• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

Well those planning consents have been implemented, Neale, then. They cannot possibly be in the pipeline if they are already being built, can they?

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

So, that is not a mark of success is it, by any measure?

• Question by: Bob Blackman
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

Two quick areas I would just like to raise: how are you going to address the need for new affordable housing for families when we have already got a surplus of one bedroom properties at affordable level, and a large element of the developments that have taken place have been two bedroom properties? In actual fact the demand now in London is very much for family housing, both for affordable housing for rent but also housing that can be bought by families.

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

We are not claiming anything of the sort. What we are saying is that it has got nothing whatsoever to do with the Mayor. It is a fact, isn't it, that the majority of borough councils in London do not subscribe to the Mayor's targets, and indeed those boroughs which have subscribed to the Mayor's targets have, in quantum, produced infinitely fewer houses than they were forecast to build? In effect, therefore, there has been a smaller cake and the only way they have been able to achieve the target is to get 50% of the smaller cake, whereas in...

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

Well, 5,300. To get anywhere near beating that target he should be producing 20,000, so you are already setting yourself up to fail.

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

Would you care to answer the point that I made to you about the Thames Gateway, which is proposed to be the principal site for new homes in London. This suggests that there are going to be 100,000 new houses built on Thames Gateway - this is on page 27 [of the Mayor's Draft Housing Strategy]. However, in July the Mayor told me that there were only going to be 40,000 new homes.

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

No, no, no. I was asking you specifically about the Thames Gateway, which of course is the Mayor's flagship. Whenever he is asked where the new housing is going to be built, he says it is going to be built in the Thames Gateway. You have just told us you have been very encouraged that there are 4,000 new starts.

• Question by: Murad Qureshi
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

Can I just go back to Neale's comments. I am glad to hear that local authorities are looking at areas where there is already the social infrastructure to provide additional housing. It strikes me, though, that the last time the capacity study was done at the GLA, during the first term, the local authorities in the south-west, where there is the infrastructure, the roads and what have you, got off lightly. I am talking about Richmond upon Thames and Kingston upon Thames. It seems to me, when I go through those parts of town, the infrastructure is there to accommodate...

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

So there is double counting?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 24 October 2007

Finally, can I take if from what you said that the Mayor will continue to oppose any nationalisation, in effect, of the Section 106 legal agreement monies through a national Planning Gain Supplement (PGS).