• Question by: Krupesh Hirani
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Krupesh Hirani AM: To really target the Mayor on this particular issue as well, given the track record of the Government over the last decade of austerity and the impact on disabled people, we have had the changes to the Employment Support Allowance and changes to the disability benefits from the Disability Living Allowance to Personal Independence Payments, which have left disabled people without support despite not seeing any changes in their circumstances. Also, we have seen people being declared fit for work despite being on their deathbeds, and the changes to social care and the cuts to the NHS...

• Question by: Lord Bailey of Paddington
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Shaun Bailey AM: Good morning, Mr Mayor. In your manifesto, you pledged to increase the number of employers accredited to the Good Work Standard. The number of employers is very low. When will we see an ambition to raise this? How are you going to go about raising the number of employers who are signed up to this scheme?

• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Elly Baker AM: Mr Mayor, your submission to the October 2020 spending review included the creation of a national £1.5 billion clean air fund to enable cities to fairly implement clean air zones and tackle emissions, including through vehicle scrappage and retrofit schemes. In terms of funding for London, it is proposed that this should at the very least match the existing £52 million scrappage scheme in the capital. What response have you received from the Government on this, and would it be better for the funding to come from central government instead of using the GLA’s business rate reserves?

• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Elly Baker AM: Mr Mayor, the Secretary of State for Transport has said that TfL’s January 2021 Financial Sustainability Plan does not appear to engage with the majority of the recommendations made in the TfL independent review. Can I ask you about the Government’s engagement? The review says, “We do not recommend significant service reductions”, so why is the Government forcing TfL to conduct a review that requires TfL to be in a position to reduce service levels?

• Question by: Leonie Cooper
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Léonie Cooper AM: Mr Mayor, thank you very much for your answer to Assembly Member Duvall. I am still very unclear, though, as to the position of the Conservative Members, Assembly Member Prince and Assembly Member Fortune. You mentioned Government support and they replied with some nonsense about small amounts from business rates, which would just go towards the TfL deficit, as you described. It is actually not really Government support, though, is it? Londoners pay £500 million a year in Vehicle Excise Duty (VED). I am very surprised that Assembly Member Prince, as their transport spokesperson, allegedly, does not...

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Len Duvall AM: Mr Mayor, I get more and more confused whenever Assembly Member Keith Prince, the Tory transport spokesman ‑‑ Keith Prince AM (Deputy Chair): I am not a Tory. Len Duvall AM: ‑‑ speaks about issues on transport and the issues relating to the ULEZ or even issues relating to the Government’s deal. On the ULEZ, I think it was the Member to my side who said, “History will come to be told by those who are on the side of the ULEZ”. I am still confused about whether the Conservatives support ULEZ in its form as a...

• Question by: Sakina Sheikh
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Sakina Sheikh AM: I just wanted to come in on another aspect around regeneration and development that is relevant to Assembly Member Best’s question. Just this weekend, for instance, we saw a number of Conservative backbenchers express real concerns around the Government’s planning reforms, which speaks to Assembly Member Best’s concern around protecting local boroughs’ decision-making powers with regard to this. We saw London MP Bob Blackman has urged the Prime Minister to ditch the proposals, saying growth zones will be like the Wild West for the developers, and the proposals are not popular with the public, either. We know...

• Question by: Emma Best
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Emma Best AM: Just to come back there, Assembly Member Ahmad raises a very important point of funding. In the years 2019 to 2020, the funding for early years expenditure was £450,347. For the years 2020 to 2021, it is £233,658. I am sure you can accept that that is quite a drop there. My questions, really ‑ and perhaps in the interest of time you could answer them both at the same time ‑ are: will you commit to not decreasing that fund any more, and would you consider things like your Press Office may be less important than...

• Question by: Marina Ahmad
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Marina Ahmad AM: Mr Mayor, as you know, the Government’s own adviser, [Sir] Kevan Collins, who was the education recovery czar and, as you know, resigned his post because he was so appalled at the paltry provision made by the Government for a post-pandemic education recovery for our children. [Sir] Kevan Collins understood that a child’s life chances are best served by investment in her or his early years, as you do, Mr Mayor. In his letter of resignation he singled out early years education as needing further investment and I quote directly, “Not enough is being done” by Government...

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 24 June 2021

Len Duvall AM: This is an extremely complex area, Mr Mayor. One of the tests of smell is what they tell police officers to do when they stop cars for the issue of moving towards breathalysation, which is the smell of alcohol. There is increasing concern about driving under the influence of drugs. What I want to avoid and I think you want to avoid is mixed messages. Even the Assembly Member for the Greens would accept that driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs is an important issue. If I was a young police officer who stopped a...