Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • Ensuring the “Requires Improvement” conclusion of Croydon Tram Fatigue Audit IA 17 780 is entered correctly into the Public Record

    • Reference: 2020/1513
    • Question by: Keith Prince
    • Meeting date: 21 May 2020
    In both your response to Question 2019/8958 (which was used to justify your responses to Question 2019/19759) and Question 2020/0082 you clearly state that “The post meeting note in the minutes of the 26 June 2017 Safety, Sustainability and Human Resources Panel was drafted prior to the audit report (IA 17 780) being issued.” A review of documents produced by TfL in November 2018 (FOI 1749-1819 https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/decision_to_insert_a_post_meetin…) clearly shows that the final draft of the post meeting note in the minutes of the 26 June 2017 SSHR Meeting was sent by TfL’s General Counsel on 19 September 2017, 5 days...

  • IA 17780 and the December 2017 Audit and Assurance Committees Internal Audit Report

    • Reference: 2019/19759
    • Question by: Keith Prince
    • Meeting date: 17 October 2019
    Further to your response to Question 2019/8958, in Appendix 1 of the Audit and Assurance Internal Audit Quarter 2 Report 2017/18 published on 14 December 2017 (http://content.tfl.gov.uk/aac-20171214-part-1-item05-internal-audit-q2-…) why was IA 17780 "Management of Fatigue in Tram Operations Limited (TOL)" recorded as “Consultancy” and “No Conclusion" and not “Requires Improvement’?