Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation 1

Question by

Status

Year

  • Priorities for the Coming Year (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    OK, and the final thing; I know I threw so many questions at you, but will the targeted offer be distributed to small groups with multiple needs?

  • Priorities for the Coming Year (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    My key concern is that it is not a scattergun approach that it goes to a lot of schemes but that it is targeted on very specific small schemes where it can actually do some good. Thank you.

  • London Youth Offer (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    I have a couple of specific questions; maybe I will cover them all together. First of all, is it just going to be for two years and will you ensure that the additional money will go to those schemes, many of which are working very successfully, rather than try to reinvent the wheel with trying to identify other schemes? Will young people decide how the offer money is going to be spent, and can you confirm that the targeted offer will be distributed to small groups with multiple needs?

  • London Youth Offer

    • Reference: 2007/0044-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Who is going to benefit from the 'London Youth Offer' announced on 20th September 2008?

  • Transport Safer Neighbourhood Teams (2) (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    I take the point, wholly, that the train operating companies should be paying for their policing. Historically they do not. I do not think the public is going to be much impressed by this turf war.

  • Complexity of Police Panels and Committees (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    I wholly agree that this is best served to get sorted out pragmatically and at borough level, but can I suggest that it might be helpful, if it is not already happening, for the MPA to take the lead in discussion with what used to be the ALG, London Councils, as I think it is now, to try and start some thinking about how to rationalise what is becoming an increasingly complex consultative structure with often the same people going to lots of meetings saying exactly the same thing.

  • Brownfield Land (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    You anticipated my next question which was, if we count the Olympics towards that target, so the real issue, as it were, is for non-Olympic area target for the rest of London that we need to highlight and make sure that that is sufficiently ambitious to give us the brownfield site to protect the greenfield and then green belt.

  • London Fashion Week (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    That is now up for renewal if it is the end of the three years so this is an ideal time for you to withhold grants.

  • London Fashion Week (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    And Madrid, yes.

  • London Fashion Week (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    Per year, or over the three years?