part of that meeting, you would be happy that he should attend?

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [20]

  • Question by: Angie Bray
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
On a more serious note, you've been talking earlier about the money that you are hoping is going to accrue to Londoners as a result of selling the policy elsewhere. Can I refer you to some people who are very concerned about money that's flowing out of their pockets? I know that you have had a letter from the Chief Executive of the Macmillan Cancer Relief - I think we have all had copies of that letter; I certainly have - and he has obviously brought to your attention some serious problems being faced by people undergoing regular treatment for...

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [19]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
It's round the world?

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [18]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
I am just intrigued about this company that Derek Turner is setting up that you're buying shares in. This `close, personal friend', as you call him: I seem to remember you in another place criticising senior civil servants who left there and then suddenly ended up with consultancies with Government. What is the actual situation here? Isn't it going to look a little odd to Londoners?

Update to Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [17]

  • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
Most people who travel on the Tube between 8.00am and 9.00am would say that current levels are unacceptable anyway.
Subscribe to