Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

DD1418 London Schools Excellence Fund Round 2 – Small Grants Programme

Key information

Decision type: Director

Reference code: DD1418

Date signed:

Decision by: Jeff Jacobs , Head of Paid Service

Executive summary

MD1132 contains the Mayor’s approval of the establishment of the London Schools Excellence Fund (the “Fund”) to help London schools make progress in raising school standards in literacy, numeracy, science, technology, engineering, maths and modern foreign and ancient languages. The Director is asked to approve expenditure of £44,569 to provide additional resource to the managing agent of the London Schools Excellence Fund small grants programme to enable them to manage 50% more projects and double the amount of funding.

Decision

The Director approves expenditure of up to £44,569 to extend the contract of the Managing Agent (Rocket Science) of the London Schools Excellence Fund round 2 projects from June 2015 to September 2015 (£28,750) and September 2015 to January 2016 (£15,819).

Part 1: Non-confidential facts and advice

1.1 MD1132 contains the Mayor’s approval of the establishment of the London Schools Excellence Fund (the “Fund”) to help London schools make progress in raising school standards in literacy, numeracy, science, technology, engineering, maths and modern foreign and ancient languages.

1.2 DD1080 contains approval for the appointment of Rocket Science as the external managing agent of the Small Grants Programme – Round 2 of the LSEF and expenditure of £99,250.

1.3 Rocket Science was appointed by the Greater London Authority (GLA) to manage the Small Grants Programme – Round 2 of the LSEF on the basis of their proposal submitted in May 2013. This was based upon the assumption made by the GLA that round 2 grants would total approximately £1m and that grants would be made to fund 20 projects.

1.4 Due to the quality of the applications received, the GLA agreed to fund 31 projects. The grant fund increased from £1m to just over £2m and the number of projects to be monitored and supported by the round 2 managing agent increased by over 50% from 20 to 31. DD1142 and DD1195 approved grants under the small grant programme (round 2). A further two decisions approved additional funding to a number of round 2 projects (DD1281 and DD1304).
1.5 In view of the increase in the size of the Round 2 Fund and consequently the additional workload in managing the grants over the remainder of the LSEF funding period, the GLA varied Rocket Science’s contract in June 2014 to increase to £128,000.

1.6 Whilst this is in an increase in the total management fees of £28,750, overall this represents a fall in the proportion of the Round 2 grants fund spent on outsourced management from 10% to 6% and enables Rocket Science to continue to provide a high quality service to the Round 2 projects and the GLA over the remainder of the programme.

1.7 Rocket Science’s current contract is due to complete in September 2015. However claims and project self-evaluation reports are not due until 30 September. A number of projects have also applied to extend their delivery period by one term to the end of December. The Managing Agent will be required to manage the closure, evaluation, and dissemination process for round 2 LSEF grants during Quarter 3 2015/16, and approve project final reports in January 2016.

1.8 Approval is sought to extend Rocket Science’s contract for four months to the end of January 2016 at the cost of an additional quarterly payment of £15,819.

2.1 The overall objective of appointing a managing agent for the small grants programme is to ensure the successful delivery of this programme. By outsourcing the management of the grants to a dedicated grants manager the Education and Youth Team are ensuring that the correct level of resources will be allocated to manage the programme efficiently and effectively.

2.2 Rocket Science will be able to provide projects with effective support to embed the learning from the programme in their organisations and develop the appropriate systems to support the future sustainability of the projects.

3.1 Throughout the Education Inquiry, including the call for evidence, consideration was given to factors of economic and ethnic disadvantage, gender differences and special needs and disabilities. Key analysis was subsequently published in the first report of the Inquiry (February 2012).

4.1. Key Risks and Issues

Risk description

Mitigation / Risk response

Current probability (1-4)

Current impact (1-4)

RAG rating

GLA risk owner

1

Monitoring and evaluation do not accurately capture the reality of the programme

The Rocket Science team will monitor the application of the evaluation framework across projects and provide expert assistance to ensure that it is applied consistently and effectively

2

2

Amber

E&Y

2

Not able to meet specific timescales or un- anticipated absences or leavers within the programme management team.

Rocket Science will use a rigorous project management process and use traffic light system to provide early warning of any potential timescale issues reported on a

monthly basis.

2

2

Amber

E&Y

5.1 The additional contract costs of £44,569 relate to a variation that took place in June 2014, not previously approved, totalling £28,750 and a further extension from September 2015 to January 2016 for £15,819 as detailed within the main body of this report, and will be funded from the existing 2015-16 London Schools Excellence Fund budget held within the Health & Communities Unit.

6.1 The report indicates that:

6.1.1 the decisions requested of the Director (in accordance with the GLA’s Contracts and Funding Code) fall within the GLA’s statutory powers to do such things considered to further or which are facilitative of, conducive or incidental to the promotion of economic development and wealth creation, social development in Greater London; and

6.1.2 in formulating the proposals in respect of which a decision is sought officers have complied with the Authority’s related statutory duties to:

• pay due regard to the principle that there should be equality of opportunity for all people (further details on equalities are set out in section 3 above) and to the duty under section 149 of the 2010 Act to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation as well as to advance equality of opportunity and foster good relations between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not ;

• consider how the proposals will promote the improvement of health of persons, health inequalities between persons and to contribute towards the achievement of sustainable development in the United Kingdom; and

• consult with appropriate bodies.

6.2 Officers must ensure that appropriate contractual documentation for the variation is put in place and executed, by Rocket Science and the GLA before any additional sums are paid.

Activity

Timeline

Signing of contract variation

September 2015

Checking and collating final evaluation reports

September 2015

Project Monitoring visits

October 2015

Processing final claims

January 2016

Need a document on this page in an accessible format?

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of a PDF or other document on this page in a more accessible format, please get in touch via our online form and tell us which format you need.

It will also help us if you tell us which assistive technology you use. We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.