ADD2316 SfL Capital Fund Technical Building Due Diligence

£114million Growth Deal funding (provides funding to local enterprise partnerships; partnerships between local authorities and businesses) has been made available for investment in the estate and equipment of skills providers over the period 2017/18 to 2020/21 through the Skills for Londoners Capital Fund (the Fund). This funding has been awarded to the London Economic Action Partnership (LEAP) to deliver a programme of capital expenditure on infrastructure which will support the facilitation of delivery of skills services in London and does not amount to the funding of education services. The main capital Fund has been broken down into rounds allocating £25.7million of the £47million available in the first tranche of funding. A second funding round was launched in summer this year with a refreshed prospectus and developed to align with priorities emerging from the new London Skills Strategy. Stage 1 of this round has been completed and 29 projects have been invited to Stage 2 to submit a detailed application totalling £142m. From experience, we know that projects fall away and/or de-scope in size and so have overprogrammed for this stage.

The Fund programme is the next iteration of, and builds on thesuccesses and lessons learned from, the Further Education Capital Fund programme. Both programmes capture Growth Deal funding allocations from Central Government for capital investment in vocational skills projects. As such, the Fund Round 1 continued to utilise the technical due diligence services procured in February 2015 under DD1307. The contracts have since expired in August 2018 and thus for Skills for Londoners R2 we are working with TfL to single source procure the same contractors to carry out the due diligence on the shortlisted projects at Stage 2 of R2 SfL to ensure consistency and fairness for the Fund programme.

A new budget of up to £50,000 is now required for the Skills for Londoners Capital Fund Round 2 assessment process.

Funds, provided by Government, are capital only and, as such, there is a revenue requirement to support delivery of the programme. MD 2142 approved a process of swapping up to 10% of the Growth Deal capital funding receipt for revenue funding. The total capital to revenue swap as described in MD2142 amounts to £5m and a total of £300,000 of this amount has been profiled for technical due diligence support in assessing applications to the Fund programme. Within the £300,000, a total of up to £100,000 was programmed for spend on technical due diligence in 2017/18. £50,000 is now being requested to spend on the building technical due diligence required for the shortlisted stage 2 Fund Round 2 projects.

The provider of the building technical due diligence has provided an estimate of £30,650 (excluding VAT) to complete the due diligence services on up to twelve Fund applications (including Mayors Construction Academy (MCA) projects and combined SfL and MCA projects). This ADD seeks approval for up to £50,000 to allow for any unforeseen costs in completing the assessments for Round 2 of the Fund. WSP is being contracted via a single source procurement process as consistency is key in ensuring that all applicants are given a fair chance when being appraised for funding. It would not be fair to change the due diligence consultant at this stage in the funding programme. Once this round of funding is completed and the funding programme concludes, the LEAP Delivery Team will carry out a competitive procurement process for any future funding which may become available from Central Government.

The building surveyor provides the GLA (for individual project applications which have been shortlisted to receive LEAP funding) an appraisal of building/property issues including technical, legal, environmental, building regulation and restoration matter. This will enable the GLA to provide adequate assurance that proposed projects are deliverable and to inform the decision made by the GLA and LEAP to fund these projects.

Under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010, in making these decisions “due regard” must be had to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation as well as to advance equality of opportunity and foster good relations between people who have a protected characteristic and those who do not. Protected characteristics include age, disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, gender, sexual orientation (and marriage or civil partnership status for the purpose of the duty to eliminate unlawful discrimination only). This duty has been taken into account, but no additional equality impact assessments are required beyond those considered in the relevant planning documentation for the Mayor to make these decisions.

The Skills for Londoners Capital Fund seeks to address issues of modernisation and rationalisation of further education and skills providers’ estate. In doing so, specific equality benefits include;

• Increase in accessibility of college estate (measured in m²);

• Increase in opportunity for learners with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities to be engaged and retained in vocational and academic study;

• Increase in course provision, enabling more learners per annum; and

• Increase in apprenticeships and traineeships, allowing students from deprived areas an economic incentive when obtaining a qualification.

The original contracts were procured using a fair and competitive process. The received bids were evaluated by three independent Officers. As mentioned previously, the original contracts expired in August 2018 and to ensure a fair and consistent due diligence approach is maintained across the Skills for Londoners Capital fund programme, a single source tender procurement process is being carried out for the two consultants. This procurement is not expected to demonstrate an effect on equality requirements.

Risks around projects which are not deliverable. There is a risk that without the technical due diligence advice, proposed projects would not be affordable or deliverable. Any queries resulting from due diligence will be raised with the project and a resolution or mitigation will be required before the project is offered funding and / or before a funding agreement is entered with the delivery partner.

There is a risk that using a single source procurement process will be challenged, however we are confident of our rationale in ensuring that the programme is fair and consistent. We also commit to run a competitive procurement process for any future funding streams.

In the event of a conflict of interest, i.e. the consultant is acting for both the GLA and a funding recipient on a current project, the consultant is required to advise GLA of the details in writing and propose suitable and acceptable measures to ensure objectivity and non-collusion. We also reserve the right to not instruct them in certain circumstances if we feel it’s necessary.

There is a risk that single sourcing is not successful, and the original consultants do not wish to continue their work with the GLA. To mitigate against this risk, a GLA Officer has liaised with the consultants to gain confirmation of their interest.

The cost of up to £50,000 for this proposal will be funded from within the £5m revenue funding earmarked for the Skills for Londoners Programme as per MD2142. As noted within the main body of this report, £300,000 of the £5m revenue funding for this programme has been allocated towards due diligence costs that arise during the duration of the programme.

The decisions requested of the Assistant Director (in accordance with the GLA’s Contracts and Funding Code) concern the exercise of the GLA’s general powers, falling within the GLA’s statutory powers to do such things considered to further or which are facilitative of, conducive or incidental to the promotion of economic development and wealth creation, social development or the promotion of the improvement of the environment in Greater London; and in formulating the proposals in respect of which a decision is sought officers have complied with the Authority’s related statutory duties to:

• Pay due regard to the principle that there should be equality of opportunity for all people;

• Consider how the proposals will promote the improvement of health of persons, health inequalities between persons and to contribute towards the achievement of sustainable development in the United Kingdom; and

• Consult with appropriate bodies.

In taking the decisions requested, the Director must have due regard to the Public Sector Equality Duty; namely the need to eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other conduct prohibited by the Equality Act 2010 and to advance equality of opportunity and foster good relations between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic (race, disability, gender, age, sexual orientation, religion or belief, pregnancy and maternity and gender reassignment) and persons who do not share it (section 149 of the Equality Act 2010). To this end, the Director should have particular regard to section 3 (above) of this report.

Officers should ensure that the services be procured by Transport for London Procurement who will determine the detail of the procurement strategy to be adopted in accordance with the GLA’s Contracts and Funding Code. Officers must ensure that appropriate contract documentation is put in place and executed by the successful bidder(s) and the GLA before the commencement of the services.

Section 4.1 of the Contracts and Funding Code (the ‘Code’) requires the GLA to Seek a call-off from a suitable framework, where possible, or if not, undertake a formal tender process which will be managed by TfL in respect of the services. However, the director may approve an exemption from this requirement under section 5 of the Code upon certain specified grounds. One of those grounds is that there is the continuation of services. Officers have indicated at paragraph 1.5 of this report that this ground applies and that the proposed contracts affords value for money.

On this basis the director may approve the proposed exemption if satisfied with the content of this report.

The building due diligence services will be procured via TfL using a single source tender process and the services required will be appropriate to the scale, complexity and risk associated with each project. The procurement of the original contracts was approved in DD1307.

WSP will be single sourced to carry out the building technical due diligence and will sub contract this work, as done previously, to Currie Brown.