• Reference: 2022/4171
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

In your response to Question 2022/2688 you stated "Andy Lord, as Transport for London’s (TfL) Chief Operating Officer, is responsible for both the operation of the bus network and the management of the assets that support operations. The assets include toilet facilities provided to bus drivers.” Following your recent appointment of Mr. Lord to serve as Acting Commissioner of Transport, please can you provide me with the name of the TfL executive now responsible for this matter?

• Reference: 2022/4170
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

In your response to Question 2022/2682 you stated "Bus drivers on all routes in London have access to at least one toilet”; in your response to Question 2022/2683 you stated "Drivers on all bus routes in London have access to toilet facilities;” and in questions 2022/2684 and 2022/2687 you stated "Bus drivers on all routes in London have access to a toilet.” You might appreciate that the subtle differences in your responses undermine any clarity you might have intended to convey. Accordingly (and to avoid further confusion), can you confirm that your three different statements signify that Bus Drivers on...

• Reference: 2022/4169
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

Further to your response to Question 2022/2683, is the ‘recent’ RSSB Report to which you refer entitled "Guidance on the provision of employee toilet facilities on Great Britain’s railways” and published in March 2022?

• Reference: 2022/4168
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

Despite your lack of response to questions 2022/3472 and 2022/3473, please provide me with the independent “Human Factors” assessment of the criterion used to justify denying sufficient toilets to bus drivers on over 25% of London bus routes found in the ‘agreement' between TfL, the bus operators and Unite the Union to which you refer in your responses to questions 2022/2672, 2022/2678, 2022/2679, 2022/2680, 2022/2681 and 2022/2682.

• Reference: 2022/4167
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

In your response to Question 2022/2673, you refused “for commercial reasons” to publish the risk assessments for each of the 175 London bus routes that lack ‘Toilet Dignity for Bus Drivers’. Taking into account your, in my view, lack of transparency, can you at least confirm if the obvious risks to bus driver or passenger safety posed by the lack of toilets on these routes were considered in any of these 175 route risk assessments? If so, please identify the route numbers where lack of toilet dignity was considered and risk assessed.

• Reference: 2022/4166
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

What were the usage figures for the Elizabeth line for each day of October 2022?

• Reference: 2022/4165
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

Please produce a table showing Tube usage figures for every Tube Line for each day of October 2019 and October 2022 as well as the total usage for each day.

• Reference: 2022/4164
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

How many TfL staff worked on the ULEZ consultation? Please provide a breakdown by pay grade.

• Reference: 2022/4163
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

In relation to the independent third party being used to analyse every consultation response received for the ULEZ expansion, please disclose any correspondence with or documents created by or for them regarding the criteria that should be used to assess whether a response is “duplicate” or “not genuine.”

• Reference: 2022/4162
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 17 November 2022

In relation to the independent third party being used to analyse every consultation response received for the ULEZ expansion, please disclose: a) Their name b) Their contract c) The number of staff they have working on the consultation