Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Next Generation Forensic Systems (ForSITE) Pathfinder

Key information

Reference code: PCD 360

Date signed:

Decision by: Sophie Linden, Deputy Mayor, Policing and Crime

Executive summary

The purpose of this report is to seek the approval of the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime for a pathfinder implementation of ForSITE, delivering a minimal viable case management product that covers the end-to-end process for the Fingerprint Lifts sub-service within Forensics.

Recommendation

The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime is recommended to:

• Approve the proposed spend of £841k capital above the original Final Business Case approvals.

• Note that the capital programme approved in February 2018 had been amended to reflect the latest estimate and will now be adjusted to reflect the spend profile in this business case. No additional capital is required.

• Agree an additional £53k of on-going Revenue costs above the Final Business Case revenue costs of £515k. The additional revenue costs will be funded from the Digital Policing revenue budgets.

Non-confidential facts and advice to the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (DMPC)

1. Introduction and background

1.1. The purpose of the ForSITE project was to deliver a business process case management system (CMS) and Laboratory Information Management system (LIMs) to manage the workflow of requests for Forensics Services, from crime scene/request to outcomes reported back.



2. Issues for consideration

2.1. This pathfinder will test the four applications for the end-to-end process, and the project delivery approach, for a sub-service within Forensic Services; Digitised Workflow for Search against Fingerprint Lifts from BCU Central North, to prove viability of ForSITE project and deliver operational benefits to investigations.



3. Financial Comments

3.1. The additional capital spend of £841k is funded within the revised capital programme for 2018/19.

3.2. The additional £53k of ongoing revenue costs is funded from within existing budgets.

4.1. There are no significant legal implications arising from this report.



5. Equality Comments

5.1. There are no equality implications arising from this report.



6. Background/supporting papers

6.1. Report

Signed decision document

Need a document on this page in an accessible format?

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of a PDF or other document on this page in a more accessible format, please get in touch via our online form and tell us which format you need.

It will also help us if you tell us which assistive technology you use. We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.