PCD 1358 Request for authorisation to settle civil claims against the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)

PCD 1358 Request for authorisation to settle civil claims against the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) 

The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (DMPC) is asked to approve the settlement of civil claims against the MPS. 

There is an open and exempt report as some of the information relates to data protection, is commercially sensitive and is legal professional privileged. 

The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (DMPC) is asked to approve the settlement of  claims brought for assault and battery, false imprisonment, misfeasance in public office and breaches of Articles 5, 8, 10 and 11 and 14 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR as set out in the part 2 report. 

The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime has the discretion to authorise the settlement of a civil claim where it would be conducive to the maintenance of an efficient and effective police force. 

PART I - NON-CONFIDENTIAL FACTS AND ADVICE TO THE DMPC 

1. Introduction and background 

1. The civil claims are brought by 17 people who were contained and subsequently arrested for violent disorder following a protest at Westfield shopping Centre on 14th December 2014 and a further 3 people who were contained but not arrested at the same event. It is alleged that the claimants were unlawfully detained. 

2. Financial Comments 

1. The cost of any settlement, if agreed, would be met from the centrally held MPS third party claims provision budget.  

3. Legal Comments 

1. MOPAC has the power to pay any sum required in connection with the settlement for any claim made against the Commissioner under Section 88 of the Police Act 1996.  

2. Pursuant to the MOPAC Scheme of Delegation dated October 2016, DMPC must authorise settlements above £50,000.00, or those claims that are otherwise high profile or sensitive, according to the criteria set out in section 4.10 of the Scheme. 

3. There is an open and exempt report as some of the information relates to data protection, is commercially sensitive and is legal professional privileged 

4. GDPR and Data Privacy  

1. The processing of personal data has been minimised as part of this decision and is held within Part 2 of the report. 

5. Equality Comments 

1. To continue policing with the consent of the population it serves, the police will always seek to treat everyone fairly and openly. Race or equality issues do not appear to have an impact in this matter. 

6. Background/supporting papers 

1. Refer to Part 2 of the report.