Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [9]

  • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Jenette Arnold OBE (Deputy Chair): I have a couple of questions, one for Sir Eddie, and one for Victoria Hills. Sir Eddie, in your introduction you mentioned that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) master plan was similar to the blueprint adopted by the LLDC. I know, as one of the three Assembly Members for the area covered by the LLDC, and was heavily involved in the consultation and now I keep a very strong watching brief on what is going on, that many aspects of the LLDC’s vision has changed. For instance, the LLDC plan started...

Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [8]

  • Question by: Tom Copley
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Tom Copley AM: I wanted to return to the issue of affordable housing, because given the shortage of homes that we have this is something that is of particular interest to Londoners. Onkar Sahota has already called for a 50% target. You said that no borough at any point, you thought, had he ever managed to reach 50%, but surely it is better to aim high and fall short of that rather than aiming for 30% or 35% and ending up with 20% or 25%?

Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [7]

  • Question by: Nicky Gavron
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Nicky Gavron AM: Eddie, I would like to ask some questions about some of the planning aspects of this, however first of all I want to ask you about the legislative process, which I am extremely ignorant on. An order has to be laid before Parliament? When does that have to happen and what is in it?

Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [6]

  • Question by: Murad Qureshi
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Murad Qureshi AM: Can I raise two or three issues. The first one, Eddie, I am grateful that you mentioned the canals at the outset. It is just unfortunate they do not show up on the maps. I have no doubts that residential developers will be eying those canal sides very eagerly, because I suspect they can enhance the values of the developments by up to 40%. That is the residential side. However, I am more concerned that they are used during the works construction on the site. I think this is going to be a huge development site, over...

Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Stephen Knight
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Stephen Knight AM: Just one quick point and that is, is it legally possible to spend Section 106 or CIL money outside the boundary of a planning authority?

Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Darren Johnson AM: I hear what you say about Wormwood Scrubs and the issue of permeability. I do not at all doubt the need to improve permeability. However, surely, this type of thing can be done through sensible negotiations between boroughs. You do not need to include it in the MDC to ensure pathways and gates to public open space, do you?

Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Onkar Sahota
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Sir Edward, one of the things, which Ealing wanted, was that they wanted North Acton to be excluded from the MDC. They had an understanding ‑ or they felt they had an understanding from you ‑ that it would be excluded. Can you show us why it is that it has not been excluded and why they may have come to this understanding?

Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Navin Shah AM: Chair, the same issue: Wormwood Scrubs. The campaigners and Wormwood Scrubs Charitable Trust are aware of explanation given by the Mayor and the negotiations you had. We have a letter, the Assembly Members have a letter from yesterday from the Trust, who maintain that they still have grave concerns about the inclusion of the Scrubs in MDC area. Is the message now therefore from you that you are not prepared to budge to the campaigners?

Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Kit Malthouse
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Kit Malthouse AM: I just wanted to raise the issue of Wormwood Scrubs with you. You helpfully wrote to me yesterday ‑ following quite a lot of emails from alarmed residents of that area who have an interest in the Scrubs ‑ outlining the Mayor’s commitment to protecting it. However, could you just explain to us, if there are no designs on the Scrubs as such, why does it need to be included in the boundary of the MDC?

Mayor's Oral Update (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Richard Tracey
  • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
Richard Tracey AM: Mr Chairman, are you calling me now? Thank you. I was not sure. There was so much noise coming from the other end, apart from the jabbering from the Member for London East over there. Mr Mayor, going back to this matter of some sort of reformation and further efficiencies in policing in the UK, which Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe wrote about in The Guardian, you may remember I asked him various questions about this last week before he had written his article. I do not know whether the discussions prompted him to write it. He was actually...
Subscribe to