• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

The promises you make to people: Park and Ride plan for London - proposal 4E14 in the Transport Strategy said you were going to publish a programme for Park and Ride in 2002. Have I missed it or did it get published?

• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

In the answer to Mike Tuffrey about policing you said you had no power. Won't that be a rather pusillanimous and weak explanation to give to the people of London at the next election? Isn't it really the case that in some ways your past historical baggage, in terms of being hard left, has left you unable, as Mayor, to exercise power over the Police Service to improve performance?

• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

In the Transport Strategy, proposal 40:14, you promised to complete a review of central London's disabled parking scheme by the end of 2002. Where is it?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

In a previous answer just before Christmas you said that London Remade were targeting to create 2,000 green jobs by March 2004. That's another 8,000 to find between March 2004 and May 2005. Do you think you'll make that?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

Do you think you will be on course to create 10,000 new jobs in green industries by 2005?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

What we're suggesting is that you would make the process much more transparent if people had access to you to put their case so that that is at least directly implanted from them into your head so that they can be aware that you've had their points in mind when you and you alone, as is entirely correct under the Act, go through the process of making the decision. That's how it's seen to be transparent, that both sides have full access.

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

In that event, why won't you be free with the people who object to planning applications as the Assembly, on a cross-party basis, suggested to you and give them accessibility so that you are seen to behave as - if you will forgive the old phrase - Caesar's wife in these matters, and there can't be any suspicion that the most important executive power you hold is exercised in anything other than a completely transparent open book fashion?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

I hope the question is not too specific. It has already been referred to: that is to say, your very specific commitment to - I think the full quote was - "To create the most open and transparent form of government that this country has yet seen" in this organisation. How do you reconcile that with a situation in which you tell us today that consultation is absorbed by your officers by what appears to be a process of osmosis; Members of the Assembly are told that they will be treated differentially according to whether they support the Mayor or...

• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

Excuse me, Ken, had Transport for London answered these questions that were put in a long time ago, in detail, in writing, I would not have to even bring them here and you are Chair of Transport for London.

• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

I think the issue of unaccompanied children is a pretty important detail.