Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • Climate Change (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    What about enforcement?
  • Climate Change (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Could I stop you there. I have got some questions and not very much time. Perhaps I can ask all my questions then you can just answer as best you can. The first question is how are you going to enforce all this, because that always seems to be the problem with councils actually being able to enforce codes. My view on all this, about trying to get to Level 3, is that it is just utterly unambitious. If you think that the houses we build now are going to be here for at least 50 years and possibly 100...
  • Climate Change (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Can I just pursue this point, to agree with Jenny's point - the fuel poverty point - that by focusing on the affordable housing you get an added social benefit, but the Strategy focuses on the larger strategic developments. Isn't there a lot more that we can be doing given that I think the statistic is that 98% of all residential completions in the last year for which figures were available, were fewer than 100. By focusing on the larger ones we are missing the greater number. Are you satisfied that enough is going on to get the standards up...
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Before we move on to the next question I wonder if I could just ask you this: you have referred, Neale and David, to the relatively short time period covered by the Strategy. Leaving aside issues of the outcomes of elections and so on, what is anticipated in terms of roll forward of the Strategy, revision after it has been adopted and when a new one would come, or a revised one would come, onto the stocks to take us beyond 2011?
  • Use of Statistics (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    The problem is when the Chair of the Federation is saying what he says, which is so seriously strong when he says that it is being reported it is far below what really happens, underplayed for political reasons, you can play with statistics in that sense and the public does not feel that we have gotten on top of it. I think that independent statistics surely are the answer.
  • Transport Safer Neighbourhood Teams (2) (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    I take the point, wholly, that the train operating companies should be paying for their policing. Historically they do not. I do not think the public is going to be much impressed by this turf war.
  • Use of Statistics (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    It was suggested to me that this had been requested by TfL in order to collect figures on the congestion charge and people's journey times and choices.
  • Costs of Policing Heathrow (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Thank you for that answer. I freely admit this is a semi-planted question. The question is not planted but I received a briefing from the police several months ago precisely as part of the strategy which I think the Authority supports of seeking to reclaim funding for policing at London City Airport, and I quite strongly support that, it is a very profitable enterprise. As I understand it the figures are that currently policing at Heathrow costs roughly £48 million a year, of which we recover £26 million, and we want to increase that to £35 million. From the public...
  • Costs of Policing Heathrow (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    London City Airport; roughly we spend £7 million on policing - I think this is public information - and we are hoping to recover £5 million of that £7 million from them. That is not unreasonable.
  • Complexity of Police Panels and Committees (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Thank you, Chair. I think you have put your finger on it when you say partly a problem of transition. My experience has been that the public and the elected representatives of the public are not yet quite clear how the new system should be working, and there is perhaps some hanging on to old consultative contact structures that could really be burned back in order to save police time, because there is some concern about use of police time in the evenings if everybody was clear about how they could access the new consultative and dialogue framework. I would...