Key information
Executive summary
This MD seeks approval for delivery of the Health Team’s annual work programme for 2017-18, and for two longer-term programmes, the Healthy Young London programme and the London Healthy Workplace Charter, both for 2017-18 to 2019-20; and for associated expenditure.
Decision
That the Mayor:
1. approves expenditure of up to £497,000 to deliver the Health Team’s annual work programme in 2017-18, as detailed in Table 1;
2. approves expenditure of up to £1.263m spread over the financial years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20 to deliver the Healthy Young London programme, as detailed in Table 2;
3. approves expenditure of up to £555,000 over the financial years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20 to deliver the London Healthy Workplace Charter, as detailed in Table 2.
Part 1: Non-confidential facts and advice
1.1 Overview
1.1.1 The Health Team is undertaking a number of activities to develop the Mayor’s Health Inequalities Strategy; to enable him to act effectively in his role as Chair of the London Health Board; and to support the NHS and boroughs to improve the mental and physical health of all Londoners and promote their social wellbeing.
1.1.2 The Health Team’s programme has five aims aligned to the anticipated aims of the forthcoming Health Inequalities Strategy which is due for consultation commencing in summer 2017. They are to ensure that:
a. All Londoners benefit from a society, environment and economy that promotes good mental and physical health;
b. Londoners have improved mental health;
c. Every London child has a healthy start to life;
d. The healthy choice is the easy choice for all Londoners;
e. London’s diverse communities are healthy and resilient.
1.1.3 The proposed programme includes funding for the London Health Board that has already been approved under MD 1455; and it extends funding for the London Healthy Workplace Charter agreed under MD 1495, the Healthy Schools London Programme agreed under MD 1151 and MD 1551, the Healthy Early Years pilot agreed under DD 2023 and the London Health and Care Devolution programme agreed under MD 1619.
1.2 Evidence
1.2.1 London has among the widest health inequalities in England with a difference in healthy life expectancy across the city of more than 15 years for men and almost 19 years for women. This means that Londoners in some parts of the city are spending long periods in ill-health as well as dying early from preventable diseases.
1.2.2 Most studies suggest that health care accounts for less than half of differences in people’s overall health. Social, environmental and economic factors, known as ‘the wider determinants’ are understood to have a larger influence overall, and the team programme is based on a comprehensive approach which addresses this range of factors over the full length of the Mayoral term.
• Mental health: The social and economic costs of mental ill health to London are significant. 1 in 4 people experience mental ill health at any given time. The cost of not acting early to prevent or provide people with appropriate care for mental ill health impacts across the entire public and is significantly damaging to London’s economy. An economic analysis by the Greater London Authority in 2014 (London mental health: the invisible cost of mental health) showed that the financial cost of mental ill health to London amounts to over £26 billion each year, including the quality of life reductions, public expenditure, economic costs related to informal caring, crime, as well as output losses due to worklessness, sickness absence and reduced productivity. Research from the Time to Change campaign which aims to reduce stigma of mental ill-health has shown that since 2008/9 attitudes towards mental health in the London area are less positive than in other areas of the country, but have also improved more quickly during the period Time to Change has been active, suggesting that action can be effective in tackling mental health stigma.
1.2.3 Children: A full and detailed epidemiological review of the health needs of London’s children has been carried out by the GLA in partnership with key stakeholders. The learning environment is a captive setting for children and young people, families and staff and international evidence shows that focusing on this environment is an effective way to change attitudes and behaviours. However, evidence also shows that simply focusing in on one aspect of what contributes to a healthy lifestyle, such as nutrition or physical activity, can have a limited effect. A ‘whole systems, whole settings’ approach is required, including interventions across a spectrum including healthy eating and food, physical activity and active travel, and emotional wellbeing and resilience. The programme has been developed based on this evidence.
1.2.4 Healthy choices and healthy work: If you are in employment you can expect to live for longer, have better general well-being and be in better physical and mental health. Research into thousands of small geographical communities across England has shown that for every 10 per cent increase in employment deprivation (those involuntarily unemployed), life expectancy reduces by almost a year. In other words the communities with the highest rate of involuntary unemployment have a life expectancy that is almost nine years lower than areas with the lowest rate. There are also clear business benefits of a healthy workforce: happy workers are 12% more productive on average with unhappy workers being 10% less productive; and physically active workers take 27% fewer sick days than their non-physically active colleagues.
1.3 Links to Mayoral policies and strategies
1.3.1 The programme is directly related to delivery of the Mayor’s Health Inequalities Strategy, a statutory duty under the GLA Act 1999.
1.3.2 It is directly linked to the delivery of the Mayor’s policy commitments to:
a. Champion and scrutinise London’s NHS;
b. Get to grips with health inequality in London;
c. Promote active lifestyles, support those who want to shake off lifestyle risks and tackle childhood obesity;
d. Renew focus on HIV prevention;
e. Break down the stigma of mental illness and coordinate efforts to reduce the number of people who take their own lives.
1.3.3 In addition, elements of the health programme will support delivery of other statutory and non-statutory strategies and programmes, including:
a. The Mayor’s Transport Strategy;
b. The Economic Development Strategy;
c. The Environment Strategy;
d. The Housing Strategy;
e. The London Plan;
f. The Food Strategy;
g. The Sport programme.
2.1 Key deliverables
2.1.1 The outputs for the programme will be:
• System leadership
Memorandum of Understanding for devolution of health and care powers to the London system, and development of associated governance models
Four meetings of the London Health Board and annual conference and report
Development of an Mayoral position on NHS Sustainability and Transformation Plans
• All Londoners benefit from a society, environment and economy that promotes good mental and physical health
Publication of a new health inequalities strategy for London
Expert public health input to the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, London Plan and Air Quality Implementation Group
• That Londoners have improved mental health
Campaigns to reduce the stigma associated with mental ill health and increase awareness about mental health
A significant scoping exercise to identify collaborative action where there is a case for delivery at a citywide geography
Mental health literacy training
• Every London child has a healthy start to life
Development and further roll-out of the schools component of the Healthy Young London awards scheme, as year one of a programme to reach 80% of London schools and accredit 1,000 by 2020
Pilot, evaluation and full launch of a new early years component of the Healthy Young London awards scheme, as year one of a programme aiming to reach 40% of London’s early years settings by 2020
• The healthy choice is the easy choice for all Londoners
Further development and roll-out of the London Healthy Workplace Charter as year one of a programme aiming to reach 750,000 Londoners by 2020
Support for an annual campaign to reduce harmful binge drinking
• London’s diverse communities are healthy and resilient
A scoping exercise to understand how best the GLA can support good health through community based approaches
2.2 Outcomes
2.2.1 The programme is designed to contribute to improvements in the following key outcomes:
• Healthy life expectancy;
• Child obesity;
• Wellbeing.
Table 1: annual work programme
Table 2: longer-term programmes
The Healthy Young London and Healthy Workplace Charter programmes are long-term programmes and require investment over three years. This is because:
• These programmes have been designed to be delivered over multiple years, with development phases during year one (ie Healthy Young London early years pilot, branding and website development and Healthy Workplace Charter rescoping for low pay sectors) and full implementation planned for later years in order to achieve ambitions by 2020;
• The success of the programmes is dependent on partnership with the NHS, London boroughs, businesses, schools and early years' settings. These programmes leverage considerable system wide investment and partners need to plan ahead and will be unable to confirm their involvement and investment for future years without a corresponding commitment from the GLA beyond the current financial year.
3.1 An Integrated Impact Assessment, which includes Equalities Impact Assessment within its scope, is being conducted as part of the development of the Health Inequalities Strategy. This will identify major positive and negative impacts of the programme for groups protected under the Equality Act 2010 and propose ways to strengthen benefits and mitigate negative impacts, as well as identify issues concerning the four cross-cutting themes under the GLA Act 1999.
3.2 Impact assessments have also been carried out on the other main elements of the programme, including:
3.3 Healthy Young London: The new Healthy Young London programme is a universal offer, but aims to target those areas of London with high levels of child poverty and ingrained health inequalities. Evaluation of Healthy Schools London (September 2016) has shown that schools in areas with low socio-economic status (SES) are more likely to be enrolled in the programme than schools in high SES areas. The prospective health and health inequalities impact assessment of the early years elements of the programme suggests that it should have a positive effect on health inequalities. However, careful consideration needs to be given to the support available, to settings and childminders who participate in the early years programme. Take up of the programme will need to be monitored to ensure it is being taken up equitably across London, in particular in areas with a higher level of deprivation or where more of the population is from an ethnic minority group.
3.4 Healthy Workplace Charter: In London in 2015 the employment rate for the white ethnicity group was 78.3 per cent compared with 65.1 per cent for all ethnic minorities. The employment rate for disabled people was 50.1 per cent, compared with 77.4 per cent for non-disabled people. These groups are also likely to experience poorer health and shorter life expectancy, resulting in significant, unacceptable health inequalities between Londoners. A Health Inequalities Impact Assessment was carried out on the programme in 2013. This looked at the likely potential impacts on those with protected characteristics and concluded that the programme has beneficial impacts. A focus on the low paid sectors will also help to support those with protected characteristics. Successful delivery of the outcomes would depend on increased promotional activities, including through the Mayor’s proposed business compact.
3.5 Thrive London mental health programme: The Thrive London programme is still in development, so an equalities impact assessment has not yet been conducted, but is based on a principle of proportionate universalism, meaning that it will seek to improve the mental health of the whole population, while recognising that some people have greater needs and need proportionately greater support. Development of the programme has included extensive engagement with a wide range of organisations representing groups with protected characteristics and people who have experienced mental health problems.
Major risks and issues
Risk assessments have been conducted for each element of the programme. The biggest cross-cutting risks identified are as follows.
Links to Mayoral strategies and priorities
The health team programme is designed to fulfil of the Mayor’s manifesto commitments to be a champion for health in the city and to improve public health, and to meet statutory duties to develop a health inequalities strategy.
Impact Assessments and consultations
Impact Assessments have been conducted on the key elements of the programme, as detailed above. Consultation with Londoners and stakeholders on the Health Inequalities Strategy will take place in summer 2017.
5.1 Approval is being sought for the following:
5.1.1 Expenditure of up to £497,000 for the Health Team’s annual work programmes;
5.1.2 Expenditure of up to £1.263m on the Healthy Young London Programme, with costs incurred over 3 financial years in 2017-18 (£328k), 2018-19 (£445k), and 2019-20 (£490k); and
5.1.3 Expenditure of up to £555,000 for delivery of the London Healthy Charter Programme, with costs incurred over 3 financial years in 2017-18 (£130k), 2018-19 (£175k), and 2019-20 (£250k).
5.2 The 2017-18 costs will be funded from the Health’s Team budget for 2017-18 which is held within the Health and Communities Unit. Future years’ budgets are indicative and still subject to the GLA’s annual budget setting process.
6.1 The foregoing sections of this report indicate that:
6.1.1 the decisions requested of the Mayor concern the exercise of the GLA’s general powers under section 30 of the GLA Act 1999 and the duty to prepare a health inequality strategy under section 41. As such the proposed activities fall within the statutory powers of the GLA to do such things as may be considered to further, and or be facilitative of or conducive or incidental to the discharge of the GLA’s principal purposes, in particular in manner which promotes the improvement of health of persons in Greater London; and
6.1.2 in formulating the proposals in respect of which a decision is sought officers will or have complied with the GLA’s related statutory duties to:
(a) pay due regard to the principle that there should be equality of opportunity for all people;
(b) consider how the proposals will promote the improvement of health of persons, health inequalities between persons and to contribute towards the achievement of sustainable development in the United Kingdom; and
(c) consult with appropriate bodies.
6.2 In taking the decisions requested, the Mayor must have due regard to the Public Sector Equality Duty; namely the need to eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other conduct prohibited by the Equality Act 2010, and to advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic (race, disability, gender, age, sexual orientation, religion or belief, pregnancy and maternity and gender reassignment) and persons who do not share it and foster good relations between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it (section 149 of the Equality Act 2010). To this end, the Mayor should have particular regard to section 3 (above) of this report.
6.3 Should the Mayor be minded to make the decisions sought Officers must ensure that:
6.3.1 any services required for delivery of the project is procured by Transport for London Procurement who will determine the detail of the procurement strategy to be adopted in accordance with the GLA’s Contracts and Funding Code and appropriate contract documentation is put in place and executed by the successful bidder(s) and the GLA before the commencement of the services; and
6.3.2 to the extent that it is proposed that any expenditure takes the form of grant funding, such funding is disbursed in a fair and transparent manner in accordance with the requirements of the GLA’s Contracts and Funding Code and appropriate funding agreements are put in place and executed by the proposed recipients and the GLA before any commitment is made to the award of such funding; and
6.3.3 they do not place any reliance upon any sponsorship or other third party funding before a legally binding commitment is in place for the provision of the same.
Signed decision document
MD2115 Health Team Work Programme 2017-18 (signed) PDF